MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Review – Never Let Me Go

Sometimes an artist’s instrument is so sharp that many of the viewers will not feel the incision, either on the surface nor in its unusual depth. Such is what you’ll find in Mark Romanek’s new film, Never Let Me Go.

The story sounds like genre, but it is uninterested in the elements that drive genre. It is not only a deconstruction; it seeks to find the true universality in what, in the past, has been a very specific, gimmicky idea. And it succeeds without reserve.

The premise, which unveils itself in the first act, is that humanity has, at least from the perspective of the film, decided that farming cloned humans for replacement parts is a good idea. But this is not the stuff of Logan’s Run and The Island. It is not about escaping an inhumane fate by running away from it with a trail of gunfire and crashed future vehicles. It’s much more in the spiritual space, unexpectedly, of Blade Runner, but set in the English countryside, with Carey Mulligan’s Kathy as our gun-less, more self-aware Deckard. She and all the young characters wrestle with what they know and choose not to know.

Romanek and screenwriter Alex Garland, working with the Kazuo Ishiguro novel, have built the story so that it’s not about the reveal. There are no Gotcha moments. What gets you is the lack of shock.

In this insular world, there are few outsiders. The audience becomes one. As we accept the premise, without rage, we accept our complacency in so many of the world’s horrors. The allusions to the Jewish Holocaust are clearly there, although subtle. It’s not gas chambers you are watching, but a world that looks the other way as the trains roll by and the smoke fills the air at dusk. Why wasn’t there more screaming and fighting and rage on display from inside of those trains as rolled along in the late ‘30s and early ‘40s? Of course, we cannot judge these victims by the simple poles of right and wrong. We can’t really judge these people at all. As they see our blank faces trying to look away as they pass, it is we who should be judged by them, though they have no sense of this. They survive by their nature, adjusting without question to a world in which they do not believe they control their fates… or should.

At the center of this story are Kathy, Ruth & Tommy. The Thinker, The Girl Id, and the Simple Boy. They are, on some level, clichés wandering through this story. But the size of the ideas make them more than that. They are helpers – carers, even – to the audiences, allowing us into their world without forcing the film to verbalize the experience for us. They just Are. It is because we know them that we don’t have to intellectualize them.

The story, on the surface, is also quite simple. Things, until late in the film, go pretty much according to the plan their world has for them. Personal acts don’t change much of anything.

But as the movie continues down the tracks, we, as an audience, have to live with what we know… what seems inevitable… unstoppable. And that is the mighty hammer of this film. These children, whether 8 or 28, are us… they are strangers… they are homeless people we pass on the streets of cities… they are victims of warring societies held less important than the politics of the men who are safe behind castle walls… they are everyone we have discarded… everyone who were probably could have helped, but rationalized were too far down the track to be saved, so why bother?

But their souls… at the central, mostly unspoken heart of the film… are undeniable, whether smart, simple, vain, or childish. How can we see them as Other, even if they allow us to do so? And as such, their story brings the purity of our souls into doubt.

The production is elegant. The performances are virtually perfect across the board. But make no mistake. This is Carey Mulligan’s movie and she is a near-lock to garner her second Oscar nominations in two years – really two years as a movie actress – for her work.

Keira Knightley, who in some ways has the most thankless role, seems to improve as her choices become clearer and clearer as the film warms in memory. Clearly, this was the plan all along. And Andrew Garfield, who clearly is a perfect match for the comic book Peter Parker, is flawless as the embodiment of ignorance prodded to sublime pain as he processes each bit of information. In support, Sally Hawkins, who embodies a very specific war-time archetype, and Charlotte Rampling, who brings her kink to the headmistress who carries the truth hidden in her heart, are exceptional.

Rachel Portman’s score should be hard to beat for her second Oscar. I expect it will stand alone as beautifully as it stands in the film.

There is remarkable work from cinematographer Adam Kimmel, editor Barney Pilling, production designer Mark Digby, and set decorator Michelle Day, amongst a mighty crew. Major hat tap to Tessa Ross, for this exec producing this film as well as new films from Danny Boyle and Mike Leigh, amongst others.

But in the end, it comes back to Romanek, who cannot be said to have an oeuvre after just two feature films. But how I wish he would step up to the plate more often. The growth, in great part because of the content, since One Hour Photo, is profound. This film feels like the product of Kubrick and Malick’s bastard son. In fact, it seems to me that had Kubrick lived a bit longer and met Romanek, he might have handed AI to him instead of Spielberg. Truth be told, Romanek could make AI tomorrow and it would be so different, at the core, than Spielberg’s, that it would stand on its own. Where Spielberg bathed in iconography, Romanek would no doubt bolt the story to a wooden floor covered in used toys, never to be any more imaginary than a child could actually be.

What a year it has been for this young band of directors, already so well credentialed, but not yet seen as The Adults In The Room, succeeding The Coppola/Scorsese/Spielberg era. (Soderbergh is the man stuck between the eras.) With Jonze’s underrated and often-misunderstood Where The Wild Things Are, Corbijn’s The American, this film and Fincher’s The Social Network coming in less than a month, it’s like watching the next wave crashing on the beach, still not quite the in charge of the coast… but getting closer with each small wonder of a film… until they are undeniable. The level of the work… one sees so many good, competent films… but this is just a different level of ambition. It’s almost an unspoken Dogma-type grouping, without the effort to self-hype or to restrain creativity in any way. (Perhaps they will be known as The Palm Director’s Series Gang.)

Never Let Me Go is a masterpiece… a film we’ll be discussing, frame by frame, in schools, 20 years from now. I can only hope that this doesn’t mean it will be underappreciated now.

Maybe you need to have some Kathy in you to connect to it fully. Maybe not. Perhaps the Tommys and Ruths will not like what they see. And certainly, some people just don’t want to feel that much in a cinema. And that is certainly their right.

For me, Never Let Me Go is why I love cinema. It is smart and demanding and emotional and rigorous and profoundly artful. It is more than “a good story well told.” It is humanity on a screen. And it trusts us, as thinking, feeling adults, to do the work.

15 Responses to “Review – Never Let Me Go”

  1. Al E Ase says:

    It’s a long while since a review’s actually gotten me primed for a film. Nice one DP

  2. ManWithNoName says:

    This has been my most anticipated film of 2010 since I read the book a few months ago. This review has me very excited. Loved One Hour Photo.

  3. actionman says:

    Wonderful review, David. Totally summed it all up without spoiling a thing for someone (like me) who hasn’t read the book. I am EXTREMELY excited.

    However, it does feel like the sort of movie that is going to get a lot of hot buzz at first, and then leave tons of critics cold, jetting in and out of the theaters in three weeks. I hope I am wrong because the trailer gives off the impression that it is what you say — a masterwork.

  4. Michael says:

    Romanek has been an artist to watch since that breakthrough Nine Inch Nails video Closer. While many video directors are purely flash, Romanek’s work always was deeper. I think he has the potential to be another Fincher.

  5. Vicky says:

    The book was truly wonderful and I have high expectations for the movie. The cast is magnificent and i think they’ll all work together perfectly. I can’t wait to see this movie, I’ve been waiting for months.

  6. IOv3 says:

    Actionman, I got the same feeling but that will be a good thing for this blog, as David goes off on those who slam the film.

  7. Triple Option says:

    I didn’t realize that Garfield was the new Spidey. Yeah, that decision really makes sense. I did notice how great the music was though out. It’s not something I always do on initial viewings of films. I just liked that the film exercised self control. It could’ve suffered from being made “BIGGER” but it didn’t. I’ll have to check out the book. Conversely, I thought there was a bit more that could’ve been explored from the post boarding school period before I would attach the masterpiece label to it but excellent work all around.

  8. cho says:

    Great review! I’m very sad that so many other reviewers missed the whole point of this movie because they couldn’t get over the lack of rebellion. I’m relieved that there are intelligent critics like you willing to reflect and ponder over the themes of a movie, rather than express frustration because it doesn’t abide by a comfortable formula that spells out everything.

  9. Gilzow says:

    Every man is his own worst enemy.

  10. jannes says:

    good blog !
    watch movie online bestcinemahall.com download movies and watch movies and films online. good site

  11. The Suggest says:

    This is excellent information! Thanks so much for sharing your knowledge on this topic.

  12. Great website. Lots of helpful information here. I’m sending it to a few friends ans also sharing in delicious. And of course, thanks for your effort!

  13. I love to read your articles. You have an interesting writing style.

  14. Digital Life says:

    Hmm it seems like your post ate my first comment (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up what I wrote and say, I’m thoroughly like) your blog. I too am an aspiring blog blogger but I’m still new to everything. Do you have any tips for rookie blog writers? I’d really appreciate it.

  15. Kaley Cuoco says:

    I have yet to see this myself, but will be putting it in my Netflix queue for sure. Thank you for the insightful review!

Leave a Reply

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

Tsangari: With my next film, White Knuckles, it comes with a budget — it’s going to be a huge new world for me. As always when I enter into a new thing, don’t you wonder how it’s going to be and how much of yourself you are going to have to sacrifice? The ballet of all of this. I’m already imaging the choreography — not of the camera, but the choreography of actually bringing it to life. It is as fascinating as the shooting itself. I find the producing as exciting as the directing. The one informs the other. There is this producer-director hat that I constantly wear. I’ve been thinking about these early auteurs, like Howard Hawks and John Ford and Preston Sturges—all of these guys basically were hired by the studio, and I doubt they had final cut, and somehow they had films that now we can say they had their signatures.  There are different ways of being creative within the parameters and limitations of production. The only thing you cannot negotiate is stupidity.
Filmmaker: And unfortunately, there is an abundance of that in the world.
Tsangari: This is the only big risk: stupidity. Everything else is completely worked out in the end.
~ Chevalier‘s Rachel Athina Tsangari

“The middle-range movies that I was doing have largely either stopped being made, or they’ve moved to television, now that television is a go-to medium for directors who can’t get work in theatricals, because there are so few theatricals being made. But also with the new miniseries concept, you can tell a long story in detail without having to cram it all into 90 minutes. You don’t have to cut the characters and take out the secondary people. You can actually put them all on a big canvas. And it is a big canvas, because people have bigger screens now, so there’s no aesthetic difference between the way you shoot a movie and the way you shoot a TV show.

“Which is all for the good. But what’s happened in the interim is that theatrical movies being a spectacle business are now either giant blockbuster movies that run three hours—even superhero movies run three hours, they used to run like 58 minutes!—and the others, which are dysfunctional family independent movies or the slob comedy or the kiddie movie, and those are all low-budget. So the middle ground of movies that were about things, they’re just gone. Or else they’re on HBO. Like the Bryan Cranston LBJ movie, which years ago would’ve been made for theaters.

“You’ve got people like Paul Schrader and Walter Hill who can’t get their movies theatrically distributed because there’s no market for it. So they end up going to VOD, and VOD is a model from which no one makes any money, because most of the time, as soon as they get on the site, they’re pirated. So the whole model of the system right now is completely broken. And whether or not anybody’s going to try to fix, or if it even can be fixed, I don’t know. But it’s certainly not the same business that I got into in the ’70s.”
~ Joe Dante

Z Weekend Report