MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Super Amazing HOT MIley Cyrus Sex Tape Trailer – Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengence

SEO SUCKS!

But this trailer… it actually looks like it could be the rare comic book movie that really gets it… is that possible?

19 Responses to “Super Amazing HOT MIley Cyrus Sex Tape Trailer – Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengence”

  1. anon says:

    wth? i see no sex tape..

  2. JoeLeydon'sPersonalPornStar says:

    Oh David, your superior SEO sucked me in! But I still could care less about comic book movies.

  3. JoeLeydon'sPersonalPornStar says:

    Or, actually, could NOT care less. (Dang that need for real grammar!)

  4. anghus says:

    probably the best marriage between creators and material in the current crop of comic book movies.

    Easily as good as Joe Johnston and Captain America and Nolan/Batman. Ghost Rider is pulp. They got the pulpiest guys in the business. Rock on. My film cock is hard.

  5. sloanish says:

    I really, really hate those guys. And I really hate that I’m in the minority on that.

    As the Cranks come full circle and become looked at as trash art, we all lose.

  6. JKill says:

    I’m mixed on Neveldine/Taylor because I love the two CRANKs but despise GAMER, which is such an ugly, mean-spirited nihilistic celebration…but

    I have to say that trailer worked perfectly on me. The look of the movie and the action is seriously cool. The first GR is defintely towards the bottom quality-wise of the current super hero movies, but Cage is really fun, funny and awesome in it, so I’m glad they’re giving the character another spin. Looks fun.

  7. Chris says:

    Is Nic Cage really gonna pee fire on people in this movie? Cause I may be mistaken, but I’m pretty sure that’s fairly high up on the cinematic must see list. I’m not a fan of Crank, but I dig what they were going for, and this looks like a great match between filmmakers and source material. Bring on some more Cage mega-acting!

  8. 16666 says:

    Am I the only one who liked the first Ghost Rider movie? I’m not saying it was great art, but I think it achieved what it set out to do – entertain. The villain and the girl character were rather blah, but I enjoyed the effects, and Nic Cage and Peter Fonda in the same movie – come on! I was surprised by all the hate and yet it did well enough financially to warrant a sequel.

  9. Pete B. says:

    You’re not the only one to like the 1st, 16666. I enjoyed it as well. The extended (or Special Edition) was even better as it fleshed out (no pun intended) the secondary bad guys.

  10. Martin says:

    I’m not a comic book fum but I like this. Dark, violent, cheesy, and crazy, I like it.

  11. LYT says:

    I liked the first Ghost Rider, but understand why people don’t as it took a gothic, horrific character and made him an over-the-top Nicolas Cage, something I just happen to enjoy.

    Still waiting for a good Bad Lieutenant/Ghost Rider mashup, what with Mendes and Cage starring in both.

    sloanish – I don’t think you’re in the minority disliking N/T, given that none of their movies ever screen for critics. Maybe just the minority here.

  12. storymark says:

    “Gets” what, exactly? And is it really that rare for a comic film to get “it”?

  13. sloaner says:

    LYT – Hearing someone like Patton Oswalt cheer those guys on chills my soul.

  14. LexG says:

    I don’t get the “Miley” thing?

    Where is she?

  15. Foamy Squirrel says:

    You can’t see her? It’s totally obvious to me, and she’s showing her feet too…

  16. LexG says:

    Finally somebody with a sense of humor on here

  17. funny video says:

    Thank you for another wonderful post. The place else could anyone get that type of info in such a perfect approach of writing? I have a presentation next week, and I am on the look for such information.

  18. 女装 says:

    Hi there, I found your website by the use of Google even as searching for a similar subject, your site got here up, it seems to be good. I’ve bookmarked to my favourites|added to bookmarks.

  19. Great points altogether, you simply received a brand new reader. What would you recommend in regards to your put up that you simply made some days ago? Any positive?

Leave a Reply

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

“The worst thing that we have in today’s movie culture is Rotten Tomatoes. It’s the destruction of our business. I have such respect and admiration for film criticism. When I was growing up film criticism was a real art. And there was intellect that went into that. And you would read Pauline’s Kael’s reviews, or some others, and that doesn’t exist anymore. Now it’s about a number. A compounded number of how many positives vs. negatives. Now it’s about, ‘What’s your Rotten Tomatoes score?’ And that’s sad, because the Rotten Tomatoes score was so low on Batman v Superman I think it put a cloud over a movie that was incredibly successful. People don’t realize what goes into making a movie like that. It’s mind-blowing. It’s just insane, it’s hurting the business, it’s getting people to not see a movie. In Middle America it’s, ‘Oh, it’s a low Rotten Tomatoes score so I’m not going to go see it because it must suck.’ But that number is an aggregate and one that nobody can figure out exactly what it means, and it’s not always correct. I’ve seen some great movies with really abysmal Rotten Tomatoes scores. What’s sad is film criticism has disappeared. It’s really sad.”
~ Brett Ratner Has A Sad

“The loss of a local newspaper critic is a real loss. People who know the local audience and know the local cultural scene are very important resources. You can’t just substitute the stuff that comes in from nowhere through syndication or the wire. I think at the same time, some of the newer outlets have really beefed up and improved their coverage and made room for criticism. The real problem is in the more specialized art forms — fine arts, classical music, dance and jazz, say. There is a real slowing of critical voices, partly because those art forms have smaller audiences. Newspapers and magazines can say that doesn’t get enough traffic, so we don’t have room for that. To me, that’s especially worrisome. This is the opposite of what newspapers are supposed to do, which is not to try to figure out what people are already interested in and recite that back to them, but to hopefully guide them to something that they should be interested in, connecting potential audiences with more interesting work.

“Then again, not everyone needs a critic. People have been going to movies for more than 100 years now, and probably the vast majority of those people have not read movie reviews or cared what critics thought. But there has always been an important subset that wants to know more, that wants to think about what they’ve seen and what they’re going to see, and wants someone to think along with. I think critics are important, not just as dispensers of consumer advice — though that’s certainly part of it, too — but as trusted voices and companions for people to argue with in your head when you’re going to movies or afterwards.”
~ A. O. Scott