MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Tweet Review: Beauty & The Beast

Screen Shot 2017-03-17 at 5.56.36 PM

3 Responses to “Tweet Review: Beauty & The Beast”

  1. EtGuild2 says:

    Your love of musicals is showing. I’m not a huge fan of these things, but “by far?” I’m not sure anyone else would argue this is “far better” than TJB or CINDERELLA.

  2. David Poland says:

    I like Jungle Book, but it is insanely overrated. Cinderella just isn’t very good.

  3. Hallick says:

    I just re-watched the original with the family a couple of weeks ago and saw this one yesterday. Emma Watson is a fine Belle, but…she’s just fine, not more. There were a few times, like during “Be Our Guest”, where it reminded me A LOT of watching that play-along-and-watch-the-puppet-do-its-thing acting of an unengaged guest celebrity on The Muppet Show.

    But most everything they did to alter and open up the original story worked better than I would have expected (Kevin Kline with the re-written father character, Luke Evans’ Gaston, the enchanted snow palace in June, the magic map visit to Paris, more detail added to Belle and the Beast’s blossoming friendship, etc).

    The extra sorceress material wasn’t better though, being too easy to spot early on and didn’t add anything necessary to the climax. My daughter also noticed that the worst technical decision, the digital alteration of Beast’s voice, sounded just like like Kylo Ren. They should have bolstered Stevens’ voice in more subtle ways rather than make Beast sound like a creepy cop show kidnapper making ransom demands.

    But all in all, it’s kind of a great “good” movie without actually being a great movie.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

“I never accepted the term contrarian. I think that’s offensive, frankly. And my response to that is: if I’m a contrarian, what are other reviewers? What I strive to do is be a good critic, not somebody who simply accepts the product put in front of me. I guess it scares people to think that they don’t have any originality; that they don’t have the capacity to think for themselves.

“There’s a line a lot of reviewers use that I don’t like at all. They say ‘accept the film on its own terms.’ What that really means is, ‘accept the film as it is advertised.’ That’s got nothing to do with criticism. Nothing to do with having a response as a film watcher. A thinking person has to analyze what’s on screen, not simply rubber-stamp it or kowtow to marketing.”m

“To me, everything does have a political component and I think it’s an interesting way to look at art. It’s one way that makes film reviewing, I think, a politically relevant form of journalism. We do live in a political world, and we bring our political sense to the movies with us – unless you’re the kind of person who goes to the movies and shuts off the outside world. I’m not that kind of person.”
~ Armond White to Luke Buckmaster

“One of comedy’s defining pathologies, alongside literal pathologies like narcissism and self-loathing, is its swaggering certainty that it is part of the political vanguard, while upholding one of the most rigidly patriarchal hierarchies of any art form.”
~ Lindy West