

SamLowry on: Review-ish: Star Trek: Into Darkness (spoiler-free)
Etguild2 on: Review-ish: Star Trek: Into Darkness (spoiler-free)
jesse on: Review-ish: Star Trek: Into Darkness (spoiler-free)
SamLowry on: BYOB: Gone Francin'
PcChongor on: Cannes Catch Up
SamLowry on: Review-ish: Star Trek: Into Darkness (spoiler-free)
Jake Howell on: Cannes Catch Up
Etguild2 on: Cannes Catch Up
Etguild2 on: Review-ish: Star Trek: Into Darkness (spoiler-free)
Mohammed on: Cannes Catch Up
Review-ish: Star Trek: Into Darkness (spoiler-free)
DP/30: Erased, actor Aaron Eckhart
Cannes Day 2: Girls Just Wanna Have… (Part 2 of 2)
Cannes Day 2: Girls Just Wanna Have… (Part 1 of 2)
Star Trek Babies 2: Spoiler Space (Spoilers)
see all »
RT @erickohn: BORGMAN = OUTSIDE SATAN PART 2: THE SUBURBS #cannes
RT @letsgetgizzy: When I share good news with people, I feel like Will Smith talking to the mannequins in I Am Legend.
RT @devincf: This is a great picture of me. http://t.co/4UB3Lc2ST3
DP: I wish RT @RoseKuo: RT @leithaitken: Is Ari Folman's 'The Congress' The Most Anti-Hollywood Movie Ever Made? http://t.co/7J52nyqhnK
DP: @Organic_Shadow No one aside from media and obsessives really care abt spoilers or check into them. They watch trailers and ads
“One of the things I wish I could do in my life would be to watch this film through somebody else’s eyes. I just can’t. I still see it as just a giant mess, and other people are seeing that it has a shape. That’s really exciting, because I still have a hard time seeing it clearly.”
~ Sarah Polley’s Greatest Wish About Stories We Tell
“Anyway, Hitchcock eventually saw a rough cut of High Anxiety. He enjoyed it. But he said nothing after it. He just left. I [thought he] wasn’t happy. The next day, about 11 o’clock in the morning, I get this enormous, beautiful case of Chateau Haut-Brion 1961. That was almost 20 years old [at the time]. I mean, it was priceless. And there were magnums six of them, in a wooden case. Haut-Brion. I mean, oh my God. I’ve still got three of them left waiting. I keep all the good wines.”
What kind of occasion is worthy? When will you know it’s time to go into number four?
“A real, real occasion. I won’t drink it just because it’s a family occasion. I’ll drink it with guys that know what a good wine is and care about, you know, exquisite wines. I have a couple of friends that know what a good wine is.”
~ Mel Brooks, Foodie

Any idea why DP30 videos don’t work in Safari? I always have to open firefox to view them…
my plea re: best picture.
what good comes of Avatar winning Best Picture?
nothing.
It has money, mainstream success, and technilogical innovation. but it does nothing for cinema as an art.
what does rewarding it (or Cameron) accomplish? Does it do anything to help inspire the medium?
hurt locker is a small film that has accomplished so much. a war movie for this generation. the revelation of the kind of director Bigelow is. The discovery of Jeremy Renner, the validation of Mackie. Hurt Locker proved so much.
Avatar showed what a talented guy with limitless funds can accomplish.
hurt locker showed what a talented gal can do with a little bit of money and a whole lot of talent.
avatar’s success is it’s own reward. thinking that it deserves and award for being ‘best’ is kind of insulting and short sighted.
to me, the point of award season is not just honoring the best, but believing that those awarded were so because it was the right choice.
Think back to 92 when Pacino won Best Actor for Scent of a Woman. Was there anyone who really believed that Pacino deserved the award for that performance, or for the great body of work he had delivered over the years.
Can anyone make the argument that Avatar is the Best Picture? Were the performances so powerful? Was the story that original? Are people going to vote for Avatar because it was this technological marvel and the closest thing we’ve had to a cultural pheomenon in years?
Bigelow v. Cameron for Director
Bigelow. Because she directed a movie with real characters, real situations, and made an Iraq war movie that didn’t take sides or make statements, but transport viewers into the intensity of the modern day battlefield.
Cameron. Because he is so hands on. Even on projects of this magnitude. Marvel at what he can accomplish with limitless resources. The only guy whose imagination matches the money required to put it on screen. But he still directs actors like Lucas. He might be a lot more talky, but he’s still just little more than “Faster, More Intense!”
hurt locker is far more deserving of best picture.
and this is from a guy who would put Inglorious Basterds, An Education, and District 9 as better pictures.
still, if it comes down to hurt locker v. avatar, i don’t understand how anyone could vote avatar with any degree of seriousness.
i’d be interested to hear someone’s case for avatar without using ‘technical innovation’ or ‘financial success’ as reasons.