MCN Commentary & Analysis

The State of Oscars. The One About The Actors Awards.

And now, ladies and gentlemen, The SAG Nominations.

This award season is a corkscrew. Maybe it’s because of the relative brevity. The timetable, except for Oscar, isn’t all that different. Yet, it feels more compact and each group voting for awards seems less influenced by the others.

On the other hand, the shape of the season is incredibly influenced by the process of narrowing that happened this season, as it has happened in every season over the last 20 years or so. There were, maybe, 25 movies in serious play back just as the Festival Run started with Venice’s opening. By the end of the New York Film Festival, it was about 15. And realistically, there were only another dozen movies or so being seriously considered for acting or writing awards that were not serious players in the Best Picture race.

For perspective, there are 15 films with awards ambitions opening in theaters in the 20 days from now until the end of the year. There were 13 in November. Six in October. Five in September. But only a couple titles, with thin prospects, were not shown to the voting world by the end of November.

In any case, SAG.

My personal tastes are irrelevant to the quality of the nominations, but I like this list, even when I don’t completely agree with it. It’s refreshing. It’s not right on the boilerplate. And as a result, it will likely — as usual — not be a close correlative to the ultimate choices of The Academy membership. 80% or so.

For instance, the only other foreign language film to get an Ensemble nomination before was Life is Beautiful in 1998.

I have been a believer in Scarlett Johansson being nominated in Lead and Supporting Actress. It may not happen again with The Academy, but I think it should. I don’t get a vote.

I love the unexpected set of nominations for all three actresses from Bombshell, a film that is really seeing its first deep breath of awards recognition from this group. (On the other hand, one of the great performances of this year or any other, John Lithgow bringing horror and sympathy to Roger Ailes, got kicked to the curb. It’s made even worse by the nomination for Russell Crowe’s excellent, but inferior take on Ailes from the Showtime series. Boo.)

There are small surprises all over the list. Christian Bale and Taron Egerton in Lead Actor, keeping hope alive for both with Oscar after critics’ general disinterest. Both Cynthia Erivo and Lupita Nyong’o in Lead Actress, supplanting twice-before-nominated-by-SAG Saoirse Ronan. (Not to mention a complete void of Little Women noms.) A total reset in Supporting Actress.

SAG, for all the things we agree or disagree with, is one of the cleanest awards, with a large nominating committee that is randomly changed out every year. Between Film and TV, the SAG Nominating Committee has 2,500 members out of the 160,000 or so members of SAG/AFTRA. And those selected can only serve once every eight years.

As a point of reference, a U.S. national survey of 15,000 is considered to be a high-quality survey that accurately represents the whole country to within 4% or less. Deeper dives, like the sweeps surveys by Nielsen over the decades, has been 10,000-deep for a nation of over 200 million TV viewers. So the SAG Nom-Comm process is pretty reasonable. And all members vote for the final awards.

Historically, SAG Nom-Comm members take their job quite seriously. I would not argue if it was proposed that the average SNC voter sees a wider swath of movies than the average Academy nominating voter.

Of course, this group of actors also have their biases and favorites. To start with, they are actors and they lean into that perspective. (For instance, did 1917 really get any serious consideration for Best Ensemble? Probably not. And given the nature of the movie, understandably. But that doesn’t define the quality of the movie overall, in this group or others.) The issue of international films remains a millstone around the group’s neck, but maybe the Parasite inclusion is a good sign that things are changing.

No Responses to “The State of Oscars. The One About The Actors Awards.”

Comments are closed.

MCN Commentary & Analysis See All

The Year Of Festivaling Dangerously

David Poland | August 3, 2020

Movie Content Scoreboard, as of July 2020

David Poland | July 23, 2020

Why Write?

David Poland | July 14, 2020

The News Curated by Ray Pride See All

Criterion Boxes the Essential Fellini

August 11, 2020


China Approves Mulan Theatrical Release: Disney Says "When the magnolia blossom opens, it lives up to its reputation and arrives as promised. Import is confirmed and it will soon burst into bloom in theaters; looking forward to meeting you!”

Variety | August 11, 2020


James Mangold on Copland: "It’s what’s going on in our country in general, which is that as you deny resources and opportunities to people, they end up pitted against each other for what little remains. At that time, in the ‘70s and ‘80s, it seemed like it was only getting worse. My movie was about a community of cops and the point of view that emanated from it. My own point of view is more sympathetic toward the communities of color that are besieged. But, in the context of what we’re talking about, it seems to me that we’re never going to unlock the white pathology that participates in this cycle if we don’t unpack what’s underneath this anger. I don’t mean to excuse it but to understand how people end up way out there in a cultish anger, where a uniform and a badge unites them with other like souls, and they start to develop a mercenary and deeply cynical attitude about the people they’re actually there to protect."

Vulture | August 10, 2020


"Amid massive layoffs at Warner Bros, I'm getting word of an absolute bloodbath at DC Comics. Bob Harras is apparently gone; so are editors Mark Doyle, Brian Cunningham and Andy Khouri. Jim Lee still with the company, but no longer publisher. DC Collectibles gone entirely."

Matt Bors: "If there's any point to being owned by a $33 billion company, you'd think it would be that the publishing arm creating IP would actually be underwritten and not demolished."

"These are just the names I’ve heard multiple times. Many other longterm – I’m talking VERY longterm – DC employees have also been let go.Those who had large titles and big salaries are gone. This is a huge and significant downsizing of DC’s publishing operations that will have huge ripple effects across the entire scarred comics industry landscape. It’s impossible to see this as anything but a huge sign of disinterest in the comics publishing business by AT&T, WarnerMedia and the Global Brands division. While other WB divisions faced severe layoffs, losing such a huge swath of the executive leadership at DC is a lot more than just more layoffs."

Twitter | August 10, 2020

The Video Section See All

May Calamawy, Ramy

David Poland | June 15, 2020

The Podcast Section See All