MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

20 Weeks To Oscar – 16 Days To Go.

It

Be Sociable, Share!

10 Responses to “20 Weeks To Oscar – 16 Days To Go.”

  1. Chucky in Jersey says:

    ABC is having major difficulty selling ad time in the Oscar telecast. Sweet!

  2. Baudolino says:

    Dave, the link to the actress/supporting actress chart directs to the best picture chart.

  3. Crow T Robot says:

    The Academy is clearly terrified of Avatar.
    They know, like the year’s critics and guild awards suggest, that it’s a corny movie.
    They’ve already awarded the plot and story of Dances With Wolves.
    They’ve already awarded Cameron for a much better film.
    They’ve already awarded f/x heavy geek action epic Return of The King.
    And they know in their hearts that awarding a supposed work of art mostly for its financial and technical success (as Poland suggests in his very Poland way) is really cynical.
    But, despite all of the above, they do know that Avatar represents the best grab at cultural relevancy they’ve had in years. It is without a doubt the biggest thing on the planet.
    So it’ll be fun to see if they’re willing to sacrifice integrity for relevance.
    So go Avatar! Any best picture winner that reveals the Oscars to be the self-serving clowns they are is okay with me.

  4. David Poland says:

    Uh… no, Crow. At least in terms of suggesting that I think that.
    I think the reality is that people, in the main, do like Avatar… a lot. They appreciate it as more than an effects show. Some don’t. But I think most people I hear from, including Academy members, do.
    The issue of “the narrative” is not “the truth,” it is “the narrative.”
    There is no lack of integrity in voting for Avatar… or they wouldn’t do it. It’s not like big is enough. It’s not.
    That said, the voters, historically, do reach beyond their personal taste about “the best” and they get herded.
    Fact is, if they vote for Hurt Locker, they were herded even more efficiently, as I would be shocked if more than 20% of Academy members had seen the film as for Dec 1.

  5. David Poland says:

    Fixed that now, Baudolino. And remember, those charts are over a month old now.

  6. movielocke says:

    “Fact is, if they vote for Hurt Locker, they were herded even more efficiently,”
    Thank you so much for saying that!
    I am sick and tired of the supposition that because a film is beloved by critics voting for it is somehow more honest than voting for a movie beloved by audiences. Hurt Locker is a terrific little film, and more voters by far were pressured into seeing it because of the nonstop critical praise. That’s not a bad thing, but it is certainly true that there were critical forces at work that ensured “right thinking” voters would nominate it. With enough unanimity critics can get a film championed, like Sideways, simply by working in lockstep to support a single ‘more worthy’ title.
    Here’s a question no one is asking: If Hurt Locker had been given a real release and flopped like every other Iraq war movie (like say The Kingdom) would we even be talking about it as a contender? no, we wouldn’t. Box office matters. Hurt Locker got in because it wasn’t presented to wide audiences, that meant it was safe for critics to like it and safe for the cineaste crowd to embrace it. Isn’t anyone else a little disgusted that the cineastes are suddenly discovering Bigelow and taking her seriously and enjoying her older pulpier films as some sort of lost art treasures? The films Bigelow has made in the past are exactly the sort of films widely scorned by cineastes who are “too good” to watch B-action movies. Now she’s a critical darling and not based on her merits, but based on the release strategy summit used.

  7. Dr Wally says:

    A pedant writes : In terms of Oscar disappointment, I don’t think Randy Newman comes even close to John Williams or sound maven Gary Rydstrom.

  8. Bob Violence says:

    Dunno who “the cineastes” are, but hardcore academic-type critics have been taking Bigelow seriously for awhile — she’s been written up in stuff like Cinema Journal Screen (the UK magazine, not Screen International) and FemSpec, Point Break was namechecked in the title of a study on “Feminist Hollywood”, and there’s an entire book rounding up various perspectives, like a Lacanian reading of Strange Days. All this predates The Hurt Locker (which incidentally was praised to the skies coming out of Toronto, even though nobody had any idea at the time what kind of distribution it would get). Bigelow herself actually comes from a theory/criticism background.

  9. Bob Violence says:

    ^Cinema Journal and Screen are two separate magazines, sorry ’bout that

  10. Bob Violence says:

    …and for “Toronto” read “Venice” (but it didn’t do badly at Toronto either)

Quote Unquotesee all »

“I really want to see The Irishman. I’ve heard it’s big brother Martin Scorsese’s masterpiece. But I really can’t find the time. The promotion schedule is so tight, there’s no opportunity to see a three and a half-hour movie. But I really want to see it. In 2017, right before Okja’s New York premiere, I had the chance to go to Scorsese’s office, which is in the DGA building. There’s a lovely screening room there, too, with film prints that he’s collected. I talked to him for about an hour. There’s no movie he hasn’t seen, even Korean films. We talked about what he’s seen and his past work. It was a glorious day. I’ve loved his work since I was in college. Who doesn’t? Anyone involved with movies must feel the same way.”
~ Bong Joon-ho

“But okay, I promise you now that if I ever retire again, I’m going to ensure that I can’t walk it back. I’ll post a series of the most disgusting, offensive, outrageous statements you can ever imagine. That way it will be impossible for me to ever be employed again. No one is going to take my calls. No one is going to want to be seen with me. Oh, it will be scorched earth. I will have torched everything. I’m going to flame out in the most legendary fashion.”
~ Steven Soderbergh