MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

BYOB: RIP, Bill Paxton

byob_paxton

11 Responses to “BYOB: RIP, Bill Paxton”

  1. Pete B. says:

    Good God, that truly sucks. Bill Paxton was great. He could put a spin on a line of dialog and truly make it his own. And his directorial debut of Frailty was vastly underappreciated. You will be missed sir. You will be missed. I went out and bought the Hatfields & McCoys today just to honor you and your sole Emmy win.

  2. Movieman says:

    “Big Love” to Bill Paxton.
    R.I.P., sir.

  3. LBB says:

    A true Texas boy who never lost the Texas or the boy. Made it through sheer talent, charisma, and spark. He made everything he did his own and leaves behind great work large and small.

  4. Geoff says:

    Really a strong career as career character actor now looking back on it – Aliens to Near Dark to One False Move to True Lies to Titanic to A Simple Plan…..Didn’t seem to have as many plum roles in the early ’00’s but NICE resurgence just a couple of years back with Edge of Tomorrow and Nightcrawler! RIP Hudson.

  5. Sideshow Bill says:

    I forgot he was in NIGHTCRAWLER. he was always great. As teen film geek I became obsessed with him after Aliens and Weird Science. He was a multi-talented guy. Even had a new wave band called Martini Ranch. And Frailty is fantastic, and it doesn’t hurt that it has a great Powers Boothe performance. I mentioned A Simple Plan in the other thread. That movie is so oddly overlooked considering the talent involved, and the quality. Raimi has never been more controlled.

    I feel like a part of my youth died with him today. I shed a few tears this morning. It really does hurt. Much like when Phillip Seymour Hoffman passed.

    RIP Bill. Thank you for everything.

  6. Mike says:

    Wasn’t he in porn before making it in real movies? I thought I read that somewhere. (Not that there’s anything wrong with that.)

  7. TrackerBacker says:

    Mike: No.

  8. Stella's Boy says:

    Only actor to ever be killed by an alien, predator, and terminator. He was such a treasure. This is bullshit.

  9. CG says:

    Damn shame. He was usually the most interesting thing on Big Love, even though he rarely had the biggest/showiest moments.

  10. Krazy Eyes says:

    A real shame. He as a very talented actor, director, and by many reports an all round decent guy.

    As a huge fan of Frailty, this news is especially tough since it was recently reported that Paxton was reteaming with Frailty scribe Brent Hanley on an adaptation of Joe Lansdale’s The Bottoms.

    And speaking of Hanley, WTF happened to him? Dude comes roaring out of the gate with such an exceptional debut screenplay and then “poof” nada for over a decade — unless you count that Masters of Horror. I’m guessing he’s making a living script doctoring or selling specs but damn.

  11. Sideshow Bill says:

    He was good on Big Love but I watched that for Harry Dean. They made good foils.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

What’s up with your people mover shot, where it seems like people are kind of floating along?
Oh, my signature shot? That’s just a new way for people to move! It’s really become my Alfred Hitchcock cameo. I did not invent that shot, but Ernest and I did it on the set of Mo Better Blues, when Shorty had to walk [through the park], and I thought, “Let’s try it.” But after that, we tried to have a reason for it. For example, that wonderful sequence in Malcolm X where you hear the great song, “A Change Is Gonna Come.” The final scene is like that, Malcolm floating along to his destiny. In 25th Hour, after Philip Seymour Hoffman has kissed Anna Paquin, we did a shot like that, and it shows his state of mind. In Inside Man, after Denzel thinks he’s witnessed the murder of a hostage, we did the floating shot there.

So you just like the way it looks?
Yeah!
~ Spike Lee To Matt Zoller Seitz

“I never accepted the term contrarian. I think that’s offensive, frankly. And my response to that is: if I’m a contrarian, what are other reviewers? What I strive to do is be a good critic, not somebody who simply accepts the product put in front of me. I guess it scares people to think that they don’t have any originality; that they don’t have the capacity to think for themselves.

“There’s a line a lot of reviewers use that I don’t like at all. They say ‘accept the film on its own terms.’ What that really means is, ‘accept the film as it is advertised.’ That’s got nothing to do with criticism. Nothing to do with having a response as a film watcher. A thinking person has to analyze what’s on screen, not simply rubber-stamp it or kowtow to marketing.”m

“To me, everything does have a political component and I think it’s an interesting way to look at art. It’s one way that makes film reviewing, I think, a politically relevant form of journalism. We do live in a political world, and we bring our political sense to the movies with us – unless you’re the kind of person who goes to the movies and shuts off the outside world. I’m not that kind of person.”
~ Armond White to Luke Buckmaster