Archive for February, 2011

Oscar Show Ratings: Fair To Meh

Monday, February 28th, 2011

Oscar Show Ratings: Fair To Meh

Denton Admits Redesign Made A Wreck Of Gawker

Monday, February 28th, 2011

Denton Admits Redesign Made A Wreck Of Gawker

Salon Sale Talks Collapse

Monday, February 28th, 2011

Salon Sale Talks Collapse

Melissa Leo Had A F’ing Premonition

Monday, February 28th, 2011

Melissa Leo Had A F’ing Premonition

Charlie Sheen in FERRIS BUELLER: At The Station For Drugs

Monday, February 28th, 2011

WILMINGTON ON MOVIES: On the Bowery

Monday, February 28th, 2011

On the Bowery (Four Stars)
U.S.: Lionel Rogosin, 1956

On the Bowery is Lionel Rogosin’s legendary 1956 documentary about men who drink, set in the derelict bars, flophouses and missions of New York City‘s Bowery in the ’50s. Now beautifully restored in 35 mm by Milestone Films, this black and white film chronicle of a short season in hell below the 3rd Avenue El, is an almost unbearably truthful film. It remains a shattering experience, one of the most haunting and moving “slice of life“ movies of the entire post-war period.

Rogosin, who lived near the Bowery on Perry Street, researched the film for several years, then shot a partly scripted, partly improvised dramatic story, centering on two actual Bowery denizens, Ray Salyer and Gorman Hendricks, who play themselves. Ray and Gorman were both hard-core alcoholics, and Rogosin and his brilliant cinematographer and co-writer Richard Bagley, followed them around into the local bars (The Roundhouse, The Confidence Bar and Grill), shooting them as they drank the cheap wine that was their booze of choice, and as they socialized with the other drunks, until the Bowery pair finally staggered off into the night, to find a cheap hotel, or collapse on the sidewalks in drunken sleep.

It is no exaggeration to say that Ray and Gorman, two amateurs with no film experience at all, give two of the most extraordinary and moving performances in the history of the American cinema. These two non-professional actors let us into their lives and give themselves over to Rogosin’s film and its story with a courage, an openness — and a seemingly unerring sense of the camera and their relation to it — that few professional actors could have mustered.

Ray is a handsome rail worker, with a preoccupied look, who reminds you a little of Gary Cooper or Joel McCrea. He arrives in the Bowery, after a season of railroad work, with a suitcase of clothes, savings and belongings. Immediately, he hits the bars where he meets Gorman. Gorman is a fat, gabby, dissolute old man with shifty eyes and an easy line of bull and patter who reminds you a bit of Charley Grapewin, the great movie character actor of John Ford‘s The Grapes of Wrath and Tobacco Road. He was, he claims, both a doctor (a surgeon) and a newspaperman. Now, he hangs around the bars with the generous Ray, drinking with him and letting Ray buy, until Ray leaves and falls drunk onto the sidewalk outisde. Then Gorman steals Ray‘s suitcase and uses it to rent a flophouse room.

The two later meet again — the film Ray is seemingly unaware that Gorman is the thief, which seems proof that the actors knew more than their characters did — and Gorman tries to coax him into more drinking. Ray, chastened at the loss of all the railroad money he saved, refuses that convivial offer and tries to rehabilitate himself. He gets some day work, stops drinking for a few days, goes to the local mission and tries to submit to the mission‘s routines and disciplines.

SPOILER ALERT

He can’t. He can’t escape the booze, which he admits is his life. Neither can Gorman, who, unlike Ray, won’t even try to work. Finally, Gorman — in an outburst of “charity” — gives Ray a few of the bills he got by stealing Ray’s suitcase and pawning it, while inventing a lie about where they came from.

END OF SPOILER

The ending of On the Bowery is full of irony, despair and surprising humanity. So was the real-life conclusion of Rogosin‘s project. Ray, who created a sensation among the era’s film critics when On the Bowery was released (winning a Grand Prize at the Venice Film Festival), was offered a Hollywood contract. Instead he left New York and disappeared into parts unknown. Gorman, who had severe cirrhosis of the liver, was told by a doctor that, if he went on one more binge, he would die. Admonished by Rogosin to stop for the good of the picture, Gorman did. Then, when the shooting was finished, the old man went on another binge and died. The film is dedicated to him.

Some other superb collaborators worked with Rogosin and Bagley on On the Bowery, including the film’s jazz composer, Charles Mills, and one of the best editors of that period, Carl Lerner. (Lerner also cut 12 Angry Men) But Bagley had a sad fate. The co-writer-cinematographer, whose black and white camerawork here is a revelation of clarity, rich atmosphere and unforced feeling, was an alcoholic as well, and he also died, within several years.

So, as we watch this great, tough, clear-eyed, compassionate film, we see these two men, Gorman and Ray, old and younger, in the grip of an addiction that will kill or destroy them, submitting to it (with a slight struggle, in Ray’s case, unashamedly in Gorman’s) even though they know what will probably happen to them.

That same sense of self-destruction, and that same willingness to suffer it, is probably true for almost all the rest of men we see in the bars, indeed, almost all the people in the film except the mission workers, the recovered alcoholics, or the passersby whom the drunks bum for quarters). On the Bowery seems at first to be a typical low-life study, But the reality with which Ray and Gorman, and the others, endow their characters and scenes, gives the film real power. Some of the best of it recalls the doss house scenes in Jean Renoir‘s 1936 French film adaptation of Maxim Gorky’s The Lower Depths. Some of it recalls the Italian neo-realist film classics, which so obviously inspired Rogosin.

This is not a cinema verite film, although parts of it are obviously improvised. It obviously has a script, a plot, a dramatic arc, and characters. Ray and Gorman know, as actors, where the scenes are going, and how to get them there.

But neither is Rogosin’s movie a conventional narrative film, conventionally organized. On the Bowery has an incredible feeling of reality, of eavesdropping on real life, but it also has the dramatic structure, rhythms and catharsis of a masterful play, which, in a way, it is.

It’s antecedents are not so much movies like Billy Wilder’s The Lost Weekend, but the great documentaries of Robert Flaherty (Man of Aran), who also used scripted storylines and real people.  And it springs also from the vein of those post war Italian neo-realist street films by De Sica and Rossellini, films that also mixed drama and “reality,” and also used non-professionals in their casts.

Its descendants include those great modern realistic films, from John Cassavetes’ powerful, unvarnished, sometimes boozy dramas, to the British realist working class films of Ken Loach and Mike Leigh, all of which employ improvised rehearsals or on-camera improvisation to help tell fictional stories. Cassavetes, a particular admirer, once called Rogosin “the greatest documentary filmmaker who ever lived.”

Sadly, Rogosin died in 2000, in his 70s, after making only relatively a few more films, including the scathing 1966 anti-Apartheid documentary Come Back, Africa. His son Michael Rogosin — who directed The Perfect Team, the “making-of” featurette that plays with the current re-release of On the Bowery — is, with the help of Milestone, now working on the restoration and distribution of all of his father’s filmed legacy. It’s a beautiful, much-needed tribute. Like Lionel Rogosin’s masterpiece – with its stunning views of life on the street, of men on the Bowery, and of (temporary) survival in Hell — that legacy is seemingly small, actually huge. (Chicago Gene Siskel Center.)

DP/30 @ Sundance – If A Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front, director Marshall Curry

Monday, February 28th, 2011

Oscar Winning DP/30s

Monday, February 28th, 2011

ACTOR
Colin Firth, The King’s Speech

ACTRESS
Natalie Portman, Black Swan

SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Melissa Leo, The Fighter

DIRECTOR
Tom Hooper, The King’s Speech

SCREENWRITER
Aaron Sorkin, The Social Network

CINEMATOGRAPHER
Wally Pfister, Inception

EDITOR
Angus Wall & Kirk Baxter, The Social Network

ANIMATED FEATURE
Lee Unkrich, Toy Story 3

DOCUMENTARIES
Inside Job – director Charles Ferguson

FOREIGN LANGUAGE
In a Better World, Denmark – writer/director Susanne Bier

DP/30: With The Oscar Winners

Monday, February 28th, 2011

ACTOR
Colin Firth, The King’s Speech

ACTRESS
Natalie Portman, Black Swan

SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Melissa Leo, The Fighter

DIRECTOR
Tom Hooper, The King’s Speech

SCREENWRITER
Aaron Sorkin, The Social Network

CINEMATOGRAPHER
Wally Pfister, Inception

EDITOR
Angus Wall & Kirk Baxter, The Social Network

ANIMATED FEATURE
Lee Unkrich, Toy Story 3

DOCUMENTARIES
Inside Job – director Charles Ferguson

FOREIGN LANGUAGE
In a Better World, Denmark – writer/director Susanne Bier

“A World With Fewer Borders”

Monday, February 28th, 2011

“A World With Fewer Borders”

A Day On B’way With Tom Stoppard

Monday, February 28th, 2011

A Day On B’way With Tom Stoppard

Oscar Boxing Day Thoughts

Monday, February 28th, 2011

I was just chatting with my good friend Eric D. Snider about post-Oscar day, which he glibly dubbed “Oscar Boxing Day.” And I like that term, so I’m using it here. Because even though Boxing Day proper has nothing to do with punching an opponent while wearing oversized mitts, the very name does connote a sense of the losers feeling like they’ve had the wind socked out of them.
(more…)

Oscar Weekend Long-Reads

Monday, February 28th, 2011

Ronnie Chasen: Oscar’s Missing Guest

John Sloss Sees A Youth Movement In Academy vid

Kids Are All Right Only One Of 10 Best Pic Nominees Shot Entirely In Los Angeles

Lisa Cholodenko Resists Label Of Lesbian “It-Couple”

Partying With Mr. Brainwash

Is Black Swan ”Ballet-ploitation,” Asks Toni Bentley

Cieply Churns A Thumbsucker On New Yorkers Who Head West At Oscar Time And Visits With Peter Guber, Who Has Stories To Sell

Timothy Egan On Class Issues In Social Network And King’s Speech

Costume Design Tougher In Contemporary Films

H’wd Memoir “Haywire” Gets A Second Life After Dennis Hopper’s Passing

An Optimistic Piece On The Possibility Of Smaller Films Making It

Christopher Kelly On The Stealth Sundance Success Of Jeff Nichols’ Take Shelter

Gore Verbinski, At Home On The Rango

Barnes Wonders If Nolfi Knows His Dick (Philip K., That Is)

Filmmaker Jeff Lipsky Returns To His “Lucky” Movie Theater

Josh Radnor’s Latter-Day Lower East Side In Happythankyoumoreplease

Renee Zellweger Thinks It’s Time For A Trim Bridget Jones

Forbes Blogger Thinks There Might Be A Surfeit Of Sequels

Is Loren Stein A Worthy Editor And Partygoer To Bear The Late George Plimpton’s Martini Glass As Paris Review Editor?

Journo Endures Vanity Fair Oscar Party

Monday, February 28th, 2011

Journo Endures Vanity Fair Oscar Party

iW Remembers Gary Winick

Monday, February 28th, 2011

iW Remembers Gary Winick

Mr. Hooper Did Not Thank Mr. Weinstein? We Are Not Amused

Monday, February 28th, 2011

Mr. Hooper Did Not Thank Mr. Weinstein? We Are Not Amused

Taking Madonna To The Amadeus Party

Monday, February 28th, 2011

Taking Madonna To The Amadeus Party

“What’s the missing link between Tron, The Legend of Hell House and a big blue alien?”

Monday, February 28th, 2011

“What’s the missing link between Tron, The Legend of Hell House and a big blue alien?”

Variety Sets Press Release Blog Outside Of Paywall

Monday, February 28th, 2011

Variety Sets Press Release Blog Outside Of Paywall

Some Post-Oscar Tidbits

Monday, February 28th, 2011

My favorite and not-favorite Oscar moments, which may be updated as I think of more of them …

Hailee “pretty in pink” Steinfeld, looking sweetly age-appropriate. But it cracks me up to have dolled-up television entertainment reporters being all, “Oh, it’s so NICE and REFRESHING to see (insert every young actress ever nominated for Supporting here) dressed so appropriately for her age. She just looks like a little girl playing princess, which is as it should be.” Well, yes, okay, it is. And Ms. Steinfeld will have another moment, if she wants it.

Jeff Bridges grabbing the mic on the red carpet and interviewing his entire family about their Oscar experience. The Dude abides. Always.

The whole set-up-with-zero-payout about the trifecta of art, cinematography and picture felt so completely random. WTF was that about? I mean, if I was placing a bunch of really obscure bets with a bookie, maybe, but who else cares?

Listening to the post-show blither-blather about fashion hits and misses. But okay, since I was listening anyhow … if I was going to have an opinion on the fashions, it would be that I hated Melissa Leo’s dress. She looked so lovely otherwise, but I would have loved to have seen her in something sleek in black or silver tonight. Loved Jennifer Lawrence’s simple, sexy red. Loved Hathaway’s Valentino. Loved the black lace on Russell Brand’s mom.

Hated the opening thing with the mom/grandma. Ugh. File under bad idea.

Definitely a mom theme going on, with resplendently pregnant Portman, radiant postpartum Penelope, and Celene Dion, who I guess just had twins. Glad that Hailee Steinfeld was not in maternity wear. She seems like a nice, level-headed kid. I hope she doesn’t Lohan.

Liked Hathaway and Franco overall. Actually, dang … I really like Hathaway a lot. Franco seemed stoned the whole time — what was with the squinting? Steve Martin with thinning hair makes me feel old. Mila Kunis looks great in lavender.

The mash-up of the Harry Potter song was awesome.

Melissa Leo having a vocabulary malfunction is exactly why we love her. More, please.

WTF was up with the Oscar guy commentator going off about King’s Speech being a great feel-good movie that people love and it makes them feel all happy-happy, and then specifically referencing Blue Valentine as “ugh, depressing, who wants to see that?” What a load of BS. I saw The King’s Speech last night finally, and I liked it, for what it is. It’s feel good, it has populist appeal, it’s the kid who’s popular for being a nice guy with a winning personality.

Blue Valentine is dark and daring and gritty, Ryan Gosling is soul-felt and terrific and Michelle Williams even better (she may just be the actress of her generation when all’s said and done), even the end credits sequence is relevant and artful.

… oh, and the Charlie Sheen joke was funny, I get it. But not. It’s sad to see someone nose-diving in the wake of addiction.