MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Super Amazing HOT MIley Cyrus Sex Tape Trailer – Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengence

SEO SUCKS!

But this trailer… it actually looks like it could be the rare comic book movie that really gets it… is that possible?

19 Responses to “Super Amazing HOT MIley Cyrus Sex Tape Trailer – Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengence”

  1. anon says:

    wth? i see no sex tape..

  2. JoeLeydon'sPersonalPornStar says:

    Oh David, your superior SEO sucked me in! But I still could care less about comic book movies.

  3. JoeLeydon'sPersonalPornStar says:

    Or, actually, could NOT care less. (Dang that need for real grammar!)

  4. anghus says:

    probably the best marriage between creators and material in the current crop of comic book movies.

    Easily as good as Joe Johnston and Captain America and Nolan/Batman. Ghost Rider is pulp. They got the pulpiest guys in the business. Rock on. My film cock is hard.

  5. sloanish says:

    I really, really hate those guys. And I really hate that I’m in the minority on that.

    As the Cranks come full circle and become looked at as trash art, we all lose.

  6. JKill says:

    I’m mixed on Neveldine/Taylor because I love the two CRANKs but despise GAMER, which is such an ugly, mean-spirited nihilistic celebration…but

    I have to say that trailer worked perfectly on me. The look of the movie and the action is seriously cool. The first GR is defintely towards the bottom quality-wise of the current super hero movies, but Cage is really fun, funny and awesome in it, so I’m glad they’re giving the character another spin. Looks fun.

  7. Chris says:

    Is Nic Cage really gonna pee fire on people in this movie? Cause I may be mistaken, but I’m pretty sure that’s fairly high up on the cinematic must see list. I’m not a fan of Crank, but I dig what they were going for, and this looks like a great match between filmmakers and source material. Bring on some more Cage mega-acting!

  8. 16666 says:

    Am I the only one who liked the first Ghost Rider movie? I’m not saying it was great art, but I think it achieved what it set out to do – entertain. The villain and the girl character were rather blah, but I enjoyed the effects, and Nic Cage and Peter Fonda in the same movie – come on! I was surprised by all the hate and yet it did well enough financially to warrant a sequel.

  9. Pete B. says:

    You’re not the only one to like the 1st, 16666. I enjoyed it as well. The extended (or Special Edition) was even better as it fleshed out (no pun intended) the secondary bad guys.

  10. Martin says:

    I’m not a comic book fum but I like this. Dark, violent, cheesy, and crazy, I like it.

  11. LYT says:

    I liked the first Ghost Rider, but understand why people don’t as it took a gothic, horrific character and made him an over-the-top Nicolas Cage, something I just happen to enjoy.

    Still waiting for a good Bad Lieutenant/Ghost Rider mashup, what with Mendes and Cage starring in both.

    sloanish – I don’t think you’re in the minority disliking N/T, given that none of their movies ever screen for critics. Maybe just the minority here.

  12. storymark says:

    “Gets” what, exactly? And is it really that rare for a comic film to get “it”?

  13. sloaner says:

    LYT – Hearing someone like Patton Oswalt cheer those guys on chills my soul.

  14. LexG says:

    I don’t get the “Miley” thing?

    Where is she?

  15. Foamy Squirrel says:

    You can’t see her? It’s totally obvious to me, and she’s showing her feet too…

  16. LexG says:

    Finally somebody with a sense of humor on here

  17. funny video says:

    Thank you for another wonderful post. The place else could anyone get that type of info in such a perfect approach of writing? I have a presentation next week, and I am on the look for such information.

  18. 女装 says:

    Hi there, I found your website by the use of Google even as searching for a similar subject, your site got here up, it seems to be good. I’ve bookmarked to my favourites|added to bookmarks.

  19. Great points altogether, you simply received a brand new reader. What would you recommend in regards to your put up that you simply made some days ago? Any positive?

Leave a Reply

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

“I was 15 when I first watched Sally Hardesty escape into the back of a pickup truck, covered in blood and cackling like a goddamn witch. All of her friends were dead. She had been kidnapped, tortured and even forced to feed her own blood to her cannibalistic captors’ impossibly shriveled patriarch. Being new to the horror genre, I was sure she was going to die. It had been a few months since I survived a violent sexual assault, where I subsequently ran from my assailant, tripped, fell and fought like hell. I crawled home with bloody knees, makeup-stained cheeks and a new void in both my mind and heart. My sense of safety, my ability to trust others, my willingness to form new relationships and my love of spending time with people I cared about were all taken from me. It wasn’t until I found the original The Texas Chain Saw Massacre that something clicked. It was Sally’s strength, and her resilience. It was watching her survive blows to the head from a hammer. It was watching her break free from her bonds and burst through a glass window. It was watching her get back up after she’d been stabbed. It was watching her crawl into the back of a truck, laughing as it drove away from Leatherface. She was the last one to confront the killer, and live. I remember sitting in front of the TV and thinking, There I am. That’s me.”
~ Lauren Milici On “The Final Girl”

“‘Thriller’ enforced its own reality principle; it was there, part of the every commute, a serenade to every errand, a referent to every purchase, a fact of every life. You didn’t have to like it, you only had to acknowledge it. By July 6, 1984, when the Jacksons played the first show of their ‘Victory’ tour, in Kansas City, Missouri, Jacksonism had produced a system of commodification so complete that whatever and whoever was admitted to it instantly became a new commodity. People were no longer comsuming commodities as such things are conventionally understood (records, videos, posters, books, magazines, key rings, earrings necklaces pins buttons wigs voice-altering devices Pepsis t-shirts underwear hats scarves gloves jackets – and why were there no jeans called Bille Jeans?); they were consuming their own gestures of consumption. That is, they were consuming not a Tayloristic Michael Jackson, or any licensed facsimile, but themselves. Riding a Mobius strip of pure capitalism, that was the transubstantiation.”
~ Greil Marcus On Michael Jackson