Z
MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Review-ish: Django Unchained

(NSFW image  – which is why I didn’t just put it on top of the review – that likely inspired a scene in Django)

I don’t think I have a ton to add to the conversation about Django Unchained.

It is not a special film. It feels a lot like Tarantino playing out a contract. (No, there is no contract to which I am referring.) Or maybe someone with some real talent, but with no real ambition beyond imitating Tarantino.

It has laughs. It has a ton of violence. It has well over 100 uses of the word “nigger.”

I’d sit through it again and not suffer. But if I don’t, I don’t think I’ll be missing anything of note.

But for me, it was missing the curve ball that makes Tarantino interesting, even in his lesser works. It’s a 2 or 3 joke film. And those jokes repeat over and over and over again. Most of the audience seemed fine with that. I found myself oddly bored in a film that is so relentlessly in the audience’s face… perhaps the most aggressive piece Tarantino has ever made, even more so than the Kill Bills.

The tech side is excellent. No complaints. Robert Richardson is still a master. Acting performances are also uniformly strong. But I preferred the character Chris Waltz plays the first time I saw Robert Culp & Bill Cosby doing that schtick on “I Spy.”

The only exceptional element in this film, for me, was Samuel L. Jackson who is transformed into Uncle Ben – I mean, right off that old box – to the point where his head seems to be another shape. And he balances attitude and rage and a surface calm in the one thing in this film that seriously deserves Oscar consideration.

For a movie I didn’t love (and certainly didn’t hate), I didn’t mind the looooong running time. But the film lives on a hamster wheel of repetition that I wish someone had been able to get Tarantino to cut down. And really, I wish there was a point. Comparisons to Inglorious Basterds make no sense to me, as there were a load of interesting, subversive ideas in Inglorious Basterds. I can’t think of a single one in this film. And a love story? It’s a long story like Eraser is a love story.

I look at the trailer and TV spots and I see what this film was meant to be… good, fun, mostly brainless pulp. But it hangs around so long that the failure of QT to find anything to say becomes all too apparent.

I could pick the thing apart, but that would be silly. It’s not that kind of movie. Either you get on the ride and give yourself to it or not. That doesn’t mean that the film has no responsibility to entertain, but it does try. It literal pulls down its pants… or Jamie Foxx’s… and like so much in the film, it leads nowhere… except for a cool moment out of context.

This is the first Tarantino film that could have been made by Robert Rodriguez. Good or bad. You make that call.

11 Responses to “Review-ish: Django Unchained”

  1. spassky says:

    WTF where is that NSFW photo from???

    (Besides the bathroom at Johnny Rockets)

  2. Think says:

    “This is the first Tarantino film that could have been made by Robert Rodriguez. Good or bad. You make that call.”

    This is the most bullshit statement I’ve read in a long time. Rodriguez has never composed an image or constructed a scene that touches anything in this movie. This is the work of a master. Rodriguez is a B-movie mediocrity. I feel like you have no grasp of filmmaking if you can’t see or feel the difference here.

  3. StellaPD says:

    So QT diehards are going to become completely unhinged by any review that doesn’t proclaim Django a masterpiece?

  4. Sam says:

    David: Surprised not to see a dissection of the BFCA noms, which I believe you vote for, right?

  5. Big G says:

    So I guess someone might be calling bullshit if DiCaprio wins the Supporting Actor Oscar. I mean Poland doesn’t even mention him.

    And I wonder is Spike Lee will be going apeshit on QT yet again for that word being used 100 times.

  6. Joe Leydon says:

    It would appear David and that other fellow are vastly outnumbered. For now.

  7. Breedlove says:

    Lex posted something on Elsewhere that I felt like I could have written myself word for word, and almost posted here earlier today. Fair or unfair, I have a strong dislike for Kerry Washington, mainly because of seeing her on Bill Maher. She comes across as this super uptight, humorless, wannabe intellectual…I found her so painful on that show a couple times that I wish they got someone else for this flick…

  8. Big G says:

    Well, if you read that Owen Glieberman review in EW he and David are actually in total agreement.

  9. christian says:

    Lex only likes white women. End of his insight.

  10. Hendhogan says:

    I am greatly looking forward to the Asylum version: “Jdango Unroped.”

Leave a Reply

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

“To be a critic is to be a workaholic. Workaholism is socially conditioned: viewed favourably by exploiters, it’s generally ruinous to a worker’s mental health. When T.S. Eliot said criticism was as inevitable as breathing, he failed to mention that, respiratory problems notwithstanding, breathing is easy. Criticism is reflexive before reflective: to formalise/industrialise an involuntary instinct requires time, effort and discipline. The reason we seek remuneration, as opposed to the self-hatred of being a scab, is because all labour should be waged…

“Criticism, so the cliché by now goes, is dying. None of the panel discussions on its death agony, however—including those in which I’ve formally participated—come at it from the wider perspective that the problem surely needs. They defend the ways in which criticism functions in relation to the industry and to the public, but they fail to contextualise these relationships as defined by ultimately rotten and self-harming imperatives.

“Criticism was a noble profession so long as only a few could practice it for money; when the field expands, as it has with a so-called ‘democratisation’ of our practice, those few lose their political power. Competition grows and markets are undercut: publications are naturally going to start paying less. Precarity is both cause and effect of a surplus workforce: the reason you’re only as good as your last article is because there are plenty of other folks who can write the next one in your place. The daily grind is: pitch, or perish.

B”ut criticism, so a counter-cliché goes, is not dying. An irony: this is an elite sport that is no longer elite in terms of who is able to practice it, but in economic terms it’s clutching to a perverse and outmoded hierarchical structure. It’s more meritocratic than ever, now: which is to say it isn’t meritocratic at all. That’s a paradox in bad need of a resolution…”

~ Michael Pattison Manifestoes Film Criticism

“It’s easy to forget when you’re reading a critic every single week or multiple times a week, that most of us who do this job, and have been doing it for a long time, understand that this is basically a parasitic profession. I don’t mean in the sense that we’re evil bloodsucking creatures, but we couldn’t exist if we didn’t have something to analyze. And I’m always conscious of that. So whether I like or don’t like a particular thing you do, my point of view is always that of an appreciator. I just like to be in the world that you create.”
~ Matt Zoller Seitz To Sam Esmail

Z Weekend Report