MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland

20 Weeks To Oscar – 16 Days To Go.


10 Responses to “20 Weeks To Oscar – 16 Days To Go.”

  1. Chucky in Jersey says:

    ABC is having major difficulty selling ad time in the Oscar telecast. Sweet!

  2. Baudolino says:

    Dave, the link to the actress/supporting actress chart directs to the best picture chart.

  3. Crow T Robot says:

    The Academy is clearly terrified of Avatar.
    They know, like the year’s critics and guild awards suggest, that it’s a corny movie.
    They’ve already awarded the plot and story of Dances With Wolves.
    They’ve already awarded Cameron for a much better film.
    They’ve already awarded f/x heavy geek action epic Return of The King.
    And they know in their hearts that awarding a supposed work of art mostly for its financial and technical success (as Poland suggests in his very Poland way) is really cynical.
    But, despite all of the above, they do know that Avatar represents the best grab at cultural relevancy they’ve had in years. It is without a doubt the biggest thing on the planet.
    So it’ll be fun to see if they’re willing to sacrifice integrity for relevance.
    So go Avatar! Any best picture winner that reveals the Oscars to be the self-serving clowns they are is okay with me.

  4. David Poland says:

    Uh… no, Crow. At least in terms of suggesting that I think that.
    I think the reality is that people, in the main, do like Avatar… a lot. They appreciate it as more than an effects show. Some don’t. But I think most people I hear from, including Academy members, do.
    The issue of “the narrative” is not “the truth,” it is “the narrative.”
    There is no lack of integrity in voting for Avatar… or they wouldn’t do it. It’s not like big is enough. It’s not.
    That said, the voters, historically, do reach beyond their personal taste about “the best” and they get herded.
    Fact is, if they vote for Hurt Locker, they were herded even more efficiently, as I would be shocked if more than 20% of Academy members had seen the film as for Dec 1.

  5. David Poland says:

    Fixed that now, Baudolino. And remember, those charts are over a month old now.

  6. movielocke says:

    “Fact is, if they vote for Hurt Locker, they were herded even more efficiently,”
    Thank you so much for saying that!
    I am sick and tired of the supposition that because a film is beloved by critics voting for it is somehow more honest than voting for a movie beloved by audiences. Hurt Locker is a terrific little film, and more voters by far were pressured into seeing it because of the nonstop critical praise. That’s not a bad thing, but it is certainly true that there were critical forces at work that ensured “right thinking” voters would nominate it. With enough unanimity critics can get a film championed, like Sideways, simply by working in lockstep to support a single ‘more worthy’ title.
    Here’s a question no one is asking: If Hurt Locker had been given a real release and flopped like every other Iraq war movie (like say The Kingdom) would we even be talking about it as a contender? no, we wouldn’t. Box office matters. Hurt Locker got in because it wasn’t presented to wide audiences, that meant it was safe for critics to like it and safe for the cineaste crowd to embrace it. Isn’t anyone else a little disgusted that the cineastes are suddenly discovering Bigelow and taking her seriously and enjoying her older pulpier films as some sort of lost art treasures? The films Bigelow has made in the past are exactly the sort of films widely scorned by cineastes who are “too good” to watch B-action movies. Now she’s a critical darling and not based on her merits, but based on the release strategy summit used.

  7. Dr Wally says:

    A pedant writes : In terms of Oscar disappointment, I don’t think Randy Newman comes even close to John Williams or sound maven Gary Rydstrom.

  8. Bob Violence says:

    Dunno who “the cineastes” are, but hardcore academic-type critics have been taking Bigelow seriously for awhile — she’s been written up in stuff like Cinema Journal Screen (the UK magazine, not Screen International) and FemSpec, Point Break was namechecked in the title of a study on “Feminist Hollywood”, and there’s an entire book rounding up various perspectives, like a Lacanian reading of Strange Days. All this predates The Hurt Locker (which incidentally was praised to the skies coming out of Toronto, even though nobody had any idea at the time what kind of distribution it would get). Bigelow herself actually comes from a theory/criticism background.

  9. Bob Violence says:

    ^Cinema Journal and Screen are two separate magazines, sorry ’bout that

  10. Bob Violence says:

    …and for “Toronto” read “Venice” (but it didn’t do badly at Toronto either)

Quote Unquotesee all »

“We don’t have any idea what the universe is. Wise people have always told us that this is proof you shouldn’t think, because thinking leads you nowhere. You just build over this huge construction of misunderstanding, which is culture. The history of culture is the history of the misunderstandings of great thinkers. So we always have to go back to zero and begin differently. And maybe in that way you have a chance not to understand but at least not to have further misunderstandings. Because this is the other side of this question—Am I really so brave to cancel all human culture? To stop admiring the beauty in human production? It’s very difficult to say no.”
~ László Krasznahorkai

“I have a license to carry in New York. Can you believe that? Nobody knows that, [Applause] somebody attacks, somebody attacks me, oh, they’re gonna be shot. Can you imagine? Somebody says, oh, it is Trump, he’s easy pickings what do you say? Right? Oh, boy. What was the famous movie? No. Remember, no remember where he went around and he sort of after his wife was hurt so badly and kill. What?  I — Honestly, Yeah, right, it’s true, but you have many of them. Famous movie. Somebody. You have many of them. Charles Bronson right the late great Charles Bronson name of the movie come on.  , remember that? Ah, we’re gonna cut you up, sir, we’re gonna cut you up, uh-huh.


One of the great movies. Charles Bronson, great, Charles Bronson. Great movies. Today you can’t make that movie because it’s not politically correct, right? It’s not politically correct. But could you imagine with Trump? Somebody says, oh, all these big monsters aren’t around he’s easy pickings and then shoot.”
~ Donald Trump