Z
MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Fun Video: Courtroom Movies: Hollywood’s Most Hackneyed Genre

25 Responses to “Fun Video: Courtroom Movies: Hollywood’s Most Hackneyed Genre”

  1. arisp says:

    Just re-watched THE VERDICT the other night for the 394839th time. the pinnacle of court room filmmaking.

  2. lazarus says:

    I projected Anatomy Of A Murder for friends last night, and as much as I like Lumet’s film, I’d put Preminger’s at the very top.

    Yes, The Verdict has one of Newman’s best performances (if not his very best), but Anatomy has a pitch-perfect James Stewart, and that supporting cast? George C. Scott at his slimiest, Lee Remick at her sexiest, Ben Gazzara, Arthur O’Donnell, Eve Arden. And the script is so detailed in terms of the legal proceedings, but filled with laugh-out-loud moments.

  3. arisp says:

    Two things bugged me about The Verdict though –

    1) What was Charlotte Rampling’s motivation to double cross Newman? Why did she do what she did? It couldn’t have been only for the measly $500. Her character was slightly undefined

    2) If Nurse Costello’s testimony was supposed to be stricken from the record, and stricken from jurors’ minds, how did the jurors decide for the prosecution? Newman had nothing other than the nurse’s testimony.

  4. anghus says:

    arisp, the answer to both questions:

    GRAVITAS

  5. christian says:

    ANATOMY OF A MURDER still the best template…

  6. The Pope says:

    arisp,
    to reinforce what anghus said, it is because Rampling’s character is now on the downward slope that Newman’s character was at the start of the film. And as for the jury’s verdict… it’s an answer to Newman’s “prayer.” And, as anghus says it adds gravitas because it dares to suggest that we might have to answer to something greater than the law. The religious motifs are rife throughout the picture, from the opening credits, to the fires burning in the bishop’s office etc.

    I liked the clips that were put together but fun as they all were, the one that stopped me in my tracks was The Verdict. Anatomy is very good, but damn it, The Verdict was immaculate. The jury’s decision touches my heart each time. It’s not schmaltzy. The film earned that moment.

  7. Sam says:

    No question that there are a lot of formulaic courtroom scenes in movies and TV, but I’m not sure if this montage does a good job at distilling the lack of creativity, especially in pulling legitimately inspired courtroom dramas into the mix.

    Thing is, a lot of the stuff that looks like movie tropes — the swearing in of witnesses, objections, asking the jury for a verdict — is authentic courtroom procedure. So how should these movies have done these things instead, exactly?

  8. palmtree says:

    I agree with Sam. Calling it the “most hackneyed” requires more than just a few shows using the same courtroom procedures. Wouldn’t it entail showing how the stories themselves are formulaic and predictable? Or how the characters are all drawn the same way or how certain dramatic beats are repeated? Or….ugh….it just isn’t the most hackneyed Hollywood genre. What about rom coms?

  9. christian says:

    I like watching Bruce Willis in the court behind Newman – did the extra think he’d be getting paid 5 million dollars a few years later?

  10. YancySkancy says:

    I’m with Sam; this is not only uninspired, it’s rather insulting to the many excerpted films that went out of their way NOT to be hackneyed. Also, it seems about half of these clips are from parodies of the genre, which isn’t exactly fair play either.

  11. Lex says:

    “I projected Anatomy Of A Murder for friends last night…”

    Wow, sounds like a fucking blast.

  12. christian says:

    Speaking of Most Hackneyed….

  13. Lex says:

    Speaking of courtrooms…

    I’ve asked this before, never get answers. But what do movie bloggers do when they get jury duty? In L.A. you got summoned almost once a year. I’ve never, ever heard of like McWeeny or Faraci or Wells or Poland missing a big FESTIVAL because of jury duty. Imagine if Sasha Stone got a jury summons and had to report in late November then got sequestered until March and had to miss all the Oscars and everything?

    I know you can delay it to off times of the year, but I’ve never seen any of the usual suspects, all of whom live in L.A., miss a SINGLE MOVIE because of jury duty. Their employment situation is so nebulous, how do you explain it to a judge who doesn’t give a shit?

  14. Joe Leydon says:

    I can’t speak for anyone else, but I have found over the years that as soon as I identify myself as a journalist, it’s practically a race to see who’ll strike me from the list first, the prosecution or the defense. Indeed, I’ve been on two juries in my entire life — and both cases (including a sanity hearing) were over and done in a single day.

  15. Lex says:

    Yeah, but you were a newspaper critic. Not like guys who write at HitFix are going to a physical office where they’re hanging out in the breakroom with a guy on the crime beat.

  16. Joe Leydon says:

    Actually, I haven’t hung out in a newspaper office for nearly 18 years. But, hey, if that is the perception that gets me out of jury duty, so be it.

  17. leahnz says:

    my top ten fave courtroom movies (in no order, just what I think of):

    * In cold blood (brooks)

    * In the name of the father (Sheridan)

    * To kill a mockingbird (Mulligan)

    * And justice for all (Jewison)

    * The verdict (Lumet)

    * Philadelphia (Demme)

    * My cousin vinny (Lynn)

    * The accused (Kaplan)

    * The crucible (Hytner)

    * Paths of Glory (Kubrick)

  18. bulldog68 says:

    No A Few Good Men Leahnz? The extended JFK courtroom scene always gets me whenever it’s on cable. I’ll add the original 12 Angry Men, A Soldier’s Story and A Time to Kill as some of my faves.

  19. christian says:

    Who actually would know anybody’s life/work schedule or give a shit?

    And JUDGEMENT AT NUREMBERG is a fave courtroom epic. Not to mention MY COUSIN VINNY….

  20. leahnz says:

    I really like ‘a few good men’ bulldog but i don’t think it would make it into my all-time faves – it doesn’t have the visceral punch for me but it’s a good, tense drama – and it’s hard to leave ’12 Angry Men’ out too; I haven’t seen ‘Judgement at Nuremberg’, ‘Soldier’s story’ or ‘A Time to Kill’ in a long time, so i think one problem for me is if i don’t have it on dvd/blu and watch something occasionally then in fades for me, perhaps unfairly. Another one that could possibly sneak in the top 10 for me is Beresford’s ‘Breaker Morant’, but as always i have a hell of a time making set lists because i have such a hard time narrowing things down to a set number and always feel like i’m leaving something great out.

  21. Triple Option says:

    Judgement at Nuremberg would be extremely high on my list as well. Paths of Glory is one of my favorite Kubrick movies but even though the vast majority of the film is dealing with court hearings and procedure, that always defaults to war movie in my mind whenever I think of it.

    I’ll admit, I was expecting to see more repeated phrases, ala the Sorkin videos that reprise many of his same lines that find themselves repeated in different shows and movies.

  22. cadavra says:

    Nobody’s mentioned INHERIT THE WIND or WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION yet? Sheesh!

  23. Foamy Squirrel says:

    Cad – I’m surprised Mockingbird even showed up. Shit, I did Morant back in school (along with Unman, Wittering and Zigo), so it doesn’t really count either.

    Remember, films before the 80s don’t exist. 😉

  24. christian says:

    And INHERIT THE WIND – still packs a punch today and sadly, it still relevant..

  25. Triple Option says:

    I actually was going to bring up Wit for Process. Not sure how I missed it. Kinda like going into a store, picking a couple of things out and forgetting what you intended to get.

Leave a Reply

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

Tsangari: With my next film, White Knuckles, it comes with a budget — it’s going to be a huge new world for me. As always when I enter into a new thing, don’t you wonder how it’s going to be and how much of yourself you are going to have to sacrifice? The ballet of all of this. I’m already imaging the choreography — not of the camera, but the choreography of actually bringing it to life. It is as fascinating as the shooting itself. I find the producing as exciting as the directing. The one informs the other. There is this producer-director hat that I constantly wear. I’ve been thinking about these early auteurs, like Howard Hawks and John Ford and Preston Sturges—all of these guys basically were hired by the studio, and I doubt they had final cut, and somehow they had films that now we can say they had their signatures.  There are different ways of being creative within the parameters and limitations of production. The only thing you cannot negotiate is stupidity.
Filmmaker: And unfortunately, there is an abundance of that in the world.
Tsangari: This is the only big risk: stupidity. Everything else is completely worked out in the end.
~ Chevalier‘s Rachel Athina Tsangari

“The middle-range movies that I was doing have largely either stopped being made, or they’ve moved to television, now that television is a go-to medium for directors who can’t get work in theatricals, because there are so few theatricals being made. But also with the new miniseries concept, you can tell a long story in detail without having to cram it all into 90 minutes. You don’t have to cut the characters and take out the secondary people. You can actually put them all on a big canvas. And it is a big canvas, because people have bigger screens now, so there’s no aesthetic difference between the way you shoot a movie and the way you shoot a TV show.

“Which is all for the good. But what’s happened in the interim is that theatrical movies being a spectacle business are now either giant blockbuster movies that run three hours—even superhero movies run three hours, they used to run like 58 minutes!—and the others, which are dysfunctional family independent movies or the slob comedy or the kiddie movie, and those are all low-budget. So the middle ground of movies that were about things, they’re just gone. Or else they’re on HBO. Like the Bryan Cranston LBJ movie, which years ago would’ve been made for theaters.

“You’ve got people like Paul Schrader and Walter Hill who can’t get their movies theatrically distributed because there’s no market for it. So they end up going to VOD, and VOD is a model from which no one makes any money, because most of the time, as soon as they get on the site, they’re pirated. So the whole model of the system right now is completely broken. And whether or not anybody’s going to try to fix, or if it even can be fixed, I don’t know. But it’s certainly not the same business that I got into in the ’70s.”
~ Joe Dante

Z Weekend Report