The News

HFPA Suit

HFPA Membership Suit: “One benefit members receive flows from the importance that motion picture studios assign to winning Academy Awards. Motion picture studios annually spend millions of dollars on “Oscar campaigns.” The HFPA confers its Golden Globe awards while members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences are in the process of deciding which persons and achievements will be nominated to contend for an Oscar. Winning Golden Globe awards is therefore viewed both as a means to create “buzz” for a successful Oscar campaign, and as a predictor (or self-fulfilling prophesy) of success on Oscar night. As a consequence, studios go far out of their way to accommodate HFPA members by inviting them to attend every industry function, event, and screening, and, most importantly, making their top producers, directors, actors, and other talent available for exclusive interviews with HFPA members. When foreign entertainment reporters make their seasonal migration to Los Angeles for “Awards Season,” they, like their Los Angeles-based brethren excluded from membership in the HFPA, find themselves competing for any invitations and interview slots that remain after the HFPA’s members have gotten their fill. The opportunities for HFPA members to ply their trade to the exclusion of non-members are not limited to “awards season” but are continual and ongoing. All year long, HFPA members enjoy all-expenses-paid trips to film festivals around the world where the studios treat them lavishly and accommodate their every desire. They do so because such concepts as “conflict of interest,” “impropriety,” “impartiality,” and “appearance of objectivity” are unknown to the HFPA. Further, there is no special requirement for voting such as, for example, watching the nominated motion pictures and television shows. One member now in is upper 90s is, sadly, deaf and legally blind. He does, however, cast one of the 87 votes that determine who will win a Golden Globe.”

No Responses to “HFPA Suit”

Comments are closed.

MCN Commentary & Analysis See All

THB #93: The Batman (no spoilers)

David Poland | March 6, 2022

THB #76: 9 Weeks To Oscar

David Poland | January 26, 2022

THB #73: Netflix Is Chilled

David Poland | January 24, 2022

The News Curated by Ray Pride See All

-30-

May 1, 2022

The New York Times

"Netflix, the great disrupter whose algorithms and direct-to-consumer platform have forced powerful media incumbents to rethink their economic models, now seems to need a big strategy change itself. It got me thinking about the simple idea that my film and TV production company Blumhouse is built on: If you give artists a lot of creative freedom and a little money upfront but a big stake in the movie’s or TV show’s commercial success, more often than not the result will be both commercial (the filmmakers are incentivized to make films that will resonate with audiences) and artistically interesting (creative freedom!). This approach has yielded movies as varied as Get Out (made for $4.5 million, with worldwide box office receipts of more than $250 million), Whiplash (made for $3.3 million, winner of three Academy Awards), The Invisible Man (made for $7 million, earned more than $140 million) and Paranormal Activity (made for $15,000, grossed more than $190 million).From the beginning, the most important strategy I used to persuade artists to work with me was to make radically transparent deals: We usually paid the artists (“participants” in Hollywood lingo) the absolute minimum allowable by union contracts upfront, with the promise of healthy bonuses based on actual box office results—instead of the opaque 'percentage points' that artists are usually offered. Anyone can see box office results immediately, so creators don’t quarrel with the payouts. In fact, when it comes time for an artist to collect a bonus based on box office receipts, I email a video clip of myself dropping the check off at FedEx to the recipient."
Jason Blum Sees Room For "Scrappier" Netflix

The New York Times | April 30, 2022

"As a critic Gavin was entertaining, wry, questioning, sensitive, perceptive"
Critic-Filmmaker Gavin Millar Was 84; Films Include Cream In My Coffee, Dreamchild

April 29, 2022

The New York Times

Disney Executive Geoff Morrell Out After Less Than Four Months

The New York Times | April 29, 2022

The Video Section See All

Mike Mills, C’mon C’mon

David Poland | January 24, 2022

The Podcast Section See All