MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Posted Friday, August 19th, 2011 - 19 Comments »

Super Amazing HOT MIley Cyrus Sex Tape Trailer – Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengence

SEO SUCKS!

But this trailer… it actually looks like it could be the rare comic book movie that really gets it… is that possible?

19 Comments »

19 Responses to “Super Amazing HOT MIley Cyrus Sex Tape Trailer – Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengence”

  1. anon says:
    August 19, 2011 at 7:18 pm

    wth? i see no sex tape..

  2. JoeLeydon'sPersonalPornStar says:
    August 19, 2011 at 7:23 pm

    Oh David, your superior SEO sucked me in! But I still could care less about comic book movies.

  3. JoeLeydon'sPersonalPornStar says:
    August 19, 2011 at 7:25 pm

    Or, actually, could NOT care less. (Dang that need for real grammar!)

  4. anghus says:
    August 19, 2011 at 7:27 pm

    probably the best marriage between creators and material in the current crop of comic book movies.

    Easily as good as Joe Johnston and Captain America and Nolan/Batman. Ghost Rider is pulp. They got the pulpiest guys in the business. Rock on. My film cock is hard.

  5. sloanish says:
    August 19, 2011 at 7:41 pm

    I really, really hate those guys. And I really hate that I’m in the minority on that.

    As the Cranks come full circle and become looked at as trash art, we all lose.

  6. JKill says:
    August 19, 2011 at 8:23 pm

    I’m mixed on Neveldine/Taylor because I love the two CRANKs but despise GAMER, which is such an ugly, mean-spirited nihilistic celebration…but

    I have to say that trailer worked perfectly on me. The look of the movie and the action is seriously cool. The first GR is defintely towards the bottom quality-wise of the current super hero movies, but Cage is really fun, funny and awesome in it, so I’m glad they’re giving the character another spin. Looks fun.

  7. Chris says:
    August 20, 2011 at 11:20 am

    Is Nic Cage really gonna pee fire on people in this movie? Cause I may be mistaken, but I’m pretty sure that’s fairly high up on the cinematic must see list. I’m not a fan of Crank, but I dig what they were going for, and this looks like a great match between filmmakers and source material. Bring on some more Cage mega-acting!

  8. 16666 says:
    August 20, 2011 at 3:24 pm

    Am I the only one who liked the first Ghost Rider movie? I’m not saying it was great art, but I think it achieved what it set out to do – entertain. The villain and the girl character were rather blah, but I enjoyed the effects, and Nic Cage and Peter Fonda in the same movie – come on! I was surprised by all the hate and yet it did well enough financially to warrant a sequel.

  9. Pete B. says:
    August 20, 2011 at 5:12 pm

    You’re not the only one to like the 1st, 16666. I enjoyed it as well. The extended (or Special Edition) was even better as it fleshed out (no pun intended) the secondary bad guys.

  10. Martin says:
    August 20, 2011 at 5:43 pm

    I’m not a comic book fum but I like this. Dark, violent, cheesy, and crazy, I like it.

  11. LYT says:
    August 20, 2011 at 7:14 pm

    I liked the first Ghost Rider, but understand why people don’t as it took a gothic, horrific character and made him an over-the-top Nicolas Cage, something I just happen to enjoy.

    Still waiting for a good Bad Lieutenant/Ghost Rider mashup, what with Mendes and Cage starring in both.

    sloanish – I don’t think you’re in the minority disliking N/T, given that none of their movies ever screen for critics. Maybe just the minority here.

  12. storymark says:
    August 20, 2011 at 9:25 pm

    “Gets” what, exactly? And is it really that rare for a comic film to get “it”?

  13. sloaner says:
    August 21, 2011 at 12:01 am

    LYT – Hearing someone like Patton Oswalt cheer those guys on chills my soul.

  14. LexG says:
    August 21, 2011 at 12:12 am

    I don’t get the “Miley” thing?

    Where is she?

  15. Foamy Squirrel says:
    August 21, 2011 at 3:13 am

    You can’t see her? It’s totally obvious to me, and she’s showing her feet too…

  16. LexG says:
    August 21, 2011 at 3:18 am

    Finally somebody with a sense of humor on here

  17. funny video says:
    January 5, 2012 at 11:31 am

    Thank you for another wonderful post. The place else could anyone get that type of info in such a perfect approach of writing? I have a presentation next week, and I am on the look for such information.

  18. 女装 says:
    January 5, 2012 at 5:58 pm

    Hi there, I found your website by the use of Google even as searching for a similar subject, your site got here up, it seems to be good. I’ve bookmarked to my favourites|added to bookmarks.

  19. Get free stuff and make easy money says:
    January 7, 2012 at 3:30 am

    Great points altogether, you simply received a brand new reader. What would you recommend in regards to your put up that you simply made some days ago? Any positive?

Leave a Reply

The Hot Blog

Comments Most Recent Archives

lazarus on: Don Draper: Critic

Jermsguy on: Review: Man of Steel (spoilers)

leahnz on: Don Draper: Critic

Keil S. on: Don Draper: Critic

Joe Leydon on: Don Draper: Critic

Keil S. on: Don Draper: Critic

christian on: Don Draper: Critic

movieman on: Don Draper: Critic

movieman on: Don Draper: Critic

palmtree on: Don Draper: Critic

Quote Unquotesee all »

“I don’t really think, Sean, that you need to know about my various sexual liaisons. Or that anyone else needs to. I did write about them. I filled a hundred pages of Moleskine notebooks with my one-night stands, my affairs. But I decided they didn’t belong in a professional memoir. First of all, these are real people we’re talking about. Many of them were enjoyable. Some were abject failures. My wife said to me when she read the pages, ‘Of what purpose is this in a memoir? Of what purpose is this other than to titillate?’ The point is, I never see them. It’s because I have nothing in common with them, frankly. And probably didn’t at the time. I could not provide a sensible reason why I married these women. The thing is, in the case of my marriages, it takes two people to fuck up a marriage. It wasn’t simply the fault of these women that I lost interest in them and realised they were insignificant relationships. Which is how I look at them right now–as being insignificant. I see them as blips.”
~ William Friedkin On Cutting Interviewers Off At The Sass

“I have to imagine from Mr. Spielberg’s point of view, the paradigm shift in the 1970s was just the new “normal,” a “halcyon era” from which we are straying in the 21st century–because theatrical exhibition is tenuous (as it has been since the 1940s), the home video market has dried up and people are watching pirated movies on their phone. Spielberg’s coming-of-age era was for him the halcyon period that the 21st century “implosion” will cause to go “crashing into the ground.” But he is wrong. The market for movies is actually diverse and highly segmented–although from the top-down movie industry vantage point and media punditry you would not think this to be true.  Would we really mourn for Mr. Spielberg or ourselves if Lincoln would have been made for cable or had played on public television?  Is it bad for humanity that cable television is creating wonderful, resonant stories in long-form series that people want to watch at home on TV (or streamed onto their computer)? I don’t think so, but it is a paradigm shift and it might affect people’s theatrical moviegoing habits. Televisions in people’s homes have had that effect for seven decades–it is not a new phenomenon. As Art House cinema impresarios we need to focus on what WE can do at our theaters and in our communities. It is not productive for us to fret over what pundits say or about what well-meaning filmmakers like the Stevens–Spielberg and Soderbergh–say. We should fret about what we can do in our communities. What we can do to support filmmakers.”
~ From A Response By Russ Collins, CEO, Michigan Theater – Ann Arbor And Director, Art House Convergence, To Mr. Spielberg