<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Blush Review: Zero Dark Thirty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/first-blush-review-zero-dark-thirty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/first-blush-review-zero-dark-thirty/</link>
	<description>Hollywood&#039;s Homepage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 05:26:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Milano</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/first-blush-review-zero-dark-thirty/#comment-888194</link>
		<dc:creator>Milano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 02:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=162624#comment-888194</guid>
		<description>More importantly, how rough is the shaky camerawork in &quot;Zero Dark Thirty&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More importantly, how rough is the shaky camerawork in &#8220;Zero Dark Thirty&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jesse</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/first-blush-review-zero-dark-thirty/#comment-888097</link>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 21:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=162624#comment-888097</guid>
		<description>Cadavra, to be fair, they did put out an epic long-ish trailer for Cloud Atlas that sold it as a big-scope movie with a lot of stars. It might&#039;ve even made it look like more of a sci-fi movie than it really was. And that movie is tough to sell.

But I do agree that someone should&#039;ve been able to market it to $50 million or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cadavra, to be fair, they did put out an epic long-ish trailer for Cloud Atlas that sold it as a big-scope movie with a lot of stars. It might&#8217;ve even made it look like more of a sci-fi movie than it really was. And that movie is tough to sell.</p>
<p>But I do agree that someone should&#8217;ve been able to market it to $50 million or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jesse</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/first-blush-review-zero-dark-thirty/#comment-888094</link>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 21:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=162624#comment-888094</guid>
		<description>Yancy, A.I. should&#039;ve been on my 2001 favorites list -- that would be number 5, after those other four, and I do love that movie (it&#039;s less absolutely perfect than the others I mentioned, but a great one nonetheless). I also really like Wet Hot American Summer and Monsters Inc. and the Man Who Wasn&#039;t There. But I don&#039;t have a great bounty of 2001 movies I love. I&#039;m not big on Mulholland Drive or Gosford Park or Spirited Away. 

And anyway, a great movie year for me is more of a bulk/volume game. There are lots of years where I can find five or six movies I really liked. I mean, really, if a movie year isn&#039;t yielding that much, it&#039;s pretty lousy. But the years when I can name 20 or 30, that&#039;s something a bit more special (and how could I forget Jesse James in 2007? LOVE that one, too). 

Double D, I&#039;m with you on UP as the kind of 2009, and Hurt Locker and Avatar being more good than great, but 2009 also offered: Inglourious Basterds, The Brothers Bloom, A Serious Man, Fantastic Mr. Fox, Adventureland, Where the Wild Things Are, Observe and Report, Star Trek, Funny People, The Girlfriend Experience AND The Informant, Away We Go, Moon... a volume game!

2003 is the one that sticks out for me as pretty middling. Favorites that year: Kill Bill Volume 1, Once Upon a Time in Mexico (really), Big Fish, American Splendor, Lost in Translation... some others in &#039;03 that I like, but dries up pretty quickly after that top five (and that top five isn&#039;t as strong as some other years).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yancy, A.I. should&#8217;ve been on my 2001 favorites list &#8212; that would be number 5, after those other four, and I do love that movie (it&#8217;s less absolutely perfect than the others I mentioned, but a great one nonetheless). I also really like Wet Hot American Summer and Monsters Inc. and the Man Who Wasn&#8217;t There. But I don&#8217;t have a great bounty of 2001 movies I love. I&#8217;m not big on Mulholland Drive or Gosford Park or Spirited Away. </p>
<p>And anyway, a great movie year for me is more of a bulk/volume game. There are lots of years where I can find five or six movies I really liked. I mean, really, if a movie year isn&#8217;t yielding that much, it&#8217;s pretty lousy. But the years when I can name 20 or 30, that&#8217;s something a bit more special (and how could I forget Jesse James in 2007? LOVE that one, too). </p>
<p>Double D, I&#8217;m with you on UP as the kind of 2009, and Hurt Locker and Avatar being more good than great, but 2009 also offered: Inglourious Basterds, The Brothers Bloom, A Serious Man, Fantastic Mr. Fox, Adventureland, Where the Wild Things Are, Observe and Report, Star Trek, Funny People, The Girlfriend Experience AND The Informant, Away We Go, Moon&#8230; a volume game!</p>
<p>2003 is the one that sticks out for me as pretty middling. Favorites that year: Kill Bill Volume 1, Once Upon a Time in Mexico (really), Big Fish, American Splendor, Lost in Translation&#8230; some others in &#8217;03 that I like, but dries up pretty quickly after that top five (and that top five isn&#8217;t as strong as some other years).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double D</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/first-blush-review-zero-dark-thirty/#comment-888067</link>
		<dc:creator>Double D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 19:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=162624#comment-888067</guid>
		<description>2007 is the best movie year of the decade, no questions. 2002 and 2003 close behind. 2010 maybe with social network, Inception and True Grit. 

2007 - No Country, Blood, Diving Bell, Michael Clayton, Jesse James, Rataouille, Bourne Ulti, Into the Wild, The Host, No End in Sight. Plus some solid three stars: American Gangster, 310 to Yuma, Atonement, sweeny todd, charlie wilson&#039;s war, Zodiac (though many think that&#039;s a classic). 

2005 likely being the worst. Brokeback is still a good movie, but not nearly as a big deal as people made it at the time. Capote&#039;s fine, good night and good luck is an afternoon school special. Crash sucks. Munich&#039;s a great 90 minute movie stretched 2.5 hours. 

2009 might be worst runner-up. The only ageless movie that year is UP. Hurt Locker and Avatar I think are good, but don&#039;t hold a candle to UP. District 9 also really solid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2007 is the best movie year of the decade, no questions. 2002 and 2003 close behind. 2010 maybe with social network, Inception and True Grit. </p>
<p>2007 &#8211; No Country, Blood, Diving Bell, Michael Clayton, Jesse James, Rataouille, Bourne Ulti, Into the Wild, The Host, No End in Sight. Plus some solid three stars: American Gangster, 310 to Yuma, Atonement, sweeny todd, charlie wilson&#8217;s war, Zodiac (though many think that&#8217;s a classic). </p>
<p>2005 likely being the worst. Brokeback is still a good movie, but not nearly as a big deal as people made it at the time. Capote&#8217;s fine, good night and good luck is an afternoon school special. Crash sucks. Munich&#8217;s a great 90 minute movie stretched 2.5 hours. </p>
<p>2009 might be worst runner-up. The only ageless movie that year is UP. Hurt Locker and Avatar I think are good, but don&#8217;t hold a candle to UP. District 9 also really solid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cadavra</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/first-blush-review-zero-dark-thirty/#comment-888064</link>
		<dc:creator>cadavra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=162624#comment-888064</guid>
		<description>CLOUD ATLAS is another example of Warners&#039; inability to sell anything whose star doesn&#039;t wear a cape or wave a wand. Instead of marketing it as an epic adventure with an all-star cast (including at least four Oscar winners), they sold it as a vegetable movie: &quot;You&#039;ll need to see it several times, &#039;cause you won&#039;t understand it.&quot; Not saying it woulda been a blockbuster, but it shoulda done 50, 60 just on the cast and directors. Instead it&#039;s done about $8 million less than THINK LIKE A MAN&#039;s &lt;i&gt;opening weekend.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CLOUD ATLAS is another example of Warners&#8217; inability to sell anything whose star doesn&#8217;t wear a cape or wave a wand. Instead of marketing it as an epic adventure with an all-star cast (including at least four Oscar winners), they sold it as a vegetable movie: &#8220;You&#8217;ll need to see it several times, &#8217;cause you won&#8217;t understand it.&#8221; Not saying it woulda been a blockbuster, but it shoulda done 50, 60 just on the cast and directors. Instead it&#8217;s done about $8 million less than THINK LIKE A MAN&#8217;s <i>opening weekend.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YancySkancy</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/first-blush-review-zero-dark-thirty/#comment-888062</link>
		<dc:creator>YancySkancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 18:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=162624#comment-888062</guid>
		<description>I dunno, 2001 also had these titles, which ain&#039;t chopped liver, IMO:

A.I.: Artificial Intelligence
Mulholland Drive
Spirited Away
Last Orders
Amelie
Gosford Park
The Others
The Man Who Wasn&#039;t There</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, 2001 also had these titles, which ain&#8217;t chopped liver, IMO:</p>
<p>A.I.: Artificial Intelligence<br />
Mulholland Drive<br />
Spirited Away<br />
Last Orders<br />
Amelie<br />
Gosford Park<br />
The Others<br />
The Man Who Wasn&#8217;t There</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jesse</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/first-blush-review-zero-dark-thirty/#comment-888054</link>
		<dc:creator>jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 17:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=162624#comment-888054</guid>
		<description>I also really like The Fountain! (I wondered if Cloud Atlas might be in trouble box-office wise when I realized one of the demos among my friends where it seemed to do well in terms of wanting to see it was &quot;people who really liked The Fountain&quot;). That is a good &#039;06er, although I admit it might not have made my ten-best list in another year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also really like The Fountain! (I wondered if Cloud Atlas might be in trouble box-office wise when I realized one of the demos among my friends where it seemed to do well in terms of wanting to see it was &#8220;people who really liked The Fountain&#8221;). That is a good &#8217;06er, although I admit it might not have made my ten-best list in another year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanj</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/first-blush-review-zero-dark-thirty/#comment-888050</link>
		<dc:creator>sanj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=162624#comment-888050</guid>
		<description>nobody is talking about playing for keeps 2012 - 

look at all this talent that seems wasted on a family film ...

Gerard Butler, Jessica Biel, Uma Thurman, Dennis Quaid, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Judy Greer....

 Gabriele Muccino  - director has done-  The Pursuit of Happyness - 

chances are most people on here aren&#039;t going to see it and no dp/30&#039;s ...

the end of the year brings action and drama ... everything else seems to not get noticed - family / indie films ...  those have to work way harder to get peoples 
attention... that&#039;s why we need film critics . 


also Jessica Chastain is on the cover of the new UK GQ 
magazine...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nobody is talking about playing for keeps 2012 &#8211; </p>
<p>look at all this talent that seems wasted on a family film &#8230;</p>
<p>Gerard Butler, Jessica Biel, Uma Thurman, Dennis Quaid, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Judy Greer&#8230;.</p>
<p> Gabriele Muccino  &#8211; director has done-  The Pursuit of Happyness &#8211; </p>
<p>chances are most people on here aren&#8217;t going to see it and no dp/30&#8242;s &#8230;</p>
<p>the end of the year brings action and drama &#8230; everything else seems to not get noticed &#8211; family / indie films &#8230;  those have to work way harder to get peoples<br />
attention&#8230; that&#8217;s why we need film critics . </p>
<p>also Jessica Chastain is on the cover of the new UK GQ<br />
magazine&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Cerf</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/first-blush-review-zero-dark-thirty/#comment-888043</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Cerf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=162624#comment-888043</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen Jason Clarke&#039;s &quot;I&#039;m here to break you&quot; speech in the trailer.  I&#039;ve also seen that speech in many other movies, but the guy giving it always had twin lightning bolts on his collar or a red star on his hat.  I have faith that Bigelow and Boal have told a terrific story, and I can&#039;t wait for the political debate that it will provoke once the pundits get to watch it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen Jason Clarke&#8217;s &#8220;I&#8217;m here to break you&#8221; speech in the trailer.  I&#8217;ve also seen that speech in many other movies, but the guy giving it always had twin lightning bolts on his collar or a red star on his hat.  I have faith that Bigelow and Boal have told a terrific story, and I can&#8217;t wait for the political debate that it will provoke once the pundits get to watch it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etguild2</title>
		<link>http://moviecitynews.com/2012/11/first-blush-review-zero-dark-thirty/#comment-888040</link>
		<dc:creator>etguild2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moviecitynews.com/?p=162624#comment-888040</guid>
		<description>I think I have the same problem with last year as you have with 2006...aside from Tree of Life, Hugo, Drive and Another Earth, nothing really reached me. But then again, I have a great love of The Fountain in 2006, which leaves most people totally detached...

Completely agree on 2001.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I have the same problem with last year as you have with 2006&#8230;aside from Tree of Life, Hugo, Drive and Another Earth, nothing really reached me. But then again, I have a great love of The Fountain in 2006, which leaves most people totally detached&#8230;</p>
<p>Completely agree on 2001.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
