MCN Commentary & Analysis

Movie Content Scoreboard: Episode 2 – Tenet & Mulan

I have avoided writing constantly about the immediate prospects of exhibition and studios because we didn’t get to the next significant event between the last Movie Content Scoreboard in July and the Tenet/Mulan experiments of the last couple weeks.

I will deliver “Episode III – After The Fall” soon. But I wanted to keep the focus on the two recent major experiments. I keep reading emotional postures on the future of exhibition and VOD. But the studios have real financial skin in the game, while those writing about it have none… just a desire for what they would like to be entertained by, as soon as possible, in a way that makes them comfortable

The easier analysis of the two major movie releases is Mulan. It’s been two weekends+ and we haven’t heard a word about how much business was done in the Disney+ SuperPremium VOD window. We know that the film hasn’t done much business in any international markets where it landed in theatrical. And Disney knows that even if they add, say 50%, onto the Trolls World Tour number, this experiment is a streaming failure.

Unless there is a great surprise coming, Disney will lose no less than $50 million on this Mulan experiment. There is no conservative estimate of what Mulan would hav done in normal windows that would have ended up in a loss. The hope for this experiment is that it would at least break even, if not make some fraction of what normal windows would offer.

If it were not for the public embarrassment, Disney would likely be well-served, financially, to refund half the Mulan SPVOD fee that anyone has paid and push the film out on normal PVOD at $15 a pop. This would make the market much wider instantly, and most likely return a higher net. But that is not going to happen because… again… the public embarrassment at this point. Disney has much bigger issues.

Tenet is more complex, in every way. $30 million domestic. $180 international, almost a third of which is China, which usually costs an extra 20% of gross against rentals. But with premium deals for theatrical done by WB, that is probably a 40% bigger hit than any other country.

A generous estimate of Tenet rentals coming back to WB worldwide after three weekends is $130 million.

Do I believe that there is a second wind for Tenet? Absolutely. But if the film’s PVOD brings in 50% more than the world record for VOD, the generous estimate on gross returns to WB for Tenet is about $150 million.

So we made it to $280 million. Now add another generous $80m in post-theatrical/VOD. Hell, let’s go $150 million gross with a massively successful theatrical rerelease returning $75 million. $435 million. WB doesn’t lose money on Tenet in this most generous of scenarios.

What would Tenet have looked like in the normal series of windows?

Conservative worldwide gross of $650 million, returning $400 million to the studio. (Remember the pumped-up split. And this estimates $150 million of the gross from China, at a reduced split.)

VOD and physical media sales net a conservative $200 million.

Premium Cable/Satellite window, conservatively $30 million.

Streaming second window, say $20 million in the first two years.

$650 million, conservatively, with another $50 million in potential incidental revenues from areas like Merchandising, International Post-Theatrical, etc. AND don’t forget that the marketing budget is made smaller by over $100 million in cross-promotional ad-committed marketing deals that aren’t happening under the current situation.

Add an extra $100 million in marketing costs, if you will, for a “regular” release. Take every financial advantage you can in adding it all up. Pump up the current release all you like and tighten the margins on a traditional windowed non-COVID release… and you are still leaving at least $100 million on the table in the current scenario. On a $200 million investment in production.

There are at least 16 completed movies in a similar boat as Mulan and Tenet. So aside from “I want to see it on my TV right NOW!” what argument can anyone make to cause studios to see any advantage in moving forward right now?

That discussion in Episode 3…

9 Responses to “Movie Content Scoreboard: Episode 2 – Tenet & Mulan”

  1. Dr Wally Rises says:

    Thank you Dave. Two small rejoinders : Mulan has been out for 12 days, not three weeks.. And there is a growing belief and momentum now that Soul will now inevitably be going the same Disney+ route come November.. Which can at least be taken as circumstantial evidence that Mulan has done well enough to proceed with repeating the experiment?

  2. Stella's Boy says:

    The CDC saying normal is possible by late 2021 with a vaccine would seem to be bad news for studios and movie theaters.

  3. David Poland says:

    I will adjust the Mulan timing.

    Whose growing belief and momentum, Dr Wally? Someone floated it and now it’s a full on rumor that Disney has denied.

  4. Stella's Boy says:

    I’d say Tenet proves that most people don’t feel safe going to a movie theater right now and have little desire to. That seems like a message studios and movie theaters need to pay close attention to: “A recent Morning Consult report from says only 18% of consumers feel comfortable returning to cinemas.”

  5. AkiraKaneda says:

    A key difference might be whether or not a “quarantine movie” could have movie theater legs post-quarantine.

    For example, Mulan is DOA, with most reviews appreciating the scenery but complaining about the lack of heart and a superhero heroine rather than the brave girl portrayed in the animated film. You put Mulan in theaters in a year and very few will go.

    Tenet, on the other hand, is from one of the best directors working today with a sizable following who will not only see his films several times to dissect them, but will also chase a 70MM screening if they can make it happen. (That’s my oldest son and I for Dunkirk.) You give me a safe screening of Tenet in six months to a year, I’ll be there with my family.

    I could be very wrong — I have been in the past! — but for truly good event pictures, I think audiences will head to the theater if the experience is worth it. (I’ve seen every Bond movie in the theater since A View To A Kill — and I’;; see it six months after VOD in a theater if I can.)

  6. David Poland says:

    They are. Clearly.

  7. David Poland says:

    There is little upside to releasing it and then re-releasing it. There are certainly films that can shake money from the tree when theaters are fully open. But that is not a model that the studios will be aiming for.

  8. Dr Wally Rises says:

    ‘Whose growing belief and momentum, Dr Wally? Someone floated it and now it’s a full on rumor that Disney has denied’.

    A fair point. At any rate, if Soul is on American movie screens in November I’d be frankly stunned.

  9. Serg says:

    Isn’t 400 net profit on 650 theatrical an unusually high margin?? Maybe in NA distribs can get 60 cents on the profit dollar, but this margin is certainly much lower international?

    As someone who has minimal experience with South American theatrical market, you’re typically only seeing 30-40 cents on the dollar IF you’re lucky.

MCN Commentary & Analysis See All

My Twitter Feed on Warner Media Th/Fri

David Poland | December 4, 2020

What Will Become Of The Movies?

David Poland | December 3, 2020

Thankful 2020

David Poland | November 26, 2020

The News Curated by Ray Pride See All


Steven Zeitchik: "It's worth remembering -- because many people seem to have forgotten -- that before the pandemic U.S. movie theaters had their best two-year period ever, with a collective $23 billion in revenue. This isn't some dying model that digital needs to come in and save. Those sales, incidentally, likely include the many people who swear they will never go to a movie theater again. When the new Marvel or Jordan Peele or Mission: Impossible or Parasite comes only to theaters, I suspect they'll be lining up like they always have. What’s troubling is the false binary: streaming vs theaters. You can like both! Netflix is good and theaters are good! Institutions don't have to die just because something new is cool. And historically it takes more than one company in a strategically tough spot to kill a model. Of course ownership can change and experiences can change. We watched silent films and newsreels and serials in movie houses, and then we saw gritty crime films and pop films and dramatic films, and then 3-D films and franchise films. And there weren't showtimes and then there were showtimes, and seats weren't reserved and then they were reserved; we went from movie palaces to multiplexes to downtown dine-in rooms with reclining seats. And studios owned theaters and then families owned theaters and then entrepreneurs did and then big corporate chains and soon studios might own theaters again, and package movies as experiences or events or something new we haven't yet thought of. Of course it's theoretically possible an entire American institution just goes away. But given how durable it's been over the decades, I wouldn't bet on it. And certainly not because one company, for its own internal reasons, at one moment, needs to put its movies somewhere else."

Twitter | December 5, 2020


"Stankey decided to use HBO as the centerpiece for a new mission: Build a true Netflix competitor, dubbed HBO Max. When Stankey took over as AT&T’s CEO, he passed that goal to new WarnerMedia CEO Jason Kilar, who previously launched Hulu. Stankey has dismantled the old Time Warner, spurring dozens of executives from all parts of the company to depart. He is attempting to funnel all of the company’s resources from cable, film, and HBO into HBO Max. Disney, Comcast’s NBCUniversal and ViacomCBS are all going through similar changes now to prepare for a world where subscription streaming services overtake cable as the world’s primary form of television consumption. Stankey — the MBA-buzzword, deep-voiced phone guy — was ahead of the trend. Still, his vision irritated some veteran WarnerMedia executives, who question Stankey’s knowledge of media. The execution of his mission, which Kilar has overseen since May, has been marred by strategic confusion and culture clashes, according to more than a dozen high-ranking WarnerMedia employees, about half of whom have left the company in the past six months. For now, investors don’t like what they see. AT&T is trading near a 10-year low."

CNBC | December 5, 2020


Nicholas Kristof: "I've spent the last few months reporting this piece about Pornhub. What most people don't realize is that it's infested with rape videos. I talked to child trafficking survivors whose rape videos the company had distributed and monetized. Unconscionable. Let's be clear: The issue is not porn, it's rape. Just as the problem with Harvey Weinstein or Bill Cosby wasn't the sex but the lack of consent, it's the same with Pornhub. Search "13yo" on Pornhub, and you get more than 100,000 videos. There are playlists called "Under Age." A special question for Canada, because Pornhub is based in Montreal. Prime Minister Trudeau, you are rightly proud of your reputation as a feminist. So why does Canada host a company that inflicts rape videos on the world? It's not just Pornhub, of course. Companies have enjoyed impunity, so even as we prosecuted individuals like Jeffrey Epstein we allowed corporations like Mindgeek (which owns Pornhub) to monetize rape videos. Pornhub is Jeffrey Epstein times 1,000. Solutions are difficult and complicated. I don't have perfect ways to solve the problem of online child sexual abuse. But I do outline steps that would help. These survivors risked so much to tell their stories."

Twitter | December 5, 2020

Screen Daily

World's Second-Largest Exhibitor, Cineworld, Pledges Reopening March 2021, Post-Vaccine

Screen Daily | December 5, 2020

The Video Section See All

Mrs. America, Uzo Aduba

David Poland | September 8, 2020

The Podcast Section See All