Archive for March, 2010

[PR] Composer John Barry to be honored at Ghent Film Festival

Friday, March 26th, 2010

John Barry_sm_sm.jpg
John Barry to receive the Lifetime Achievement Award at 10th anniversary of World Soundtrack Academy
(Ghent, Belgium) On October 21, 2010 the music of four-time Oscar winner, John Barry will be performed live in concert at the Ghent International Film Festival.The 80 -iece Brussels Philharmonic will perform selections from Barry’s scores including Goldfinger, Mary Queen of Scots, Out of Africa, Dances with Wolves and Midnight Cowboy, conducted by Nicholas Dodd. The concert will be accompanied by a video presentation of film clips. With the John Barry concert, the Ghent Film Festival will be continuing its tradition of showcasing memorable, award-winning film music in the form of live concerts. Previous editions have featured Ennio Morricone, Maurice Jarre, Elmer Bernstein, Hans Zimmer, Howard Shore and Alexandre Desplat. Go here for more information.

The Internet, seen from 1969

Friday, March 26th, 2010


Prescient! [Via Kottke.]

Ebertfest Line-Up

Friday, March 26th, 2010

The College of Media at Illinois Presents
ROGER EBERT

From BIFF

Friday, March 26th, 2010

There have been some terrific movies on display here at the 12th Bermuda International Film Festival. But there are two at which Americans should take a serious look.
One is for filmmakers… Last Days of Emma Blank. It’s a little bit Dogma and a little bit Swedish meatball. But it feels a lot like what could be the next step for the mumblecore movement. More structured… more stylized… better shot… and still cheap as hell to make.
The second is for IFC and Magnolia, really… Reel Injun, a doc about natives in the movies… image and reality. Quite a special piece, along the lines of Not Quite Hollywood. It’s not a financial world beater and even though the film has been cleared by Canadians, I would be a little nervous being sure that it would clear in a domestic release… lots of film footage. But really good stuff. Like Chris Rock’s Good Hair, it manages to get into some tough ethnic turf without being either patronizing, onanistic, or bone dry.

Chicks and Anime

Friday, March 26th, 2010

Really excellent piece on the Guardian by Anne Billson on tough girls in anime (thanks once again to Ray Pride, who unearths the most interesting stories on the internet for our readers). This piece is completely spot-on, and really speaks to what attracts both me and my 13-year-old daughter Neve to anime and manga. Well, that and the fact that the best manga and anime consistently offer more interesting stories and character development than most books and films aimed at kids these days.

On The Finke for Sale Stuff

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

My first thought is sleepy.
My second thought is, put Nikki in charge of The Hollywood Reporter… two birds killed with one stone.
Third thought… Jay Penske’s best play right now would be to buy The Hollywood Reporter, not put Nikki in charge of anything but what she does, and to leverage the print aspect of the dying paper, because without it, he is never going to make a dollar of profit on the Finke/Fuller/Fool’s Gold Mail.com empire.
Ironically, print is the only thing that web sites do not do and cannot do as well or better than print. 15 Finke/Fleming blog-like (meaning none of these features where Nikki attempts to come up with a full thought) stories a week that are print exclusive to The Penske Reporter would make it a must-read again. Must-read means that the magazine is opened and sits in offices. That remains they can sell covers again.
Fourth thought… is there a single reason to think of any of this for more than a second other than the disposition of the existing trades? Is Sharon Waxman really so completely lacking in knowledge about her own business that she doesn’t get that the most significant source of Finke’s numbers is the Drudge Report, which delivers hundreds of thousands of views every single week? And why don’t people who are in a position to know realize that the best numbers ever reported are still not being translated into real money?
ADD, 4:10a MCDTThe denial of having made Crazy Nikki and offer from Richard Beckman, I have to say, reeks of a non-denial denial. The precision of the language – “there is no truth to the report that the site’s editor has been offered the job of editor-in-chief” – suggests that though Nikki may not have been offered the E-I-C job, she may well have been offered something else altogether… something even more lucrative. I don’t know a person on the face of the earth – aside from CN herself – who thinks Nikki can manage another human being without turning it into a CSI episode within weeks. Really, I don’t even think that Nikki thinks she is a manager.
Of course, this all gets batted around, with Waxman trying to prove she was right, Nikki pulling the kind of public stunt – making public claims about an offer – that shows why anyone choosing to be in business with her is as insane as she is, and The Hollywood Reporter trying not to look like it’s a joke.
Again, the key idea here that is lost is that Nikki is a single and singular voice… not a website beyond her own voice… and not a business model. If Sharon wants what Nikki has, she should shut down the site, lose the overhead, and start raking more muck. But she is not up to being Nikki – and anyone who is should be hospitalized – and so, she wants to be Variety As told By Arianna… but that is a delusion as the Variety she wanted to be no longer exists and Sharon’s husband is lovely, but not gay, not a billionaire, and not a means to a self-serving end.
Nikki is a grinder. Sharon is a dilettante.
After all these years, I have a lot more respect for the grinder. She is out of her f-ing mind and a truly hateful, pathetic individual… but as Ms. Summer sang, she works hard for the money… harder than anyone else. And no matter how vile the result, there is something honorable in being the object she has become after a career of self-imposed failure.
Right now, Nikki is the glow in the suitcase in Pulp Fiction. It makes people crazy because they think it can, somehow, fix their problems. It can’t.
Or maybe the better analogy is the Ark of the Covenant in Raiders… open it up and it melts your face… and we are all better served by it being lost in a warehouse.
Anyway… one last thought… whenever Nikki claims to be traveling or sick, it’s almost always something else going on in her land of high drama. Sometimes it is her trying to kill a story about her. Sometimes it is a business dance. But “travel in Europe” is likely code for “I’m going to the bunker.”
I will be happy when all of this goes away… and it will. But even though I am as bored with it as most of you, it is a part of the industry. So I feel compelled to keep writing on and around it.

On The Oscar Date…

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

Am I misreading or are people forgetting that the ONLY reason that Oscar was pushed 2 weeks this year was because of the Winter Olympics? Moving back to its mid-Feb date is not a surprise in any way.
And did people not get that the $2.5b+ grossing movie drove the ratings up this year and that it had nothing to do with the March berth?
The smart move – and former producers of the telecast have said this would make their job nearly impossible – would be to go even earlier… the weekend before or after the Super Bowl. But like I said… won’t happen.

Wilmington on Movies: How to Train Your Dragon, Hot Tub Time Machine, Chloe, and The Eclipse

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

How to Train Your Dragon (Three Stars)
U.S.; Dean De Blois/Chris Sanders, 2010

The visual flash and dash that the new Dreamworks animated saga How to Train Your Dragon pours into its panoramic 3D scenes of ferocious Medieval battle and Viking sea quests — and especially this movie’s Avatar-like flying sequences, with (more…)

"Unloveable": Johnny Depp directs a video

Thursday, March 25th, 2010


A little bit “An Occurence At Owl Creek Bridge”…

Trailering Scott Pilgrim vs. the World

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

It's not what you WON'T run, Tim… it's what you WILL run.

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

I am always pleased to see Patrick Goldstein embracing blogging and the web… it’s take him long enough to stop treating the web like… well, like he now is smacking Variety for treating it.
I will give it to Patrick, 100%… he made the call to Tim Gray and got Tim to make transparent what Variety has been trying to do without acknowledgment for years now… and without being quite a cut and dried ( or is that “cut and pasted”?) about it, the LA Times has also been doing for years as well. LAT, especially in its blog space, and NY, especially via Dave Itzkoff and, earlier, David Carr, have gotten a lot better. So I am happy to let bygones be bygones on this front.
Patrick writes – Gray insists that it’s not a knee-jerk reaction “to someone getting some news two minutes before we do and us throwing a hissy fit. It’s [being done] in instances where it was obvious that the story had been fed to an outlet before everyone got it.” Gray added that he’s also talked to reps at talent agencies, a prime source for most announcement-oriented leaks.
Well… with respect to Tim, two minutes is about the length of an “exclusive” these days. And 95% of movie industry news starts – and often ends – with the “news” being “fed to an outlet.” Same as it’s been for decades… only those outlets are no longer just The Trades, the LAT, the NY Times, or Geek Site A, B or C.
Speaking to the exec that Patrick spoke to – yes, Virginia… he reported AND blogged at the same time!!! – “It’s a terribly analog way of thinking in a digital world,” said one studio PR chief. “It’s just a totally unrealistic response, since if we’ve learned anything about the flow of information these days, it’s that it gets out in all sorts of uncontrollable ways. The minute we have a meeting or make a decision, it’s up on someone’s blog. We’re not the announcer anymore. We’re the responder to what someone’s already written. All we can do most of the time is damage control.”
This is the truth. And this is a lie.
And that is a much bigger news story than the dying embers of Variety appealing to publicists to throw them a bone so the egos that need to be stroked will have something to frame that isn’t printed out from a computer.
It is true that information is being disseminated by sources that are not the studio publicity offices. For one thing, Nikki Finke won’t deign to speak to lowly senior publicists, except if she needs someone to yell at maliciously and vulgarly on a weekend morning and is afraid of burning the bridge with the boss. But more significantly, information is being squeezed out of both ends and through holes in the middle of the studio toothpaste tube. By the time the top publicist at a studio is ready to send something out – often still selecting one outlet to get “the scoop” – it’s already been leaked by their bosses or their assistants. And truly irritating to them… they almost never know which one it is.
I have learned, after a lot of loud conversations, to be sympathetic to these men and women, who are not being allowed to do their job. I have also learned to be endlessly skeptical about how each situation occurs because now there is always plausible deniability. And sometimes, it’s true. And sometimes, it’s a publicist doing what they need to do… lying.
The benefit of “breaking news” in the trades has long been that it breaks, mostly, the way the studios/publicists/agents/managers/etc want it to break. But with the print editions of the trades going to less than 30,000 people a day during the non-Oscar seasons, more eyeballs online than off, with information flying at the speed of Twitter, and a bunch of websites every bit as willing to lie down for spin as The Trades ever were – even better, some being so weak in industry knowledge that they don’t even know they are being abused – there is no reason to stick to one outlet to dump your “news.”
Of course, it’s not just Nikki. You see stuff planted all over the place, virtually every day, including the NY and LA Times. Nikki is pretty much full-time servicing her Nikki Whisperers. Endeavor (nee’) should be paying her by the hour because they work her ass and work it hard.
With Nikki, we know that 90% of the time, it’s coming from the boss, their corporate, or someone in the Ari Emanuel army. With Patrick, it’s “friendlies.” With The Wrap, it’s a mix of a more traditional trade reporter – Joe Adalian – who actually does the TV work he’s done with added speed and internet style and a parade of others who are either not breaking much or hearing it third hand. At indieWIRE, it’s almost always the publicists who chose to go there first. And the LAT it’s long relationships and stuff on the over, cooking on simmer, all the time. And NYT is rarely the news breaker, unless it’s actual news or some publicist actually got to hang onto the “scoop” long enough to get it to The Paper of Record and who has news that actually can stand up to a few real questions. (Unfortunately, the longer form coverage is almost always riddled with mistakes of fact and opinion.)
Every studio has a varying degree of willingness to feed the maw. Some bosses truly fear Nikki and/or feel they control her enough that they will put their teams in harms way to maintain that control. Some less so. They all know that if they give the “news” to someone else, they will pay a price with Nikki… more so in angry abusive exchanges than in any form of power she wields. Her actual power remains the power of a playground bully. One slap back and she folds like a deck of cards. But this is an industry of fear and self-loathing.
Agents, who have always been the primary source for leaked news in “Hollywood,” should probably just open a blog or two of their own. But why bother? Everyone thinks of Nikki as a ball-busting bitch… so her willingness to carry their water is worth so much more.
Variety can fight back in one way and one way only. And that one way would likely win them this battle. Find someone who is willing to be as pliable and vicious as Nikki. I mean, I hope they won’t. But that is the game. Roger Friedman is a bottom dweller, but he doesn’t have the stomach to be what Nikki is. Either does Wells. Truth is, I don’t know anyone ambitious and desperate enough. But there has to be some 28 year old out there who is. Do what LA Weekly did… find someone who can’t keep a job because they are abusive and unreliable. (And no, Anita Busch is not even close to Nikki in this regard.)
Maybe Tim Gray should start calling people names on the front page. Maybe run a daily rundown of which execs are screwing which stars, agents, or other execs. It wouldn’t be journalism, but it would get their attention.
All that said… what really fascinates me about all of this is… these people are all fighting over the same tract of dying acreage. Are more of us being drawn into it because it’s become such a competitive area… even though there are a fixed number of interested readers and the primary outlets for this news are slowly going out of business?
It strikes me that a lot of energy is going into a ground war in Southeast Asia. It’s not even Iraq, where at least there is some oil to consider stealing.
But getting back to the original story… this is hardly news… however much quantifying it may be. If another outlet is handed a story or an EXCLUSIVE piece of any kind of content – I consider most movie news to be about as weighty as a new poster or trailer – we’re not likely to link to it unless the elements are high profile or in some other way Important. The standard is higher. And God knows, we feel that going the other way. The amount of MCN Exclusive content that is mined, but never linked by “competitors” is endless. And that is just the way it is. For a long time, if something broke in somewhere other than Variety, it would not run in Variety or it would run days later on an inside page.
Variety is dying. And if it wants to change the playing field, it needs to rethink the whole thing in a real way. Variety suffers from what much Old Media suffers from… the combination of arrogance that domination built and is no longer valid and the comfortable relationship it has with the industry that keeps it from playing as hard as others.
But before it decides what to do, it needs to get over the embarrassment and take a hard look at the competition. Unless Variety wants to become a single page blog or produce a lot less content, there is no online-only film industry news model that comes close to covering their rent, much less the cost of operations. Be careful what you wish for.

Trailering David Simon's "Treme"

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

[PR] Oscar's moving back to February

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

Welles, I was saying.gif
Key Dates Announced for 83rd Academy Awards®
Beverly Hills, CA (March 25, 2010) — The 83rd Annual Academy Awards will be presented on Sunday, February 27, 2011, Academy President Tom Sherak announced today. The ceremony will again take place at the Kodak Theatre at Hollywood & Highland Center® in Hollywood, and will be televised live by the ABC Television Network. Key dates currently scheduled are:

(more…)

The Ugliest Part Of The Sandra Bullock Thing…

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

… is Us.
Not US. Us. The collective Us that wants to read more about the piece of shit human being who leveraged her stardom and Oscar success for maximum sales value to damage Ms Bullock as loudly as possible. The collective Us that gets of on all the different ways a story like this allows Us to judge Them. The collective Media Us that should cry Ourselves to sleep each night, disgusted by what We see in the mirror.
I like to gossip as much as the next person. It’s a natural instinct. But even gossip has been lessened in the current era. Everything is disposable.
I get surprised, emotionally, every time these things blow up. And I get sick to my stomach. And like so many things that are, simply, wrong in this world, I am powerless to do much about it… except not to contribute to it more. Venality is just too powerful… and has been from the day the snake talked Even into biting that apple.

Robert Rodriguez Offers a Sneak Peek at Predators

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

A bold new chapter in the Predator universe, Predators was shot on location under Rodriguez’s creative auspices at the filmmaker’s Austin-based Troublemaker Studios, and is directed by Nimrod Antal. Starring Adrien Brody as Royce, a mercenary who reluctantly leads a group of elite warriors who come to realize they’ve been brought together on an alien planet… as prey.


Predators

Kevin Smith vs. Film Critics

Thursday, March 25th, 2010


By now you’ve probably heard about this whole  Eric D. Snider, who Tweeted back thusly: “I don’t care what @thatkevinsmith thinks about movie reviews unless he paid to read them.”

Let’s be clear here: attending free screenings is a privilege, not a First Amendment right, but it is a privilege that, generally speaking, benefits the studios as well as the critics. If they really have a stinker, they don’t screen for critics, period. If they think they have a shot at some positive marks from the critical community, or just want the publicity that even bad reviews bring for a critic-proof movie like Transformers (or one whose director has a loyal fanbase, like, say a Kevin Smith movie) they screen their film and critics are invited to see their films early. But yes, seeing films early, and for free, is a privilege, however struggling and underpaid most critics actually are.

Earlier this month we had the big brouhaha over film critic Armond White getting his shorts in a twist over being uninvited from a screening of Noah Baumbach‘s new film, Greenberg. I defended Baumbach’s right to ban Armond White from a screening of his film; first of all, it’s not a First Amendment issue, and second, White has a history of personal attacks on Baumbach. It’s Baumbach’s film, and if he doesn’t want to let a guy who’s shown repeatedly that his feelings about the filmmaker (and his mother) are clearly personal, that’s his right. And if Smith wants to stab himself in the gut by following through on his TwitterTantrum ™, that’s certainly his right, too.

However, Smith’s logic — that there’s somehow more value in a review if the reviewer paid to see it —  is inherently, well, stupid. Particularly when he says things like, “Not just any shlub off Twitter can do it!” I say “Yes, they can.” and “I’ve got longevity on my side now. I’ve been doing this since 93: so 17 years. I’m a veteran of the film biz. And as a veteran – not just some spectator with an opinion – I think I know what’s better for me & my career than total strangers whose Google-able history proves they’ve NEVER had my best interests at heart.”

Geez, Kevin. Generalize much?

I might as well make the argument that, rather than watch or review one of Smith’s films — heck, the work of anyone who’s a “professional filmmaker” —  I’d be just as well off picking 500 random douchebags from Twitter to shoot a movie with their Flipcams and review those instead. After all, doesn’t the ability to aim a Flipcam and push that “on” button make someone as qualified to make a movie as Smith with his 17 vaulted years of experience in the craft? No? Heck, screw Kevin Smith, even Scorsese, let’s get that guy with the YouTube video of his sock puppets up there on the big screen!

By Smith’s own argument, his years of experience at his job make him an expert in his field, but the experience of folks who have worked years as film critics means jack-all, because anyone with access to the internet can Twitter an opinion about a film. Utter bullshit, Kevin. Does the presence of a million dweebs who put up random YouTube videos invalidate your profession?

See, this is the problem inherent with Twitter. People get on there and start babbling, and either what you have is what we saw out of SXSW, with countless meaningless posts about eating BBQ and waiting in lines and who’s standing next to whom at parties, or you get people getting into verbal fisticuffs with all their Tweet-peeps and Tweet-enemies like some onlineWest Side Story knock-off. It’s ridiculous. Now Smith has put this out there, and what is he going to do? Back down and say, “Hey guys, whoops, sorry! I got a little worked up and carried away there and pissed off a bunch of folks who have actually been really supportive of my career, and I’m taking back the whole ‘not going to screen for critics anymore’ nonsense?” Not likely. Smith, historically, is not one to be the bigger man in his online battles.

I, like most of my friends in the critical community, actually like Smith, in spite of his penchant for wearing shorts around Sundance and mouthing off. He’s generally entertaining, and he writes good scripts, even if he doesn’t always direct them well. I’ve liked most of his films — yes, even Mall Rats. But when a grown man throws a temper tantrum online like some recalcitrant 14-year-old ranting on Twitter about his mom telling him his room is messy and he needs to clean it already, that is just sad. Seriously, Kevin, grow up or grow some balls and learn to take a little criticism, even when you make a film that’s just supposed to be “fun.” Fun does not equal crap, however many stoner fanboys might think it does. You’re not above critique.

- by Kim Voynar

March 25, 2010

When Brad Bird Finally Goes Live…

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

He deserves his own place at the table.
Bird already has passed on offers, like the His Dark Materials franchise at New Line. Too many cooks. And if he took an offer to do Mission:Impossible IV, he would be under Tom Cruise’s thumb in a way that few really enjoy.
Marvel/Disney should be offering him any character he wants… DC/WB the same.
As for M:I4, they should just hire Pierre Morel and get on with it. It’s not brain surgery. They aren’t going to let the director influence the script too much anyway… which is why Kevin MacDonald is probably not a good idea, even though he would be good for the franchise.

Two Pirates Walks Into Twitter…

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

It’s always awkward to discuss these things without feeling like you’re encouraging something illegal, but this afternoon, someone sent along a link to the new Twitter feed for a movie piracy web site, now being “followed” by 653 and “following” 1202. The tweets are just links to downloads of movies, from Avatar to Shutter Island and on down.
The website, which is linked, instructs viewers on how to do the illegal download with a little video that runs on Vimeo.
In all cases, the words “download” and “movies” are happily displayed, yet none of this has been intercepted.
Ah, the joys of free social networking for the purpose of theft…

The End of At the Movies

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

So Disney is finally closing the door on the long-running At the Movies. I feel sad for my friend Michael Phillips and for AO Scott, two very smart guys who just couldn’t draw the audience, I guess, to justify keeping the show afloat. It’s a business thing, from Disney’s standpoint.
And I agree with the many who have said that the show died with Gene Siskel, and that Richard Roeper never quite filled his shoes, whether because he’s never been embraced as a “real” critic within the critic community or because there weren’t the fights and fireworks between him and Roger that so defined the dynamic between Roger and Gene. Richard is a very nice, smart guy, but the chemistry between him and Roger never had that “snap” to it, and I think that’s largely because Siskel and Ebert were equals and Ebert and Roeper were not.
But I also have to wonder if it’s just that the time for television show where two guys talk about movies is just past. The advent of the internet, the ready availability of opinions and debates and reviews and online videos of people talking about film … maybe people are just oversaturated and the attitude of most folks was just, who cares about this show?
Here’s what would maybe work: A Survivor-type show where critics are pitted against each other on teams. Todd McCarthy and Harry Knowles can lead the competing tribes — old guard print critics versus new guard onliners.
Last critic standing gets to keep his or her job.

The Informant!

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

An appealing bait-and-switch tale, pretty much based upon true events, Steven Soderbergh’s The Informant!, has been released by Warner Home Video. Channeling William H. Macy, Matt Damonstars as an executive in a large food conglomerate who confesses to the FBI that he has been involved in a worldwide price fixing scam when he is called in on the investigation of another matter. He agrees to help gather evidence against his supervisors, but the case unfolds in a number of unexpected ways. Scott Bakula co-stars. Although set in the Nineties, Soderbergh uses a Marvin Hamlisch musical score and title card typefaces that evoke the Seventies, with perhaps the reason for this being the same untethered spirit that informs the narrative and motivates the hero. The film has a satisfying level of sophistication in the complexity of the deals the hero is involved in that plays well against the inherent humor of his distracted and guarded personality.

The picture is presented in letterboxed format only, with an aspect ratio of about 1.85:1 and an accommodation for enhanced 16:9 playback. As usual, Soderbergh does his own, typically murky, bland cinematography, which is transferred as well as it can be amid the haze. The 5.1-channel Dolby Digital sound has a reasonably effective mix and is adequately delivered. There are alternate French and Spanish tracks in 5.1 Dolby, optional English, French and Spanish subtitles, and 6 minutes of deleted scenes that often hit the nail too square on the head, although a couple are quite funny.

The Blu-ray can do nothing to rescue the cinematography and in fact, the way these things work, it actually makes it look worse, as you are more aware of how fuzzy everything is. The sound is better detailed, but the differences are minor. The subtitling and special features are carried over from the DVD, with one additional feature (which really belongs on a DVD for reasons of convenience), a commentary track featuring Soderbergh and screenwriter Scott Z. Burns. It is a reasonably informative talk, going over both the making of the film and the background of its subject. Near the end, they talk about how badly the film did in previews, but anticipate, since they were recording the track before the film’s commercial release, that the boxoffice gross would prove the previews wrong. Sorry guys, didn’t happen. They also, at another point, demonstrate an obliviousness to irony as they digress into a discussion of candy corn and how it has ‘no corn in it,’ when in fact, as the opening narration of the film clearly lays out, the candy, like practically every other food item, is loaded with corn syrup.

- by Douglas Pratt

Douglas Pratt’s DVD-Laser Disc Newsletter is published monthly.
For a free sample, call (516)594-9304 or go to his website at www.DVDLaser.com