By MCN Editor editor@moviecitynews.com

Owen Gleiberman Pads Out 1,400 Words About Rotten Tomatoes

“Yet the preeminence of Rotten Tomatoes comes, I would argue, with a downside… It works like this… Here’s the downside… It’s a phenomenon that I’ve witnessed, anecdotally, over and over again… What happens if you’re a critic who breaks ranks? … The sting of the pressure to conform is omnipresent… The issue isn’t just knee-jerk condemnation; it’s also knee-jerk adulation… Let’s be clear: This is not a conspiracy — by Rotten Tomatoes or anyone else.”
Owen Gleiberman Pads Out 1,400 Words About Rotten Tomatoes

Comments are closed.

Quote Unquotesee all »

“I never accepted the term contrarian. I think that’s offensive, frankly. And my response to that is: if I’m a contrarian, what are other reviewers? What I strive to do is be a good critic, not somebody who simply accepts the product put in front of me. I guess it scares people to think that they don’t have any originality; that they don’t have the capacity to think for themselves.

“There’s a line a lot of reviewers use that I don’t like at all. They say ‘accept the film on its own terms.’ What that really means is, ‘accept the film as it is advertised.’ That’s got nothing to do with criticism. Nothing to do with having a response as a film watcher. A thinking person has to analyze what’s on screen, not simply rubber-stamp it or kowtow to marketing.”m

“To me, everything does have a political component and I think it’s an interesting way to look at art. It’s one way that makes film reviewing, I think, a politically relevant form of journalism. We do live in a political world, and we bring our political sense to the movies with us – unless you’re the kind of person who goes to the movies and shuts off the outside world. I’m not that kind of person.”
~ Armond White to Luke Buckmaster

“One of comedy’s defining pathologies, alongside literal pathologies like narcissism and self-loathing, is its swaggering certainty that it is part of the political vanguard, while upholding one of the most rigidly patriarchal hierarchies of any art form.”
~ Lindy West