MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Review of “Found Footage” Movies: Episode 1 – Project X

Over a couple of months, two studios are releasing two “found footage” movies involving teenagers who get out of control at a party, Chronicle and Project X. (A third one, which mines this theme, but is a somewhat different animal and not pretending to be found footage, 21 Jump Street, is also on the way.) The two films couldn’t really – considering how much they tread on the same themes – be less alike.

Project X isn’t really a found footage movie. It’s a found-a-cache-of early-1990s-music-videos movie. Add a parade 20something hot girls who came to LA to be actresses and may well end up doing porn or Skinemax movies, in and out of show-off underwear to this ad that was shot the Project X‘s first-featuring director…

… and you pretty much have Project X.

To be fair, throw in Oliver Cooper as the sweater vest wearing fast talking kid (think Brett Ratner) who is the closest thing the movie has to an interesting character.

In many ways, I think Project X is from the heart… or somewhere a foot or so below that. But sincerely the idea of great fun for some people. “What if three high schoolers managed to create, pretty much by mistake, a living breathing music video set?” And that’s what they made. For better or for worse.

The film reminded me of all the R-ish teen films they Frankensteined together, but with even more T, a ton more A, and a lack of the narrative thread that those other movies used to fill in the beats between T&A. Ironically, this phenomenon is defined by Kirby Bliss Blanton as The Object Of Presumed Unavailability Even Though The Mutual Crush Is Obvious From Second One. Ms. Blanton is, if not the most teen-boy-boner-inducing female in the film without ever taking her clothes off, an equal bit of lust induction to any of the fake-breasted, how-quickly-can-I-get-your-penis-in-my-mouth-because-I-don’t-really-care-thanks-to-the-hysterically-funny-drugs-I-took women in the film. Project X doesn’t go for the pretty girl with her hair up and glasses on schtick. Ms. Blanton has a face born to Vanity Fair covers.

Of course, the story is Loser Kid, Cool Friend who is not that attractive but could talk the Israelies into giving up Jerusalem, and Fat Kid who is a secret sex machine. A little bit Superbad, a little bit Risky Business, a little bit True Romance… not as good as any of those movies for a minute. The ironic reason for this film’s inherent inferiority is that is trying so very hard. By the third act, not only have the kids lost, as was inevitable from minute one, control… but the filmmakers have completely lost whatever idea of a narrative thread they once had. So the only play to escape the film is, “Bigger.” Doesn’t work.

The thing about Risky Business that kept it grounded was the urge to actually get into college. The thing about Superbad that kept it grounded was the urge to actually get Emma Stone. Project X has no real goal. Yes, it is about coming of age. But none of the characters have a believable or relatable arc, ultimately.

I don’t know how this film will play with its intended audience, which is not me at all. Reflecting on when I would have been the audience for this film, it seems a lot like what I would have wanted… Porky’s on steroids and implants. But are boys still getting turned on by late night cable programming? They all have computers and there is actual porn available all over the place. Does a beautiful ass filling the screen in slow motion require multiple viewings? Alexis Knapp is lovely… and she even claims to have been concerned about not just being another pair of boobs and a warm place for some idiot to put their penis in this film. But alas… that’s all her character is… an inexpensive Megan Fox fill-in who’ll give up the bra on camera. And ironically, that is what keeps her from being more memorable.

Maybe it will be huge. Women should hate every second. But there is plenty of self-loathing out there, so maybe enjoying this film will be a new form of cutting for teen girls. Who knows? And maybe the concentration of T&A and just enough story to reach to identify with will excite a lot of boys. I expect a strong opening, if a certain lack of legs. But rarely is a film released by a studio made less for me.

Coming in Episode II: Why Chronicle may be the most important film released in the first half of this year.

11 Responses to “Review of “Found Footage” Movies: Episode 1 – Project X”

  1. Paul D/Stella says:

    I believe it was the LA Times that said it’s projected to open with around $20 million. Seems like that would be pretty good. It was dirt cheap to make right?

  2. christian says:

    I still recall seeing FRAT HOUSE at SXSW back in 98…who knew Todd Phillip’s dream was to be an honored pledge?

  3. anghus says:

    Oliver Cooper’s character was so grating for the first fifteen minutes. There wasn’t a likable moment for him. He was a walking dick whose shtick got old real fast. Fortunately he gets easier to deal with as the movie goes on.

  4. actionman says:

    Why isn’t Frat House available on DVD? Have always wanted to see it.

  5. Ray Pride says:

    A quick Google search didn’t turn up the reasons, but it may have to do with the doc/not-doc controversy. Hmmm… Someone around here should know.

  6. berg says:

    frat house was not aired when participants sued HBO claiming they had signed releases when they were drunk … also lots of docs stage events they are trying to depict

  7. Ray Pride says:

    Bad releases on a documentary project, tho, that’s close to fatal. Must’ve been here.

  8. Bill S says:

    At the risk of stepping in sanj’s territory, the whole thing is uploaded to Youtube.

    (link to copyright infringing material removed by mcn editor)

  9. Earlhofert says:

    There is a very good chance thatr I am either flat-out wrong or thinking of another film whose title eludes me now (I suspect the latter since I couldn’t find any reference to it) but didn’t Frat House have some other problem involving footage of an apparent sexual assault. If I am thinking of something else, please supply that title so I don’t go mad. . .

  10. berg says:

    If I am thinking of something else, please supply that title

    that would be Raw Deal A Question of Consent

  11. christian says:

    What’s ironic is that every Todd Philips film is celebrated in frat houses across the nation today.

Leave a Reply

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

“When Bay keeps these absurd plot-gears spinning, he’s displaying his skill as a slick, professional entertainer. But then there are the images of motion—I hesitate to say, of things in motion, because it’s not clear how many things there are in the movie, instead of mere digital simulations of things. It doesn’t matter. What matters is that there’s a car chase through London, seen from the level of tires, that could have gone on for an hour, um, tirelessly. What matters is that the defenestrated Cade saves himself by leaping from drone to drone in midair like a frog skipping among lotus pads; that he and Vivian slide along the colossal, polished expanses of sharply tilting age-old fields of metal like luge Olympians. What matters is that, when this heroic duo find themselves thrust out into the void of inner space from a collapsing planet, it has a terrifyingly vast emptiness that Bay doesn’t dare hold for more than an instant lest he become the nightmare-master. What matters is that the enormous thing hurtling toward Earth is composed in a fanatical detail that would repay slow-motion viewing with near-geological patience. Bay has an authentic sense of the gigantic; beside the playful enormity of his Transformerized universe, the ostensibly heroic dimensions of Ridley Scott’s and Christopher Nolan’s massive visions seem like petulant vanities.”
~ Michael Bay Gives Richard Brody A Tingle

How do you see film evolving in this age of Netflix?

I thought the swing would be quicker and more violent. There have been two landmark moments in the history of French film. First in 1946, with the creation of the CNC under the aegis of Malraux. He saved French cinema by establishing the advance on receipts and support fund mechanisms. We’re all children of this political invention. Americans think that the State gives money to French films, but they’re wrong. Through this system, films fund themselves!

The other great turning point came by the hand of Jack Lang in the 1980s, after the creation of Canal+. While television was getting ready to become the nemesis of film, he created the decoder, and a specific broadcasting space between film and television, using new investments for film. That once again saved French film.

These political decisions are important. We’re once again facing big change. If our political masters don’t take control of the situation and new stakeholders like Netflix, Google and Amazon, we’re headed for disaster. We need to create obligations for Internet service providers. They can’t always be against film. They used to allow piracy, but now that they’ve become producers themselves, they’re starting to see things in a different light. This is a moment of transition, a strong political act needs to be put forward. And it can’t just be at national level, it has to happen at European level.

Filmmaker Cédric Klapisch