MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland

Disney & Warners Lead The Way To Digital Future

While everyone was busy slapping Netflix on the back, two studios started making plans for a world in which Netflix makes for a lovely fourth tier window.

In-House Subscription Access
Single Unit Sell-Thru (digital or on disc)
Other Distribution Outlets, including Netflix, Hulu, Amazon, etc

Today’s discussion/announcements at All Thing Digital’s D9 Conference by Bob Iger pretty much clarified where this is all heading, with obvious room for variations along the road.

There will be a that is the content hub for all things Disney. “A subscription service, advertising, pay-per-view, and even micropayment.”

As Warners has said before, Iger is happy to have Netflix out there paying for content. Why not? In this evolution, the cost and value of content is rising and the next iteration is splitting up rights at even higher prices so brands can feed expectations.

For instance, Disney TV and Netflix did a deal to allow Netflix to stream a bunch of adult and family television content. Some of those shows air on Hulu for those first two weeks, but don’t stream to Hulu Plus (to be seen on your TV or iPad in HD quality). Some of them are on Hulu Plus. Some have entire seasons on Hule and Hulu Plus, while some no longer air on Hulu at all.

Just when things had gotten a bit staid and easy to predict, every film is a new sales opportunity and creative packaging (to content buyers, not consumers) will be a seriously valued commodity. Don’t be surprised if we see some agents move to studios so the studios can take advantage of their creative packaging skills.

There is no DVD replacement… there is a world of DVD replacements… though they probably won’t add up to enough to keep the more radical future of subscription-based access.

And in a world of smaller revenue streams, the relatively stable and high-cost-per-viewing theatrical business will become more and more important.

One Response to “Disney & Warners Lead The Way To Digital Future”

  1. Jason says:

    Maybe studios can get this to work and this is where post-theatrical (or day-and-date releases) are headed. But I for one will not have multiple subscriptions just to rent/stream movies. I would think the general public would too. Unless there are some real bargains/deals out there, in many cases (and history supports this), consumers’ decisions are based on cost and convenience. Having multiple subscriptions is not convenient and probably would be too expensive. This is why Netflix and Redbox have become so popular. But hey, I’m just one person – good luck Disney.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

“I had this friend who was my roommate for a while. She seemed really normal in every way except that she wouldn’t buy shampoo. She would only use my shampoo. And after a year it’s like, “When are you going to buy your own shampoo?” It was her way of digging in her heels. It was a certain sense of entitlement, or a certain anger. It was so interesting to me why she wouldn’t buy her own fucking shampoo. It was like,“I’m gonna use yours.” It was coming from a place of “You have more money than me, I just know it”—whether I did or I didn’t. Or maybe she felt, “You have a better life than me,” or “You have a better room than me in the apartment.” It was hostile. And she was a really close friend! There was never any other shampoo and I knew she was washing her hair. And clearly I have a thing about shampoo, as we see in ‘Friends with Money.’ I had some nice shampoo. So I found that psychologically so interesting how a person can function normally in every way and yet have this aberrance—it’s like a skip in the record. It was a sense of entitlement, I think. I put that in Olivia’s character, too, with her stealing someone’s face cream.”
Nicole Holofcener

“When books become a thing, they can no longer be fine.

“Literary people get mad at Knausgård the same way they get mad at Jonathan Franzen, a writer who, if I’m being honest, might be fine. I’m rarely honest about Jonathan Franzen. He’s an extremely annoying manI have only read bits and pieces of his novels, and while I’ve stopped reading many novels even though they were pretty good or great, I have always stopped reading Jonathan Franzen’s novels because I thought they were aggressively boring and dumb and smug. But why do I think this? I didn’t read him when he was a new interesting writer who wrote a couple of weird books and then hit it big with ‘The Corrections,’ a moment in which I might have picked him up with curiosity and read with an open mind; I only noticed him once, after David Foster Wallace had died, he became the heir apparent for the Great American Novelist position, once he had had that thing with Oprah and started giving interviews in which he said all manner of dumb shit; I only noticed him well after I had been told he was An Important Writer.

“So I can’t and shouldn’t pretend that I am unmoved by the lazily-satisfied gentle arrogance he projects or when he is given license to project it by the has-the-whole-world-gone-crazy development of him being constantly crowned and re-crowned as Is He The Great American Writer. What I really object to is this, and if there’s anything to his writing beyond it, I can’t see it and can’t be bothered. Others read him and tell me he’s actually a good writer—people whose critical instincts I have learned to respect—so I feel sure that he’s probably a perfectly fine, that his books are fine, and that probably even his stupid goddamned bird essays are probably also fine.

“But it’s too late. He has become a thing; he can’t be fine.”
~ Aaron Bady