MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Miramax Moronics

If the New York Times’ source is right – and keep in mind, we are dealing with a notoriously iffy industry reporter at the NYT chasing down a source to confirm gossip that Nikki Finke was softly floating – than Disney will make yet another move that seems quick and decisive, but not very smart.
Unless Disney is having major cash flow troubles, $700 million or less will not change much of anything for the company. And in the process, they would be selling off a good-sized library that may, indeed, be worth less and less in the future. But it does create revenue now and though I am not a great believer in the long tail creating a big pot o’ cash, you never know.
What possible reason would a stable company have to sell off a library with dozens of classic and near-classic titles for so little money?
Oy!

5 Responses to “Miramax Moronics”

  1. EthanG says:

    Wow, what is going on with the mighty Mouse House. Perhaps they’re having the same problems Paramount had late last year? But it doesn’ make sense that they’d be flailing like this after the underperformance of a handful of films theatrically. They had the number 3 DVD of last year in “Up” just make major $$…

  2. anghus says:

    Can i bid 30,000 for Phantoms?

  3. Joe Leydon says:

    Just curious: Any theories regarding the steep drop in library value? I would think that as the cable and on-line outlets increase — have you ever really counted just how many pay-cable movie channels there are these days? — library values would be on the increase. Obviously, I am mistaken. Why? Too much short-term thinking? Or is it demo-driven? That is, are they finding that younger auds don’t care all that much about movies made more than a decade ago?

  4. Eric says:

    Joe, I’m no expert here but I suspect there was a “DVD bubble” for library titles. There was probably a large amount of speculation going on assuming that the DVD party would never end. When the DVD market slows, back catalog revenue starts to dwindle, and I wouldn’t think that expanding PPV options offsets that.

  5. Dr Wally says:

    Remember that about a decade ago Disney sold the rights to The Black Hole after underestimating the movie’s popularity amongst thirtysomething nostalgiasts, then shamefacedly had to buy the rights back at an inflated price when the Anchor Bay DVD sold like gangbusters.

Leave a Reply

The Hot Blog

Z

Quote Unquotesee all »

“Just got back from Dark Shadows at the Lincoln Square IMAX (102′ wide screen, over 50 sears per row). I loved almost every second of it. What a shock. I can see why people under 49 hate it, and it’s not just because of its ’60s TV roots–it’s a very traditional, classic-style horror film: leisurely-paced, character-driven, beautifully designed (mostly real sets, not CGI), music used as a humorous or ironic underline, not particularly violent (there’s more blood in the 1970 version), perfectly cast with superb actors, and of course a nice sense of humor to balance the horror. No jump scenes, no teens sliced to pieces by some mask-wearing non-entity, just good old-fashioned story-telling. It’s more like Hugo than Hostel, and not just because it shares cast members and underperformed. And as for the much-derided third act: the complaints are horseshit. Everything that takes place in the climax is logically built up to in what precedes it. Yes, the werewolf is a surprise, but it shouldn’t be given the family history and that character’s behavior, and the explanation is eminently reasonable. In an era where Bridesmaids is considered award-worthy writing, it’s no surprise that many people have forgotten what a well-made script can be like. So fuck all the haters. Dark Shadows lived up to my expectations (no small feat), and should be seen by everyone who still appreciates quality, grown-up, Old Hollywood-style filmmaking. Cadavra has spoken.”
~ Cadavra on Dark Shadows

‘This grooming and styling thing? It’s fucking poodles. Human poodles. I feel sorry for a poodle because he’s a dog. You know, a dog is a fucking great creature. They would do anything for you. And the poodle gets a haircut. No one asks if the poodle wants his hair cut like that. Do they? They just fucking cut his hair like that. And he just walks around. And everyone is like, “Why is that poodle so snarky?” Fuck you. Style, I think, is panache. Who are you? What did you do today? And what are you worth to me? What do you have to offer the world? How did you spend your time today on this planet? How are you spending your time every second? What are you doing now? Are you alive, or are you somnambulant? If you are somnambulant, then you are a fucking prick. Style is your ability to be awake. But who the fuck am I to judge? I’m starting to get really arrogant.”
GQ: Whose tuxedo did you wear on the red carpet here in Cannes?
“J.Lindeberg. Because I really love his suits.”
~ Stylin’ Tom Hardy

Z Z