<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gurus o&#8217; Gold: The First Returns Are In!!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/gurus-o-gold-the-first-returns-are-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/gurus-o-gold-the-first-returns-are-in/</link>
	<description>Hollywood&#039;s Homepage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 03:18:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: movielocke</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/gurus-o-gold-the-first-returns-are-in/#comment-882384</link>
		<dc:creator>movielocke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 02:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=160783#comment-882384</guid>
		<description>Picture, I hope we get 9ish again, or ten, the new variable rule is dumb, 10 nominees is superb:

1. Lincoln
2. Argo
3. Les Miserables
4. Silver Linings Playbook
5. Django Unchained
6. The Hobbit
7. Life of Pi
8. Flight
9. Zero Dark Thirty
10. Amour
r/u Beasts of the Southern Wild, Anna Karenina, This is 40

Director, only confident that these top two will survive the remaining season to the nomination, very competitive this year 3-5 could all fall out:
1. Spielberg
2. Hooper
3. Russell
4. Affleck
5. Haneke
6. Bigelow
r/u Jackson, Tarentino, Lee, Zemeckis, Apatow

Actor, this is the most competitive I remember the category being, top two are set, but the next three could change wildly (as wildly as former frontrunner Phoenix nearly being out of the race at this point):

1. Daniel Day Lewis
2. Denzel Washington
3. Hugh Jackman
4. Bradley Cooper
5. Jean Louis Trintignant
6. Joaquin Phoenix
r/u John Hawkes, Jamie Foxx, poor-man&#039;s-Toby-Jones, Tom Holland, Paul Rudd

Actress, so wide open it is fascinating, Lawrence is winning and a free-for-all on the nominations:

1. Jennifer Lawrence
2. Quvenzhané Wallis
3. Emmanuelle Riva
4. Kiera Knightley
5. Helen Mirren
6. Marion Cotillard
r/u Naomi Watts, Jessica Chastain, Leslie Mann

Best Supporting Actor, just a crazy category with Django, 0D30, Hobbit and Les Mis yet to drop only TLJ is assured:

1. Tommy Lee Jones
2. Alan Arkin
3. Russell Crowe
4. Robert DeNiro
5. Leonardo Dicaprio
6. Richard Armitage
r/u Christoph Waltz, Dwight Henry, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Jude Law, Javiar Bardem, Matthew McConaughey, Ewan McGregor

Supporting Actress, the Les Mis girls, will they tie Tom Jones or surpass it?:

1. Anne Hathaway
2. Sally Field
3. Amy Adams
4. Helen Hunt
5. Samantha Barks
6. Kerry Washington
r/u Maggie Smith, Amanda Seyfried, Frances McDormand, Kelly Reilly, Helena Bonham Carter, Barbera Streisand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picture, I hope we get 9ish again, or ten, the new variable rule is dumb, 10 nominees is superb:</p>
<p>1. Lincoln<br />
2. Argo<br />
3. Les Miserables<br />
4. Silver Linings Playbook<br />
5. Django Unchained<br />
6. The Hobbit<br />
7. Life of Pi<br />
8. Flight<br />
9. Zero Dark Thirty<br />
10. Amour<br />
r/u Beasts of the Southern Wild, Anna Karenina, This is 40</p>
<p>Director, only confident that these top two will survive the remaining season to the nomination, very competitive this year 3-5 could all fall out:<br />
1. Spielberg<br />
2. Hooper<br />
3. Russell<br />
4. Affleck<br />
5. Haneke<br />
6. Bigelow<br />
r/u Jackson, Tarentino, Lee, Zemeckis, Apatow</p>
<p>Actor, this is the most competitive I remember the category being, top two are set, but the next three could change wildly (as wildly as former frontrunner Phoenix nearly being out of the race at this point):</p>
<p>1. Daniel Day Lewis<br />
2. Denzel Washington<br />
3. Hugh Jackman<br />
4. Bradley Cooper<br />
5. Jean Louis Trintignant<br />
6. Joaquin Phoenix<br />
r/u John Hawkes, Jamie Foxx, poor-man&#8217;s-Toby-Jones, Tom Holland, Paul Rudd</p>
<p>Actress, so wide open it is fascinating, Lawrence is winning and a free-for-all on the nominations:</p>
<p>1. Jennifer Lawrence<br />
2. Quvenzhané Wallis<br />
3. Emmanuelle Riva<br />
4. Kiera Knightley<br />
5. Helen Mirren<br />
6. Marion Cotillard<br />
r/u Naomi Watts, Jessica Chastain, Leslie Mann</p>
<p>Best Supporting Actor, just a crazy category with Django, 0D30, Hobbit and Les Mis yet to drop only TLJ is assured:</p>
<p>1. Tommy Lee Jones<br />
2. Alan Arkin<br />
3. Russell Crowe<br />
4. Robert DeNiro<br />
5. Leonardo Dicaprio<br />
6. Richard Armitage<br />
r/u Christoph Waltz, Dwight Henry, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Jude Law, Javiar Bardem, Matthew McConaughey, Ewan McGregor</p>
<p>Supporting Actress, the Les Mis girls, will they tie Tom Jones or surpass it?:</p>
<p>1. Anne Hathaway<br />
2. Sally Field<br />
3. Amy Adams<br />
4. Helen Hunt<br />
5. Samantha Barks<br />
6. Kerry Washington<br />
r/u Maggie Smith, Amanda Seyfried, Frances McDormand, Kelly Reilly, Helena Bonham Carter, Barbera Streisand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Monelli</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/gurus-o-gold-the-first-returns-are-in/#comment-881328</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Monelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=160783#comment-881328</guid>
		<description>Feinberg, not Feinstein.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feinberg, not Feinstein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kholby</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/gurus-o-gold-the-first-returns-are-in/#comment-881248</link>
		<dc:creator>Kholby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 23:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=160783#comment-881248</guid>
		<description>Nicole Kidman deserves that 5th spot for sure. In a just world Nicole would win, but that&#039;s not happening; however, at the very least she deserves a nomination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicole Kidman deserves that 5th spot for sure. In a just world Nicole would win, but that&#8217;s not happening; however, at the very least she deserves a nomination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/gurus-o-gold-the-first-returns-are-in/#comment-880984</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 01:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=160783#comment-880984</guid>
		<description>I believe Nicole Kidman deserves a higher spot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Nicole Kidman deserves a higher spot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felipe</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/gurus-o-gold-the-first-returns-are-in/#comment-880958</link>
		<dc:creator>Felipe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 22:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=160783#comment-880958</guid>
		<description>Marion Cotillard gives the best female performance of this year and she deserved her second oscar nomination and oscar winning</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marion Cotillard gives the best female performance of this year and she deserved her second oscar nomination and oscar winning</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/gurus-o-gold-the-first-returns-are-in/#comment-880860</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 20:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=160783#comment-880860</guid>
		<description>Does the Gurus know that ALWAYS since 1936 the categories of supporting actor and actress has had at least 1 newcomer? It&#039;s silly to have 18 returning nominees between the 4 categories!!!!

Samantha Barks is happening, Ewan McGregor is happening, Hugh Jackman is happening, maybe Matthew McConaughey, Richard Gere can also happen (BFCA good score and a Globe nomination assured).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the Gurus know that ALWAYS since 1936 the categories of supporting actor and actress has had at least 1 newcomer? It&#8217;s silly to have 18 returning nominees between the 4 categories!!!!</p>
<p>Samantha Barks is happening, Ewan McGregor is happening, Hugh Jackman is happening, maybe Matthew McConaughey, Richard Gere can also happen (BFCA good score and a Globe nomination assured).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/gurus-o-gold-the-first-returns-are-in/#comment-880836</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 19:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=160783#comment-880836</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s worth pointing out that the chart doesn&#039;t suggest that Hunt is more likely to WIN an Oscar than Hathaway, just that she&#039;s more likely to be nominated for one.

It&#039;s a small difference, but sometimes that happens.  Sometimes I think, well, it&#039;ll be a stretch for this whatever to get nominated, but if it does, it ought to have a good chance at a win.

That may be the case here.  Hunt is kind of an obvious one to nominate, given that she&#039;s the female lead in a two-actor film and has a very challenging and nuanced role.  Hathaway, by contrast, might have a tougher time, as votes for that film might be split between its larger cast.  It&#039;s also more of an unknown quantity at this point, given that the film has not yet been widely seen (I think?).  I still think she&#039;ll be nominated, but you can make the case that she won&#039;t.

But once the nominations are in, I don&#039;t see Hunt snagging the win, whereas Hathaway will probably be an attractive target for votes if she turns up on the short list.

I agree that it&#039;s more likely Hathaway&#039;s year than Hunt&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s worth pointing out that the chart doesn&#8217;t suggest that Hunt is more likely to WIN an Oscar than Hathaway, just that she&#8217;s more likely to be nominated for one.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a small difference, but sometimes that happens.  Sometimes I think, well, it&#8217;ll be a stretch for this whatever to get nominated, but if it does, it ought to have a good chance at a win.</p>
<p>That may be the case here.  Hunt is kind of an obvious one to nominate, given that she&#8217;s the female lead in a two-actor film and has a very challenging and nuanced role.  Hathaway, by contrast, might have a tougher time, as votes for that film might be split between its larger cast.  It&#8217;s also more of an unknown quantity at this point, given that the film has not yet been widely seen (I think?).  I still think she&#8217;ll be nominated, but you can make the case that she won&#8217;t.</p>
<p>But once the nominations are in, I don&#8217;t see Hunt snagging the win, whereas Hathaway will probably be an attractive target for votes if she turns up on the short list.</p>
<p>I agree that it&#8217;s more likely Hathaway&#8217;s year than Hunt&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Airstrike</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/gurus-o-gold-the-first-returns-are-in/#comment-880833</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airstrike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 19:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=160783#comment-880833</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who thinks it&#039;s tragic not to have Christopher Walken anywhere on the list for Best Supporting Actor for The Late Quartet.  He stole the movie, he killed it, and btw it&#039;s Christopher F$&amp;*#@G Walken! Am I missing something? This doesn&#039;t make any sense whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who thinks it&#8217;s tragic not to have Christopher Walken anywhere on the list for Best Supporting Actor for The Late Quartet.  He stole the movie, he killed it, and btw it&#8217;s Christopher F$&amp;*#@G Walken! Am I missing something? This doesn&#8217;t make any sense whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/gurus-o-gold-the-first-returns-are-in/#comment-880832</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 18:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=160783#comment-880832</guid>
		<description>I was hoping that Life Of PI would be a box office failure so I would never have to see it but the damn early nominations have screwed things up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping that Life Of PI would be a box office failure so I would never have to see it but the damn early nominations have screwed things up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YancySkancy</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/gurus-o-gold-the-first-returns-are-in/#comment-880807</link>
		<dc:creator>YancySkancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 17:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=160783#comment-880807</guid>
		<description>That should be Samantha Barks, not Banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should be Samantha Barks, not Banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
