MCN Blogs

By MCN Editor editor@moviecitynews.com

BYO YO-YO, YO

17 Responses to “BYO YO-YO, YO”

  1. Sideshow Bill says:

    Under The Silver Lake. Liked it. Been on my mind. But I don’t know what it is yet. It’s a puzzle movie about…puzzles?

  2. Stella's Boy says:

    I like an interpretation I came across that says it’s making fun of dudes who are obsessed with puzzle movies. I just wish I liked it more. Found Garfield incredibly dull. Not a good protagonist a la Lebowski, Doc, etc. Pretty pervy, too, and I think it misses an opportunity to wrestle with toxic masculinity.

  3. Sideshow Bill says:

    Yea he slept with anyone he could. It held my attention but I didn’t feel much afterwards. High Life puzzled me too but for some reason my emotions were moved. Something there got to me.

    I like that theory though Stella. He was in conspiracies and crap all the stuff he considers clues were so random. But not a real successful movie at getting at what it wanted to. Liked the music though.

  4. palmtree says:

    Yesterday was great although the ending felt a little off somehow. But overall, a lovely time at the movies with lots of fun performances. Feels like a movie I’m gonna be returning to.

  5. Stella's Boy says:

    [Under the Silver Lake SPOILERS] That and there are so many naked and scantily clad women. Women are constantly ogled. There’s a naked dead woman in slow motion. And maybe I missed it but it didn’t seem to me like Mitchell was trying to say something about the male gaze or toxic masculinity.

    I agree the music is good. And it certainly has its moments. I did laugh quite a bit. But overall I don’t think it’s very good.

  6. Pete B. says:

    Gee Stella, you say that like it’s a bad thing. 😉

    And since I haven’t seen it mentioned in the blog: RIP Rip Torn.

  7. Hcat says:

    I’ll have a salty dog in rip’s honor.

  8. Stella's Boy says:

    Ha yeah Pete I mean I’d be lying if I said no part of me enjoys it but my 39 + 1 self looks at it differently than I used to.

  9. Sideshow Bill says:

    What did you think of the new Claire Denis, hillaryyy69 bot? How about that “fuck machine.”

  10. Sideshow Bill says:

    Early Lion King reviews. Uh oh.

    It should still take in the cash though.

  11. movieman says:

    I was going to say the same thing (about “LK”), Bill.
    Variety was wildly effusive, but the other major critics, pretty meh.
    I’m sure it’ll still rake in huge bucks.
    $4-500-million domestic?

    Seeing “Crawl” tonight.
    “Stuber” can wait until the discount house.
    Everything is pretty in a much holding pattern for me until Tarantino arrives.

    Currently reading Tom O’Neill’s “Chaos” which got a lot of pre-pub buzz for its revelatory take on Manson, et al.
    The funny thing is that NBC’s late, great “Aquarius” beat O’Neill’s “scoops” by several years.
    While watching “Aquarius,” I thought it was an imaginative revision of the oft-told (i.e., “Helter Skelter”) saga. I hadn’t realized that much of it was actually fact-based.
    Only makes me love “Aquarius” more.
    Speaking of which, why hasn’t Grey Damon become a star yet?

  12. Sideshow Bill says:

    My Tarantino tix are booked. Man I love AMC A-List. Great investment this Summer

  13. Stella's Boy says:

    I’m seeing Crawl on Tuesday. Fingers crossed. Some seem to really like it but I don’t 100% trust the sources. Looking forward to what others here think.

    Holy shit Annabelle Comes Home is fucking terrible. Like laughably and incompetently bad. Has to be the worst movie I’ve seen this year. I figured at worst it would be an OK matinee with a few decent set pieces. Nope. There’s slow burn and then there’s no burn. 90% is people walking around a house or hiding in a chicken coop. It’s painfully dull. And how in the fuck did this end up rated R? It is toothless and almost totally gore and blood-less. No body count. All those things come to life and never once did I actually believe anyone was in danger. No scares or suspense. No tension. Bland characters. Comical overuse of fog. Terrible pacing. Horrible lighting. Some real howlers like “she’s a beacon for spirits.” Wastes potentially cool creatures/beings like the werewolf (blink and you miss it). It is so, so bad. Just totally and completely inept. Everyone involved should be embarrassed. Rant over. My truck, my rules.

  14. movieman says:

    “Annabelle” is another one that can wait for second-run/discount ($3.50).

    Funny you mentioned the inexplicable “R” rating, SB.
    I’ve felt that way about every “Conjuring” movie (and spin-off) to date (e.g., last fall’s el-lamo “The Nun”).
    Almost makes me think it’s a marketing ploy…if
    “PG-13/Screen Gems/YA” horror wasn’t such a “thing.”
    None of the movies in the franchise(s?) have merited an “R.”
    Certainly not when you consider that every “Saw” movie squeaked by with the exact same rating.

  15. Sideshow Bill says:

    Nice Stella. I have completely forgotten Annabelle Comes Home. It took me a few minutes to ever remember the plot. It’s garbage

  16. movieman says:

    Speaking of “R” ratings that seem a tad excessive, I’m not sure why/how “Crawl” missed out on a “PG-13.”
    Certainly compared w/ earlier Aja movies (e.g., my beloved “High Tension” and his 2006 “Hills Have Eyes” remake), it’s pretty tame.

    “Crawl” IS fun (and refreshingly fat-free at 88 terse minutes), but definitely not deserving of an “R.”
    Gore is minimal–like “Jaws,” it’s mostly left to the imagination–there’s no sex/nudity (duh) and just one, spoken-in-a-moment-of-panic/fear “f**k.”
    “PG-13 horror” all the way.

  17. Stella's Boy says:

    Garbage it is. Time for a timeout on Annabelle movies.

    Yeah I don’t get the ratings at all sometimes. I think about Annabelle Comes Home and it’s lack of sex, language, and graphic violence getting rated R while say something like Taken is PG-13. Supernatural shenanigans merits harsher rating than nonstop shooting and beating and killing?

Leave a Reply

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

“I have a license to carry in New York. Can you believe that? Nobody knows that, [Applause] somebody attacks, somebody attacks me, oh, they’re gonna be shot. Can you imagine? Somebody says, oh, it is Trump, he’s easy pickings what do you say? Right? Oh, boy. What was the famous movie? No. Remember, no remember where he went around and he sort of after his wife was hurt so badly and kill. What?  I — Honestly, Yeah, right, it’s true, but you have many of them. Famous movie. Somebody. You have many of them. Charles Bronson right the late great Charles Bronson name of the movie come on.  , remember that? Ah, we’re gonna cut you up, sir, we’re gonna cut you up, uh-huh.

Bing!

One of the great movies. Charles Bronson, great, Charles Bronson. Great movies. Today you can’t make that movie because it’s not politically correct, right? It’s not politically correct. But could you imagine with Trump? Somebody says, oh, all these big monsters aren’t around he’s easy pickings and then shoot.”
~ Donald Trump

“The scene opens the new movie. It was something Ridley Scott told me a long time ago, when I was on my eighth draft of Blade Runner. He thinks it’s my fault, which it probably is, but it’s also his fault, because he kept coming up with new ideas. This time, he said to me, “What did Deckard do before he was doing this?” I said, “He was doing what he was doing, but not on such a high level. He was retiring androids that weren’t quite like Nexus Sixes, like Nexus Fives, kind of dumb androids.” He said, “So, why don’t we start the movie like that?” He always had a new beginning he wanted to try. Let’s start it on a train, let’s start it on a plane. Let’s start in the snow. Let’s start in the desert. I was writing all that. He said, “What if Deckard is retiring an old version of Nexus?” Right away I was feeling him, like fate, and he said, “There’s a cabin, with soup bubbling on the stove …” When he said soup boiling on the stove, I said, “Don’t say any more! Let me get home.” I wrote a scene that night. Just three or four pages. Deckard retires this not-very-bright droid, and you feel sorry for him. It’s like Steinbeck, Of Mice and Men. It’s just those two guys, with Deckard as the George character and the droid as the Lennie, and Deckard doesn’t want to do it. But then the droid gets mad, and then Deckard has to do it. The audience thinks he killed someone—he reaches into the guy’s mouth and pulls off his whole jaw and we see it says made by tyrell industries or whatever. I wrote that scene and took it to Ridley. I was proud of it. I remember standing and watching him read the whole thing. He loved it, but no. There are a lot of scenes that didn’t get in, but I never forgot that one. I wrote it as the beginning to this new short story called “The Shape of the Final Dog.” I’d always wanted to have a dog that wasn’t real, so I wrote one into the scene at the cabin. After Deckard retires the droid, he’s getting ready to take off and he wants the dog to come with him. The dog rolls over and keeps barking with his mouth closed. The dog’s an android dog. I thought, If there’s ever a new Blade Runner, we’ll have to use this scene. Three weeks go by, and I’m working on the story and it’s ready to hand in. The phone rings. Someone with a posh English accent says, “Would you be available in ten minutes for a call with Ridley Scott?” These people are so important they don’t waste their time on voicemail. I said, “I’ll be here.” Ten minutes go by and Ridley calls. “Hampton! Did you know, I think we’ve got it together to do Blade Runner a second time?” I said, “You finally got so hard up you’re calling me.” I knew they’d been looking for a year. People had been telling me, “You’ve got to call Ridley,” but I was a little chagrined or embarrassed. I thought, He’ll call me if he wants. Ridley said, “We’re interested in whether you have any ideas.” I said, “Funny you should ask that question. Let me read you a paragraph.” I walk over there with the phone and I read him the opening paragraph. And he says, “Fuck me. Can you come to London tomorrow?”
~ Hampton Fancher