Disney released this today. It’s not the 6 minutes of footage found on the Snow White & The Seven Dwarfs DVD release, which is the opening of the film, establishing the core qualities of the family The Princess comes from.
And yes, it does feel as though – as we go into this too conscious of the issues around the film – that Disney is managing the racial issues a bit. But that is a part of their job. And if you look at it without the built-in concerns about race, this is yet another piece that simply looks like the pitch for a classic Disney film.

Archive for September, 2009
More EPKing The Princess & The Frog
Monday, September 28th, 2009More Polanski…
Monday, September 28th, 2009The Key Pro-Polanski Rationalizations
1. He was going to be sentenced unfairly… so fleeing was okay.
2. It’s been so long, why is this still be pursued?
3. He shouldn’t have pleased guilty… so he should not be held accountable for having done so
4. He is a great artist and though we don’t want to say this out loud, he should be above these petty laws.
5. The girl and her mother have some responsibility in the matter.
6. The girl has forgiven him, so the law should too.
7. The butchering of his wife and child, as well as his history of escaping The Jewish Holocaust must have changed his sense of right and wrong… the man needed love and help and not punishment.
Answers To The Key Pro-Polanski Rationalizations
1. This is what appellate courts are for.
2. This is what Statutes of Limitations address… and Polanski took the time issue off the table by fleeing the country. In addition, he has repeatedly chosen not to face the charges in the United States, even though there have been clear indications of the case leaning in his favor now.
3. The failure of Polanski and his attorneys to choose a jury trial over a plea is their own, not even the terrible judge in the original case… and certainly not the judicial system as a whole.
4. He is a great artist… but you have to be kidding. Some very intelligent and well-intended people are, amongst the ivory tower arrogant fools, supporting this man. Where were they when OJ – one of the greatest athletes in history – was on trial? Ya… they decided he was guilty before any evidence was offered in court and didn’t want him to have a fair trial either… they just wanted him put in the electric chair… because artists and intellectuals should be more influential on criminal law than the courts or lawyers or the facts.
5. As in, “she was asking for it?”
6. “The Girl” also got a cash settlement from Polanski years ago. And how many rape victims don’t want to move on with their lives? Do people realize how many women – of age and underage – never report their rapes to the authorities… how many never tell the people in their lives that are closest to them?
7. Tell it to the judge. They are called extenuating circumstances. And if the sentencing judge was acting illegally, tell it to the judge who overturns him. You don’t get a free pass because you have suffered.
Sorry… I do think there are complex moral issues in play here. I do think that on a purely emotional level, there is some importance to Ms Geimer’s public forgiveness and to the length of time since the events and the attitude of many Europeans about the reasonable age of consent, etc, etc.
But I also believe in The Law as our best chance of structuring civil intercourse in this country. And I believe that no one is above The Law, including President Bush, Dick Cheney, and Roman Polanski.
I am pleased that amnesty was given to draft dodgers after Vietnam. It was morally righteous – in my opinion, though many people who served and who family members died serving might still disagree – and it was legal.
I believe that marijuana laws should be changed to reflect the realities of American use of the drug, that gun laws should be changed to reflect the realities of American use of guns, the marriage as a legal issue should not be allowed to be discriminatory under the Constitution, that abortion rights should be sacrosanct within limits that reflect medical consensus, etc.
If you want to change the law, change it. But breaking it is breaking it. Murdering Bush & Cheney on the day they were elected might have, quite literally, saved scores of thousands of lives, both American and Iraqi. But sorry… not acceptable.
There can be a debate between reasonable, well-intended people about what the statutory rape of a child by a grown man 30 years ago means today. I don’t think everyone who argues sympathy for Polanski is insane, stupid, or morally bankrupt.
But the idea that this is an extra-legal moral conundrum is the worst kind of moral relativism we on the left have engaged in here in America… which started back with Clinton lying under oath and then rationalizing that it was okay because it was sex – we can have the discussion over how consensual the blow-job of an employee half your age really is some other time – and because it was “personal.”
Why you commit perjury can be and generally is considered when it comes to the punishment for your illegal actions. it is completely reasonable to argue that the punishment of impeachment is excessive… even absurd. But the perjury is no less illegal because it was about a blowjob. Sorry.
Fleeing the country because you don’t anticipate the deal you thought you made for sentencing over the illegal act that you pleaded guilty about is not going to go the way you expected or like doesn’t become legal because the judge was trying to screw you over.
Where is the outrage of so many of these same people over men who have been sitting on death row for decades based on perjured testimony, judges who didn’t let in relevant testimony, or simply biased juries… even before we get to DNA issues?
He’s guilty… he admits he’s guilty… he ran… but we like him… so it’s okay.
Epic Fail.
If you want to make the argument, make a real argument.
I haven’t heard one yet.
P.S. I feel bad for the film festival that invited him and may feel responsible for the arrest… they get a moral pass from me for saying truly stupid things in response… they are being reactive… and that happens.
Finally, I Agree With Nikki
Monday, September 28th, 2009“Don’t you want to be on a beach somewhere when Nikki Finke starts flashing pictures of you trying to get your dick hard?”
“I’ll fuck Nikki Finke before I let her affect my business decisions.”
Pretty fair representation of Nikki Finke’s role in this industry. Whorey gossip… more interested in embarrassing others than finding or considering news in a smart way… ineffective against anyone who isn’t weak minded.
I don’t really believe she will put it on her tombstone. But she is well on her way to putting it on the tombstone of serious journalism about the film industry.
The New Yorker story on Nikki should arrive in the next couple of weeks. I plan on being out of the country.
A Building Theme In Media
Monday, September 28th, 2009David Carr double dips today, with his regular Monday media column and a bit in NYT’s Media Decoder blog. Both entries into The Conversation strike me as being of a kind…
From the column, about moguls – “Some of the blame falls at the feet of those of us who walk around with notebooks. We love new, we love sexy, and we are all about the moguls and the grand pronouncements and tend not to worry so much about performance.”
From the blog entry, about Twittering journos – “Every time a reporter hits send, he or she might do the following exercise: How would I feel if my mother and/or my boss read this? Because they well might, along with the legions of folks who sit, like crows on a wire, looking for any wiggle or wobble from media outlets they regard with suspicion in the first place. There will be stumbles and missteps on the way to a hybrid future, but if you can
A Christmas Carol Gets A New Trailer
Monday, September 28th, 2009BYOB – Gone Atonin'
Sunday, September 27th, 2009I Want to Live ’til Monday
Sunday, September 27th, 2009A trio of new titles couldn’t catch Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs for the weekend box office crown. Cloudy was hardly overcast as it dipped a modest 20% in its sophomore session to gross an estimated $24.4 million.
But it was disappointing returns for the freshman class. The science-fiction thriller Surrogatesranked second with $14.7 million and a slot behind the resurrected Fame clocked in with $10 million. Further down the list Pandorum was lost in space with $4.3 million.
Regional and niche activity proved to be more buoyant. In Canada, the big screen sequel to the TV hit The Trailer Park Boys raised significant laughs of $1.4 million and in Quebec Coco Before Chanel contributed about half of the North American box office of $340,000. On the Bollywood circuit there was OK response of $163,000 for What’s Your Raashee? At 77 sites.
Exclusives were dominated by a rousing $58,000 per screen for Michael Moore’s provocativeCapitalism: A Love Story at four venues. There were also initial signs of strength for the dramaThe Boys are Back of $48,700 from six screens and the spooky Paranormal Activity raised $85,300 at a dozen specialized sites. Also notably was the $21,700 Manhattan exclusive of Brief Interviews with Hideous Men.
Still, the alternative stream couldn’t stave off overall box office downturns.
Tracking had anticipated roughly a $20 million bow for Surrogates and the stylish marketing and intriguing premise appeared to be raising audience interest. However, there was some concern that ad images might be confused for a fashion or perfume promotion and the b.o. result suggest that there may have been some mixed messages.
Similarly Fame had some advance predictions at $15 million on the high side. And while the film displayed core appeal with a younger, female demo, there was limited response from the generation that remembered the 1980 original or its television spinoff.
The session also featured 502 Saturday sneaks for the upcoming distaff roller derby opus Whip It. It also attracted younger women and studio exits indicated an encouraging 65% overall capacity. Also of note, the latest Harry Potter crossed $300 million domestically.
Weekend revenues pushed toward $95 million that translated into a 7% erosion from the prior weekend. It was a slighter steeper 8% drop from 2008 when debuts of Eagle Eye and Nights in Rodanthe led with respective tallies of $29.1 million and $13.4 million.
The spectacular if limited first blush for Capitalism might just bear out that Michael Moore’s partisan political tilt fares better when examining the aftermath of catastrophe rather than getting into the fray as his prior effort Sicko did on health care. Regardless, he remains the rare bird as the preeminent non-fiction commercial dynamo.
Weekend Estimates: September 25-27, 2009
| Title | Distributor | Gross (avg) | % change | Theaters | Cume |
| Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs | Sony | 24.4 (7,820) | -20% | 3119 | 59.8 |
| Surrogates | BV | 14.7 (4,990) | New | 2951 | 14.7 |
| Fame | MGM | 10.0 (3,220) | New | 3096 | 10 |
| The Informant! | WB | 6.6 (2,530) | -37% | 2505 | 20.7 |
| I Can Do Bad All By Myself | Lionsgate | 4.7 (2,220) | -52% | 2120 | 44.5 |
| Love Happens | Uni | 4.3 (2,260) | -47% | 1898 | 14.7 |
| Pandorum | Overture | 4.3 (1,710) | New | 2506 | 4.3 |
| Jennifer’s Body | Fox | 3.3 (1,210) | -52% | 2738 | 12.1 |
| 9 | Focus | 2.8 (1,370) | -50% | 2025 | 27.1 |
| Inglourious Basterds | Weinstein Co. | 2.6 (1,320) | -32% | 1960 | 114.3 |
| All About Steve | Fox | 2.2 (1,120) | -35% | 1965 | 29.8 |
| Trailer Park Boys 2 | Alliance | 1.4 (6,980) | New | 202 | 1.4 |
| The Final Destination | WB | 1.4 (1,160) | -43% | 1175 | 64.6 |
| Julie & Julia | Sony | 1.2 (900) | -38% | 1328 | 90.5 |
| District 9 | Sony | 1.1 (1,150) | -45% | 925 | 113.5 |
| Sorority Row | Summit | 1.0 (660) | -60% | 1523 | 10.6 |
| G.I. Joe: Rise of Cobra | Par | .70 (780) | -49% | 895 | 147.3 |
| Bright Star | Apparition | .66 (5,090) | 248% | 130 | 0.95 |
| The Time Traveler’s Wife | WB | .53 (650) | -48% | 810 | 61.7 |
| Gamer | Lionsgate | .51 (650) | -64% | 780 | 20.1 |
| The Hangover | WB | .44 (1,240) | -6% | 355 | 274.5 |
| Weekend Total ($500,000+ Films) | - | $88.40 | - | - | - |
| % Change (Last Year) | - | -8% | - | - | - |
| % Change (Last Week) | - | -7% | - | - | - |
| Also debuting/expanding | |||||
| (500) Days of Summer | Fox Searchlight | .36 (880) | -44% | 414 | 31.6 |
| I Hope They Serve Beer in Heaven | FreeStyle | .35 (2,900) | New | 120 | 0.35 |
| Coco Before Chanel | Alliance/Sony Class | .34 (8,670) | New | 39 | 0.34 |
| My One and Only | FreeStyle | .27 (1,060) | -3% | 256 | 1.9 |
| Capitalism: A Love Story | Overture | .23 (58,010) | New | 4 | 0.3 |
| What’s Your Raashee? | UTV | .16 (2,120) | New | 77 | 0.15 |
| Paris | IFC | .12 (3,970) | 164% | 31 | 0.19 |
| Paranormal Activity | Par | 94,200 (7,850) | New | 12 | 0.09 |
| The Boys Are Back | Miramax | 48,700 (8,120) | New | 6 | 0.05 |
| The Providence Effect | Slow Hand | 29,300 (2,090) | New | 14 | 0.3 |
| Brief Interviews with Hideous Men | IFC | 21,700 (21,700) | New | 1 | 0.02 |
| The Blue Tooth Virgin | Regent | 2,240 (1,120) | New | 2 | 0.01 |
Domestic Market Share: To September 17, 2009
| Distributor (releases) | Gross | Mrkt Share |
| Warner Bros. (27) | 1592.2 | 20.40% |
| Paramount (13) | 1331.5 | 17.10% |
| Sony (17) | 951.1 | 12.20% |
| Fox (15) | 948.9 | 12.20% |
| Buena Vista (16) | 898.1 | 11.50% |
| Universal (17) | 691.2 | 8.90% |
| Lionsgate (10) | 296.8 | 3.80% |
| Fox Searchlight (9) | 234.3 | 3.00% |
| Weinstein Co. (8) | 177.9 | 2.30% |
| Summit (9) | 175.5 | 2.30% |
| Focus (8) | 137.1 | 1.80% |
| Paramount Vantage (4) | 67.5 | 0.90% |
| Miramax (6) | 51.8 | 0.70% |
| MGM (3) | 42.3 | 0.50% |
| Other * (237) | 187.9 | 2.40% |
| * none greater than 0.4% | 7784.1 | 100.00% |
Top Limited Releases – January 1 – September 24, 2009
| Title | Distributor (releases) | Gross (millions) |
| The Wrestler * | Fox Searchlight | 25,068,864 |
| Under the Sea 3D | WB | 17,528,485 |
| Milk * | Focus | 17,246,974 |
| The Hurt Locker | Summit | 12,441,192 |
| Sunshine Cleaning | Overture | 12,062,558 |
| Away We Go | Focus | 9,552,776 |
| Du Pere en flic | Alliance | 8,874,944 |
| Whatever Works | Sony Classics | 5,280,054 |
| Deep Sea 3-D | WB/Imax | 5,261,884 |
| Moon | Sony Classics | 4,843,670 |
| Entre les murs (The Class) | Sony Classics | 3,766,810 |
| The Brothers Bloom | Summit | 3,531,756 |
| Two Lovers | Magnolia | 3,149,034 |
| Magnificent Desolation * | Imax | 2,808,748 |
| Cheri | Mrmx | 2,715,657 |
| Rachel Getting Married * | Sony Classics | 2,696,170 |
| Easy Virtue | Sony Class/Alliance | 2,653,621 |
| Sin Nombre | Focus | 2,536,665 |
| Space Station * | Imax | 2,534,006 |
| * does not include 2008 box office |
Klady's Weekend Estimates
Sunday, September 27th, 2009
Running out the door, but here is Sony’s analysis, as I have no time to offer my own…
Cloudy With A Chance of Meatballs became the first animated film in 2009 to score back-to-back weeks as the #1 film in North America.
Cloudy took in $24.6 million this weekend for a 10-day cume to date of $60.036 million. The film showed exceptional strength from last weekend dropping only 19%. Like food falling from the sky, Cloudy
Polanski Intervention
Sunday, September 27th, 2009Roman Polanski is a brilliant director.
Roman Polanski has suffered great life tragedies of the type that often destroy people.
Roman Polanski is a bit of a coward.
Roman Polanski is in custody.
It kind of strikes me like an intervention. After years of self-imposed exile from the United States, Polanski has been dancing around coming back to face the music for years now. The exposure of misconduct by the judge – mostly suggested before Marina Zenovich’s documentary, but certainly given focus by the doc – and the victim’s active forgiveness of the man have suggested that he has a good chance of looking at little more than time served and perhaps, probation, as a price.
Because, ahem… he did fuck a little girl.
Sorry for the graphic language… but as brilliant as the man is, we should all keep in mind, no matter how much we now blame her mother, the girl herself, or the judge… no matter how forgiving the now-grown-woman is… a mature, aware man gave an underage girls drugs and had sex with her… and whether she wanted it (the drugs or the sex) or not, not many of us would be okay with that if it was our daughter or loved one in that position.
And to play The Devli’s advocate, is a life of freedom in Europe really such a severe punishment?
Of course, I have no problem with people feeling that enough time has passed, that his life has faced a limitation here, and that he is now being persecuted and not prosecuted. And I have no problem with people who disagree. What I feel personally… not the point.
But it seems like Polanski facing the music, whatever the legal tune, has been a long time coming… even just measuring the 7 years since The Pianist. And now, the hand of fate has reached him in a place he thought was safe, Switzerland, and it’s the LA DA’s move.
Interesting.
Finally, I must say, if the US does not demand extradition of the man in this situation, then the charges must be dropped fully. Holding him on a string of the threat of prosecution is not right if the government does not feel strongly enough to prosecute. So the next step is coming.
I suspect that Polanski will be in front of an LA judge by late this week. And if he is not, time to cut him loose. Either way, this should be the moment of resolution in this long, sad, very human story.
Tinsel
Sunday, September 27th, 2009My old high school pal Hank Stuever, who’s written for the Washington Post‘s Style section for a long time, has written one excellent book, Off Ramp: Adventures and Heartache in the American Elsewhere, and has a new book, Tinsel: A Search for America’s Christmas Present, coming out November 12 (just in time for your Christmas shopping!).
Hank writes with humor, warmth and great insight about real people and places, and he has a remarkable talent for finding the extraordinary in what seems, on the surface, to be commonplace. He posted a heartfelt, frustrated and, at times, angry piece on his blog, Tonsil, about the issues authors face in getting their books seen and sold.
Even if you’re lucky enough to have a publisher and a book deal, he writes, an author still has to get out there and push and promote his baby in the cold, hard world if he hopes to not have it whither away into obscurity. Although Hank’s publisher has arranged his book tour, he’s still largely responsible himself for getting to the tour stops and promoting himself and his book to get people to come out for his readings. And this is a guy with a book being published by a reputable publisher, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Honestly, I had no idea. But it sure reminds me of what indie filmmakers face in trying to get their babies seen and reviewed after pouring their heart, soul and limited bank accounts into making their films. So many talented people I know are creating amazing art — films, music, books — and just struggle and struggle to ever have it go anywhere. Society needs art and philosophy and films and books and music, but does so little to support those who have the creativity and talent to bring such things to life. It makes me sad.
As a regular reader of Hank’s excellent writing at the Post, and having read and absolutely loved Off Ramp, I can highly recommend Tinsel to anyone looking for a good book to give a friend or family member (or yourself, for that matter) for Christmas. (And for the record, Hank did not ask me to write about his book. I just believe in his writing and think he’s a marvelous author whose work very much deserves support and readership.) We who work in fields related to the arts need to support each other as much as we can … but just the same, I wouldn’t recommend Hank’s book if I wasn’t quite certain that it will be every bit as good as everything else he writes.
Best of luck with your new baby, Hank.
LexG Appears On SNL
Sunday, September 27th, 2009
Megan Fox continued to keep many of us wondering what her next act is, even if the show didn’t do much to surprise… the writing was as lame as it’s been in a long while…
But she did take shots that will be internet classics for a long time to come… (no, not a pun, Lex)…


Jennifer's Body: Good Feminist Horror, or Just a Bad Film?
Sunday, September 27th, 2009What with all the being sick lately, I didn’t get to catch Jennifer’s Body, but I have been keeping up with the reviews of the film. One of my favorite defenses of it so far can be found on the site Girldrive, in a thoughtful, well-written post titled “Jennifer’s Body and the feminists who hate it.”
In this piece, the author both defends the film and enumerates the reasons she feels it’s been inappropriately attacked by some critics (in particular, she takes issue with critics she feels are bashing the film as an extension of the ever-popular post-Juno Diablo Cody bashing).
I was led to the piece by Mary Ann Johanson, writing a weekly roundup for Alliance of Women Film Journalists. Johanson’s take on the Girldrive piece was very different from mine; she concludes her writeup with this: “And for me, or any feminist, to suggest that I must support any movie, no matter how good or bad it is, merely because women made it, is ridiculous.”
I don’t believe that was the point of the author at Girldrive at all. In fact, she explicitly says, “And I’m not implying that women should get off easy–just that they shouldn’t be written off after 31 years on earth and a meager two screenplays. Maybe Cody just wanted to have some campy, squeal-inducing fun. I’d argue that she succeeded, without exploiting young women or killing them off in rapid succession. Considering the sizeable chick carnage of other recent teen girl horror movies, that’s actually pretty radical.”
I haven’t seen Jennifer’s Body yet, so can’t weigh in one way or the other on whether I think it rocks or sucks, but I’d love to hear some input from those of you who have seen it. Radical feminist horror manifesto, or just more annoyingly trendy, overly Diablospeak wrapped around a not-so-great attempt to deconstruct the horror genre?
Weigh in, film freaks.
DP/30 – Terry Gilliam On The Imaginarium Of Dr. Parnassus
Sunday, September 27th, 2009The full interview…

The teaser…
CineVegas Craps Out
Saturday, September 26th, 2009The climate for film festivals is even harsher than the climate for studios and indies. The first major fest to now announce a complete wipe-out is CineVegas, a festival that quickly became a favorite with journalists, boasting happy Vegas accommodations and some tiny finds along the way.
IndieWIRE breaks the news, but offers no real answers as to why the plug got pulled. “Quality” is a bullshit answer, with due respect to all.
My bet would be that they either lost The Palms as the central sponsor or the Brenden Theaters multiplex (inside The Palms), where the festival was held… or both. Vegas is hurting. And all things considered, CineVegas probably never earned the casino hotel a single room night sold.
The Palms is all about showy promotion, but the tipping point for CineVegas was 2007′s premiere of Ocean’s 13. Brad, Matt, and Don walked the red carpet.
In 2008… The Rocker.
2009… St John of Las Vegas.
Game over.
Studios are not spending on festivals the way they used to. Vegas casinos can get celebrities on their carpets for less. And CineVegas never emerged as a sales fest or even a festival that could draw media together – which it did – to get behind a film that would go on to have even minor commercial success.
The effort of the entire team is to be respected. Dennis Hopper could not have been a more willing and available advocate. But festivals that survive this economy will have to have a purpose clear enough to draw sponsors. Fewer days, fewer press events, less money spent on traveling talent… it’s already started, but it’s only going to get worse from here.
Yes, I hope there is a new CineVegas resurrected in the years to come. It was not a cynical effort by those who ran the event. Not at all. But if and when it comes back, expect it to do even more to service its sponsors in a city that is built on hype.
Solipsism: A Love Story
Saturday, September 26th, 2009The defining moment of Capitalism: A Love Story, for me, so far, came last night, listening to Bill Maher slather Moore’s bullocks with the slimy slick saliva of his tongue for minutes… only to gently explain after the licking was done, why the movie’s conceit really makes no sense. Seriously… Maher has a future doing movie quotes for Rolling Stone.
But the sad part of this exchange was watching Moore’s eyes… I think he knows that his latest film is coming up short. He looked sad, not enraged. He was saying all the words that he must as One Of The Greatest Salesmen On The Planet. But he is sending a movie out into the world that is right out of Animal House, when Belushi’s Bluto gives his “Nothing is over until we decide it is!” speech and no one follows him.
“What the fuck happened to the America I used to know?,” Moore must be wondering. But the question America may be wondering is, “Where is the Michael Moore we used to know?”
The answer is also in that same scene in Animal House. Bluto is pure Id in that film. But after being beaten down, the Deltas won’t follow pure Id anymore. It’s when Otter acts as The Ego, putting Bluto’s unstructured rant into a perspective that his frat brothers can connect to (even if he is still being a bit silly.)
The genius of Moore has been that he is Id and Ego in one as a filmmaker. And this film, like much of Sicko, is all super-ego. We still see that fun, thoughtful maniac in there… glimpses of the Id and Ego. But mostly, he wants to be a moralizing Super-Ego these days. And part of that, I would suggest, is because he is making a movie that is dealing with issues too fresh for him to get perspective on, much less give us perspective on.
Last night, on Maher, he talked about wanting to make a movie that was so outrageously honest that no studio would ever fund another one of his movies. Epic Fail, Mike. There is not a single thing exposed in the body of Capitalism: A Love Story that Jon Stewart, Bill Maher, David Letterman, and even Jay Leno haven’t already mocked… and mocked in a more funny way. No one needed a film to tell us that bailing out banks sucks and that people being thrown out of their houses – that they took insane loans on, of their own greedy accord, btw – at the same time feels like a shot in the gut. America gets it.
You used to convert. Now all you seem to want to do is to preach to the converted.
I truly love your work and believe in your gift, Michael Moore. But you need to get further out ahead of the news cycle or you become just another f-ing talking head for the liberals instead of the idiots of Fox News who do the same crap on the other side.
Friday Estimates by Klady – Meatballs With A Side Of Surrogates
Saturday, September 26th, 2009
Fugly.
No one can hide behind September this week. Just look at this weekend as it rolled out last year…
Eagle Eye - $9.8m Fri – $29.2m
Nights in Rodanthe – $4.7m Fri – $13.4m
Fireproof -$2.3m – $6.8m
Miracle at St. Anna -$967k – $3.5m
Choke – $477k – $1.3m
Those were the five newbies. $18.2m in new product on Friday. $54.2m over 3 days.
The top three new movies this year this weekend are slightly ahead of Eagle Eye‘s opening Friday alone.
Proud moments.
Love the folks at MGM… but with nothing to sell but Fame for month after month after month, it looks like they’ll be lucky to get a $10m opening out of it.
Surrogates is like the post-Avatar knock-off that came out months before Avatar instead of months after. But it has Bruce Willis being grizzled, which there is still an audience for. But the outdoor campaign looked like vodka ads… literally… like a recent vodka campaign mixed with Calvin Klein. And the result is better than Hostage or Perfect Stranger or 16 Blocks…. but not by much.
And the sickest part of this weekend… it could actually provide cover for more bloodshed at both MGM and Disney next week.
The story in limited releases is Capitalism: A Love Story, which is looking at a $45k-ish per screen over the 3-day weekend. Sicko did $69k on 1 screen in its first weekend. F9/11 did $39k per screen on 2 on a Wednesday and a Thursday before going to 868 screens on that first Friday (where it did $28k per-screen).
In other words… this number will be inconclusive… in Michael Moore dollars. Any other doc would be dancing a jig just grossing over $100k in a weekend, much less in the limited before going wide.
The Truth, The Truth, The Truth Is On Fire
Saturday, September 26th, 2009The line between personality and news gets blurrier everyday and some days, my ability to just look away without public comment is overwhelmed by the sick feeling in my stomach that comes from falsehoods being consumed and repeated across the media spectrum because these falsehoods are designed to be eye-grabbing and not because the public author of them has given it a single thought greater than the fact that they could gather some attention.
I get angry.
And I get frustrated.
I get as frustrated with the public – some of whom are professional journalists – as I do with the self-aggrandizing sources of this kind of “news” because all that is require to change the dynamic is, in the case of journalists, the tiniest amount of attention to detail and history. And yet this seems to be beyond the level of interest in doing the job these days.
And I completely understand that when these moments of bubbling over come up, it can read like some sort of personal issue. It doesn’t help that people like Patrick Goldstein now use major dying outlets like the LA Times to go little past the personal these days.
Anyway…
Today’s drama starts, as it often does, with Nikki Finke.
Apparently, everyone – starting with Nikki – has quickly forgotten that the same person who got it dead wrong in July when she was being fed spin by Harry Sloan’s operatives that everything at MGM was looking up in back-to-back EXCLUSIVEs – “GOOD NEWS FOR MGM: Audit Will Show Struggling Studio Is A “Going Concern” and “TOLDJA! MGM Audit Shows Full Compliance With All Debt Covenants; EXCLUSIVE UPDATE: Studio Library Valued At $5.5B” – is now the person they are quoting as gospel as she finally is being fed the “news” that everyone who was actually seriously considering what was happening at MGM knew was inevitable from the time Harry Sloan pulled the already flailing situation away from Sony in the arrogant believe that he could rebuild a dying library valuation into an empire again.
The new EXCLUSIVE…”EXCLUSIVE DETAILS: MGM Makes Phone Plea To Bondholders To Stay Alive; Both ‘Hobbit’ And James Bond In Peril; Bondholders Tell Studio To Go Bankrupt; MGM Calls That Worst Possible Outcome”
And now, of course, we have media all over the place jumping on the Big Lie of the headline… that MGM’s fate will define the fate of these two partnered projects.
Anyone with a brain and any sense of the players would instantly understand that neither Barbara Broccoli and Warner Bros are going to allow their franchises to be derailed by the situation at MGM. And they don’t have to. There is money available for both projects to move forward. And even if MGM went bankrupt, no bankruptcy judge on the planet would stop significant incoming revenue -especially without a cash layout – to be created and absorbed into the company on the inflated notion by whomever is selling this shite to Nikki that maintaining distribution and a cash position in these films in spite of not being able to move forward because of a lack of cash in the company is in the interest of the company.
This is not complex.
And frankly, it is not just Nikki’s fault for being the George W Bush is a town full of Dick Cheneys, never really understanding the agenda, but selling it with all her tiny heart and soul.
When someone writes, “Some say the call lasted 6 1/2 hours. Others said it lasted 2 1/2 hours with lenders, and then the lenders themselves had a conference call that lasted another 2 hours,” that person is openly acknowledging that they don’t know what actually happened and that there are wildly varying versions of the tale being told. This opening screams, “Take all of this with a grain of salt.” But this is the Nikki-ism of it… she then boils it down to a screaming headline that is neither smart nor accurate, taking full advantage of peoples’ disinterest in actually reading the sometimes obvious subtext of her work.
People don’t want to think too hard and Nikki doesn’t want to do the journalistic job of thinking it out for them. The #1 goal is promoting Nikki, not seeking truth.
And in the current media universe, everything is a writeover waiting to happen. There is no memory. Getting it dead wrong today is not big deal so long as you get it dead wrong tomorrow.
Trailer: The Book of Eli
Saturday, September 26th, 2009Dp/30 State Of The Union – Sony Pictures Classics
Friday, September 25th, 2009
The Sneak Peek is here…
Sony Pictures Classics co-presidents Michael Barker & Tom Bernard sat down for a 30 minute discussion about where things stand in the business of being independent.
We Live in Public
Friday, September 25th, 2009
What follows is an extremely brief history of the Internet.
Once upon a time in America, computers couldn’t talk to each other, instantly or otherwise. Then, they could.
Once upon a time in America, e-mail didn’t exist. Then, it did.
Once upon a time in America, commercial use of the Internet was forbidden. Then, it wasn’t.
Once upon a time in America, communication along the Internet was limited to researchers, scientists, engineers and the military. Then, it wasn’t.
Once upon a time in America, common folk spoke to each in person, by phone, walkie-talkies, Dixie Cups attached by string or not at all. Then, they discovered the Internet and everything else was rendered obsolete.
That, in a nutshell, is all one needs to understand about the Internet to enjoy Ondi Timoner’s fascinating, if occasionally frightening documentary, We Live in Public. It’s also good to remember that the people you’ll meet in the film have forgotten more about computers than you’ll ever know, so sit back, relax and follow Timoner back to those thrilling days of yesteryear, before the dot com boom went bust and geeks like Josh Harris ruled.
Harris wasn’t there at the beginning, in the 1960s, when computers began networking with each other, and engineers and professors kept news of their new plaything close to the vest. He entered the realm in 1985, as senior Videotex analyst for International Data Corp. A year later, he founded the New York-based online research firm, Jupiter Communications, which he sold years later for about $80 million, and, in the mid-’90s, the interactive streaming-video enterprise, Pseudo Programs Inc. That artistic endeavor would lead to Pseudo.com and group-living experiments, “Quiet” and “We Live in Public.”
By 2001, after pissing away millions of dollars in his own money – and that of unsuspecting investors – on parties, performance-art events and jobs for friends and hot babes, Harris was bankrupt.
As such, the publicity for We Live in Public declares, Harris was “the greatest Internet pioneer you’ve never heard of … an artist, futurist and visionary.” It might have added megalomaniac, poser, provocateur, rip-off artist, total dick and a nerd’s nerd, at a time when that really meant something.
Let’s start with him being a “total dick”: the first thing we see Harris doing in We Live in Public is delivering a farewell message to his mother, who’s on her death bed, as it was posted on MySpace. In it, he lectures the poor woman on how such good-byes soon will be all the rage among the Internet crowd. Then, Harris asked his mother to say, “Hi,” to all of their relatives on the “other side.”
Most of the footage used to create We Live in Public was shot nearly a decade ago when the so-called “Warhol of Web TV” was riding high with Pseudo Programs Inc. and the fledgling Internet television network, Pseudo.com. Timoner was invited to Silicon Alley to interview some of the talent behind Pseudo and to chronicle “Quiet,” an event in which 100 people agreed to live their lives before his cameras in an underground bunker for 30 days.
After submitting to an exhaustive questioning by Harris’ “neo-fascist” thought-police, the participants lived in a honeycomb structure, not unlike the “Hollywood Squares” set. All of the compact housing units were equipped with a camera, as was nearly every other nook, cranny and shower stall. The group performed regular chores, ate, drank, snorted coke, fornicated and staged events for their own amusement and that of viewers. More than anything else, though, they partied like it was 1999 – which it was — and Harris was sitting in on guitars and vocals for Prince.
Police shut down “Quiet” On New Year’s Day, after getting reports of automatic-weapon fire in the bunker. Considering the direction Harris was steering the debauched geeks, Timoner believes something violent might otherwise have occurred, and the puppet master wouldn’t have objected one bit.
The filmmaker also would be on hand to witness the experiment that ultimately led Harris to a mental breakdown and his girlfriend to abandon him. For six months, he and video artist Tanya Corrin would have every hour of their lives scrutinized by friends and strangers, alike, on line. They were willing not only to share conversations and mundane activities with viewers, but also their arguments, bowel movements and Harris’ attempts, at least, to conceive a child. It ended prematurely, when Corrin stormed out of the loft (“I’m not a porn star!”), causing Timoner to put the footage on a shelf.
Meanwhile, the Internet evolved and prospered without Harris, as did the filmmaker.
“Two years ago, I looked around and realized that what I had documented back then was a physical metaphor of how people would react to the Internet, which Josh predicted would eventually take over our time,” said Timoner, who, in 2004, released the Sundance rock-doc sensation, DiG! “I finally understood what all of his work was about. I saw that what seemed nonsensical at the time was part of a much bigger picture, which needed to be communicated to the world.”
She also was inspired by the realization that nearly all of her friends and acquaintances were voluntarily living out parts of their own lives in public, via social networks. It was an obsession that brought her back to the “ugly feelings I had in the bunker.”
One thing Harris understood, perhaps better than anyone else in the infancy of broadband communication, was that “in the future, it wouldn’t be enough to be famous for 15 minutes in a lifetime. People will want to be famous for 15 minutes every day.”
Timoner said she was shocked to see people update their Facebook pages and Twitter their tweets every chance they got, including during conversations and while driving. The dramatic rise in popularity of reality-TV shows also revealed a paradigm shift in attitudes toward privacy and self-esteem.
“Today, contestants on game shows will swim through worms just to be seen on television,” she quipped. “Ironically, when Josh launched his Internet television network, almost no one outside the studio had the broadband capability to watch it. Since then, the Internet has experienced exponential growth and there hasn’t been time to consider the ramifications.
“Apparently, we can’t stand the thought of being alone for any period of time … we’re herding ourselves into these little boxes, which we can decorate … but they’re still cages. The Internet may be the greatest technological innovation in our lifetime — when it comes to communication and knowledge, anyway — but it has a dark side, and I’ve seen it.”
Even if Harris was every bit the visionary he and Timoner think he was, it may have happened by accident and the virtue of having more money than sense. While providing fertile ground for other people’s creativity, he was also was a sucker for pop cultural iconography and a bit of a plagiarist.
The pornography industry began charging consumers for the privilege of watching actors live their lives on the Internet well before the “Quiet” experiment, which enjoyed the singular distinction of being embraced by the art crowd in Lower Manhattan. The novelty of Voyeur Dorm and other sites eventually wore off, however, to be replaced by gonzo and fetish sites.
The number of people supposedly obsessed with Facebook, MySpace, Twitter and other social sites likely is exaggerated, as well. What began as a medium for young people to share ideas and gossip has been co-opted by corporations, Boomer parents, entertainment-industry publicists, infomercials and bored office workers. It’s to bored web surfers, today, what Solitaire was to the same people two decades ago.
Big Brother’s influence also has cast a shadow on Internet communication. Censors, spies and hackers hover over the Web like so many vultures in search of rotting road kill, and a war is raging between predatory capitalists – the same content providers who made their fortunes in mainstream-media outlets – and those who embrace the long-held belief, “Information wants to be free.”
Today’s hits are tomorrow’s memories. America Online, once considered to be the future of Internet commerce and communication, has been abandoned by subscribers angered by the censors who monitor chat rooms, stale news reports and adherence to mainstream values. YouTube is a wonderful medium, but it, too, could succumb to a freer and more open forum. There’s nearly as much free pornography available on the Internet, today, as that on pay sites.
The release of We Live in Public has raised long-dormant debate over Harris’ true contributions to the Internet. No one doubts his generosity, while with Pseudo, but was he leading the artistic community over a precipice, merely in a demonstration of unrestraine d ego? If he truly were such a genius, why hasn’t he been able to devise something else that’s new and amazing … if not for artistic expression, then, profits.
Perhaps, it’s because: once a geek, always a geek. After all, how much credence should be given to anyone – filthy rich, bankrupt or both – who believed he was making a profound statement by appearing in public in clown make-up, or who considered Gilligan’s Islandto be the crowning achievement in western culture?
“He was raised on the show and wanted to be (executive producer) Sherwood Schwartz,” Timoner pointed out. “When I asked him if he wanted to attend the premiere of this film, he said, ‘Sure, I’m ready for the performance.’ He didn’t see it as being his life story.”
In the period between “Quiet” and the Sundance debut of We Live in Public, Harris lived a reclusive existence at his commercial apple orchard in Upstate New York, before serving as CEO of Operator Exchange Corp. – its Operator 11 was intended to be a “live version of MySpace” — and the African Entertainment Network, based in Ethiopia.
Timoner allowed that Harris didn’t return to Africa after attending this year’s Sundance festival, where the film brought the filmmaker her second top documentary prize. Instead, he began playing poker to raise money for his next incarnation.
She’s moved on to a documentary on global warming, traveling to coastal cities to discover what steps are being taken to avoid being submerged. Judging from the We Live in Public website, however, Timoner has overcome her trepidations about being attached too tightly to the Internet. Once there, browsers are encouraged to follow the movie on nine different services, link to all sorts of media sites and download a widget for use on their own pages.
- Gary Dretzka
September 25, 2009












