Archive for April, 2009
Hot Docs 16 opens tonight in Toronto
Thursday, April 30th, 2009The sixteenth edition of HotDocs, the terrific Toronto documentary event, opens with Jennifer Baichwal‘s Act of God. [Baichwal, after the jump.] “Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival,” to use its full name, programs over 170 films from 39 countries. Sidebars include Spotlight on the NFB at 70 and Made In South Korea programs; retrospectives of work by Torontonian filmmaker Ron Mann and 2009 Outstanding Achievement Award recipient Alanis Obomsawin. Here’s the Hot Docs Daily. For the third year, I’ll be observing and reporting from the fest, starting on Tuesday and running through the end. Monday, I’ll have a preview of some movies I’ve seen and others I’m anticipating. Expect photographs and video. [View from the Roof Lounge at the Park Hyatt, a popular sunset destination for certain repasts: gin martinis are popular.]
Soderbergh on film crickets
Thursday, April 30th, 2009Todd Hill of Staten Island Advance blogs part of an interview with Steven Soderbergh, where he talks about movie reviews. “I just don’t read them. It’s just not something that helps me at that point. First of all, I’m usually already two movies away from what they’re looking at. They have a role, they just don’t really have a role for me. I’m aware of the general critical response to
something as it affects the business life of the film. If you make a film that’s kind of a specialty film and you get trashed by everyone you’re going to have a tough time trying to break through. It’s like getting hit by a car and six months later somebody going, ‘You shouldn’t have stepped in front of that car.’ Yeah, okay. Wish you had been there. I have nothing to say in response. The film is what it is… I’m sure we all have complex feelings about the Internet. On the one hand, in theory, if you write about movies you can go on the Internet and write a 5,000-word piece on something if you’re so moved. The question is whether anybody will get to word 500 before they go, ‘Oh Jesus, just tell me how many stars.’ Culturally, that kind of question of whether there is a place for that kind of ruminative, complex criticism, that’s an open question, and not just for cinema, for everything.”
BYOB – Travellin' North
Thursday, April 30th, 2009Driving up to San Francisco today for the SF International, America’s eldest film fest with some of America’s smartest and ambitious fest programming.
You have the con’…
Roger and Me
Thursday, April 30th, 2009When I was a little girl growing up in Oklahoma City, I was a little geek who read books voraciously and wrote incessantly. I told stories to myself while walking to school to pass the time. I scribbled stories during class, hiding a notebook inside my textbook so my teachers wouldn’t know what I was doing. And I also, thanks in large part to my grandmother and Roger Ebert, came to love the storytelling of movies.
Read the rest of this column …
Spring showers bring spring flowers
Thursday, April 30th, 2009DP/30 – Il Divo writer/director Paolo Sorrentino
Wednesday, April 29th, 2009
Paolo Sorrentino biopic about Italian Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti is not like any bio-pic you’ve ever seen… part Scorsese, part Oliver Stone, and all Sorrentino. I had a chance to sit down with the writer/director (and his off-screen interpreter) in Los Angeles recently.
The video interview is after the jump… and the DP/30 home page is here and the podcast link can be found here.
Nickelodeon & The Last Picture Show
Wednesday, April 29th, 2009![]() |
Peter Bogdanovich’s paean to the early days of moviemaking, Nickelodeon, has been released as a 2-Disc Double Feature Director’s Choice title by Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, Nickelodeon / The Last Picture Show. Bogdanovich’s The Last Picture Show was available previously as a Special Edition. Each film is presented on a separate platter and is in letterboxed format only, with an aspect ratio of about 1.85:1 and an accommodation for enhanced 16:9 playback. Both presentations are ‘Director’s Cut’ versions, although Nickelodeon is presented in both its original theatrical format and Bogdanovich’s alternate format. The 1971 theatrical version of The Last Picture Show has never been released on DVD.
For the 1976 Nickelodeon, Bogdanovich has, with some care, removed the color from the image, to present it as a black-and-white film, presumably in honor of the era it is depicting (although he didn’t ‘square’ the image to 1.33:1, and the film was shot with modern wide angle lenses). The Director’s Cut runs 125 minutes while the theatrical version runs 122 minutes, adding more depth to the characters and expanding the clips from Birth of a Nation that appear in the movie’s climax.
Now, I gave Bogdanovich’s black-and-white version every chance to succeed. Having not seen the movie in three decades, I watched the black-and-white version first and then waited a full week before putting on the color version. It is clear that Bogdanovich hasn’t just hit a button on some video processor. The contrasts and shadows are often carefully graded. But it just doesn’t work. The best thing about the film is Laszlo Kovacs’ lovely, deliberately subdued color cinematography and the film’s equally beautiful production design. Without having that to soften the blow, the film’s glaring flaws and inconsistent tone are magnified all the more. It is telling that even the clips of Birth of a Nation have more of an impact in the color version, where they are tinted, than in the black-and-white version, where they are uniformly black-and-white. (One of the more clever inspirations in the script was to have Burt Reynolds’ character appear in a stage version of The Klansman at the movie’s beginning, so that Nation’s racism could be safely ignored at the end.)
Screenwriters Bogdanovich and W.D. Richter attempted to draw from all of the ‘good old days’ tales they had heard sitting at the knees of the great old time directors, and since the movie is a comedy, they also tried to incorporate classic slapstick gags. They forgot, however, to put in a story. Ryan O’Neal stars as a struggling lawyer who backs into the profession, and Reynolds is a roustabout that he turns into a star. Jane Hitchcock is an actress that they both fall for, although O’Neal’s character never really does much about it (his character is made a bit darker in the Director’s Cut, explaining some reactions from other characters that are mystifying if you don’t read between the lines in the theatrical version). John Ritter, Tatum O’Neal, Brian Keith, and Stella Stevens co-star. In 1976, without the ready availability of classic movies in every library, people didn’t know as much about the history of moviemaking as they do now, and it may have been that Bogdanovich simply thought he was doing enough by getting some of the basics down and making it entertaining, but the movie ought to have been jammed a great deal more with gags, history or what have you. The skills he had demonstrated in earlier films, both in efficient storytelling and in executing screwball comedy, completely desert him. There are a few cute moments, some haunting images (especially the final metaphor-for-movies-and-life shot of men dressed as soldiers marching in a circle so a camera can film them in an endless straight line), and attractive stars, but it can’t shake the appearance that it is a concoction dreamed up by enthusiastic movie geeks who had too much cash to burn.
The monophonic sound is okay. The theatrical version has an alternate French audio track and both versions have optional English and French subtitles. Bogdanovich supplies a commentary track over the Director’s Cut, identifying each allusion, discussing the compromises he had to make during the production, recalling what it was like to work with the cast and crew, and admitting that even with the Director’s Cut, which he thinks is better than the color film, there are still significant tonal problems and other flaws.
Occasional speckles that appear on the separate DVD release of The Last Picture Showhave been removed on the Double Feature presentation, but otherwise the black-and-white image transfer sill looks a little too soft and could use a full-fledged remastering. Even under those conditions, however, the 1971 film remains a highly compelling drama about a year in the lives of several teenagers and grownups living in a half-empty, flat Texas town. Timothy Bottoms stars as a graduating senior who ends up having an affair with his coach’s wife, played by Cloris Leachman (who won a Supporting Oscar). Jeff Bridges and Cybill Shepherd play another couple, and Ben Johnson (who won the other Supporting Oscar) is the owner of the town’s pool hall. The 126-minute director’s cut brings back sequences that Bogdanovich was pressured to drop to keep the film’s running time under two hours, and enriches the story in a satisfying manner.
It was once something of a mystery as to why this film is so much better than any other Bogdanovich film, but listening to his commentary, which is new, and to the excellent 65-minute retrospective documentary, which also appeared on the earlier DVD release, it becomes much clearer. For one thing, he was working off of a Larry McMurtry novel instead of composing an original script, so the emotional wealth and backgrounds of the characters were already thoroughly established. But he was also chomping at the bit to make a major film. He’d done Targets, but that was a somewhat larkish project, based in part upon the limited availability of its star. For Last Picture Show, he went all out. He rehearsed extensively, had every shot and every scene visualized in his head, and it all came together just as he’d planned it. He describes these efforts in his commentary. “This next scene, which develops into a fight with Jeff and Tim, this was all shot in forty-five different set-ups, and they were planned rather carefully, and the actors and I rehearsed the scene quite a bit. I remember rehearsing that previous weekend, and I told them exactly where the cuts were going to be. I actually planned it while we were rehearsing it, so that they knew how far it would go without a cut and where the cuts would be. It was a complicated scene and we had to do it in one day, so we were very prepared. Every single shot, as you see it in the picture, is exactly the way it was shot. We did it in sequence, shot by shot.” He had a few more hits afterwards, but he probably never had the same ‘fire’ in his belly, and by Nickelodeon, it is obvious that to a certain extent, he’s winging it.
The monophonic sound is clear. There is an alternate French track and optional English and French subtitles. In addition to the documentary, the original DVD release has text profiles of Bogdanovich and the cast, a trailer, and a 6-minute promotional featurette created for the film’s first theatrical re-release. The Double Feature release includes all of those special features (except for the text profiles) and also has a 13-minute retrospective interview with Bogdanovich. The essential information is covered in the longer documentary, but the commentary and the interview add worthwhile details.
Douglas Pratt’s DVD-Laser Disc Newsletter is published monthly.
For a free sample, call (516)594-9304 or go to his website at www.DVDLaser.com
Roger and Me
Wednesday, April 29th, 2009
When I was a little girl growing up in Oklahoma City, I was a little geek who read books voraciously and wrote incessantly. I told stories to myself while walking to school to pass the time. I scribbled stories during class, hiding a notebook inside my textbook so my teachers wouldn’t know what I was doing. And I also, thanks in large part to my grandmother and Roger Ebert, came to love the storytelling of movies.
I spent the night at my grandmother’s house frequently during my childhood, and one of the shows my grandmother and great-grandmother enjoyed watching was a little show on PBS called Sneak Previews, with Gene Siskel and Roger Ebert. My grandmother was a practical woman, and she liked that they looked like guys she might see at church or the grocery store, not like fancy movie stars. She liked that they talked about movies in a way she could relate to, and most of all, she liked it when Siskel and Ebert argued.
She and my great-grandmother would drink a martini or a glass of red wine or two while watching the show, and when Ebert would get the best of Siskel in an argument, my great-grandmother would hoot, “Hah! The one with the glasses really told the skinny one off that time!” Neither of them could keep straight who was Siskel and who was Ebert, but they always thought “the one with the glasses” was funny, and they only agreed with Siskel when he agreed with Ebert. They agreed with each other that Roger wore his hair too long and that he should cut it shorter or slick it back with some nice pomade. They also thought my uncle, the Catholic priest, wore his hair too long, but when they realized my uncle and Roger had the same haircut, they decided through a conversation that lasted through an entire episode of the show that the haircut was tolerable, since that seemed to be the look that was fashionable. After all, the-one-with-the-glasses had his own TV show with that haircut, so it must be okay.
I wrote from the time I could write, little stories and poems, and later longer stories and essays and such. I always wanted to be a writer, and my grandmother encouraged me in this. We’d lie in her bed late at night before she fell asleep, and she’d have me “review” whatever movie I’d seen lately, or a book I was reading. When I was a bit older, maybe 12 or so, I told her shyly that when I grew up, I’d like to write, and maybe I’d like to write about movies. I was really asking her whether she thought I wrote well enough to have a dream like that, of course, and whether it would ever be possible to do such a thing as have a job where you got to write about movies.
My family were practical people, you see, folks who valued hard work; grown-ups had bills to pay, and responsibilities, and it didn’t much matter if you liked what you did to make your paycheck, so long as you earned it. Work wasn’t about pleasure, it was work, and you did it because you had to, not because you enjoyed it. While I’d harbored secret dreams that maybe as a grownup, I might be able to have a job that would pay enough to be “responsible” while also being something I actually liked doing, I wasn’t entirely sure this was possible for ordinary people. So it was with some trepidation that I confessed to my grandmother that I dreamed of being a writer who wrote about movies, half afraid she might say that it just wasn’t a practical idea, and that I should follow the path that she, my mother and my aunt had taken of getting a nice, stable secretarial job for the State.
Instead, she told me, “Well, baby, I guess if that Siskel and Ebert can do it, you can do it, too.”
But I didn’t, for a long time. Life got in the way and motherhood came along with its inherent responsibilities to be dealt with. I majored in journalism, but switched to education with just six hours left to complete in my journalism studies because teaching was a more practical field. Later, I switched to the tech industry where the money was good, even if the work wasn’t always fulfilling. I still wrote, but my writing got shoved into the nooks and crannies of a life that seemed to get busier and busier, and while a little flicker of the dream to write still burned, for a while it was eclipsed by more practical matters.
Then I took some time off from working to stay home with my kids — it’s hard to think about working when you’ve got four kids aged six and under — and somewhere around the third year of that, I started to think about what might be around the next bend. I was at a crossroads in my life, one of those moments when the choice you make will define things for a long time to come. A return to tech beckoned on one side, with all its allure of a big salary, job security, and benefits. On the other side, the possibility of pursuing a long-dormant dream stood by, watching and waiting to see which path I’d choose.
Then I heard that a blog called Cinematical was looking to hire a writer, and suddenly the childhood dream seemed a possibility. And I thought about Roger Ebert, and how he probably didn’t look at his choice of career with regret for not following his dream, and I decided I didn’t want that regret either. So I took a deep breath and took the path of insecurity and uncertainty, to see where it would take me. And perhaps a year or so after I started writing about film, when I was wondering whether I’d made the right choice or if I should get back into tech, it was Roger Ebert who — without him knowing the impact he had — played a role in keeping me on my path.
At Sundance 2006, I saw Roger around the fest (you always knew when he was coming by the heads turning and the sudden buzzing of whispered voices: “Look! It’s Ebert!”). Of course, I was too shy to approach him. I’d seen Ramin Bahrani‘s Man Push Cart at Sundance and loved it, and when I saw Roger’s positive review in his closing write-up of Sundance, I worked up the courage to email him to tell him how much I enjoyed his review and how much I loved the film myself. I read Roger’s reviews regularly, of course, but I’d never commented or emailed, and it certainly never occurred to me that he might know who I was. When I got a reply, I expected an automated response message of the “Thank you for emailing Roger Ebert. Mr. Ebert reads all his mail, but cannot personally respond to every one …” type. So when I opened that email and found a lovely personal response, I was surprised, but then I got to bottom of the email and saw the three words he’d written there.
“Love your work.”
Love my … work? Roger Ebert, childhood television companion of so many nights at my grandmother’s house, the man who taught me to love movies, loved my work?
Well, hell, I sure couldn’t quit after that.
Roger invited me that year to his Overlooked Film Festival, but I wasn’t able to attend due to the impending birth of my grandson the same weekend. I did go the next year and ever since, and hopefully I’ll be there every year for as long as the festival runs. And in between, even through his illness and long rehabilitation, he’s offered me kind words of encouragement, or gentle ribbing, or funny quips along the way. He’s been a mentor not only for my writing, but about how to live your life with dignity and courage, and he and his lovely wife Chaz have become friends I treasure. And he’s been responsible, in more ways than he knows, for me having an utterly non-practical career that I love.
Ebertfest isn’t just a film festival, it’s a family — a family of filmmakers, film critics and film lovers who all come together to celebrate the movies in a unique communion of love for cinema, infused in its very soul by the warmth and generosity of Roger Ebert. The only thing that comes close to Ebertfest is Telluride, but Ebertfest is smaller, more intimate, and somehow more personal to the people fortunate enough to experience it. At other festivals, film journalists interview filmmakers — under the gun of a 10 or 15 minute time slot, handlers hovering, and talent who’ve been sitting in a room answering variations of the same questions all day long. At Ebertfest, film journalists, filmmakers and festival passholders mix and mingle freely, and the conversations flow like fine wine.
At Ebertfest, all the guests are housed in the same place, the Illini Union hotel. We meet in the morning grabbing a coffee in the Student Union, listen to each other’s panels, watch films together in the beautiful Virginia Theater, chat in between films over more coffee on the back patio of the nearby coffeeshop, and converse over lovely meals and wine over dinner in the VIP Green Room.
We talk about the films, of course, but we also talk about our lives and share personal stories; while I might learn more about the production specifics of a given film in a regular fest interview, at Ebertfest I might hear a story about a director’s childhood, or what they did on their last vacation, or what book they’ve been reading. It’s like going off to a weekend camp for film geeks, where everyone bonds over metaphorical marshmallows around the campfire, and by the end of the weekend, everyone’s hugging and sad that it’s over, and promises to keep in touch until next year. And most of the time, we do.
Friendships form at Ebertfest, and it’s not just the love of the movies that does it, it’s the magical, almost spiritual atmosphere of the fest, and the deliberate way in which Roger structured it to bring filmmakers and film journalists together in this unique way that makes it different from every other fest. It’s about the love of movies, but it’s also about the community that forms there for a few days every April. I travel back to Urbana each year not hoping to meet a particular filmmaker, but knowing that I will have the opportunity to sit around those round tables over dinner with the most extraordinary combination of film lovers you could ever hope to share a meal with. And at some point during the meal, Roger will scoot into an empty chair at our table and join the conversation with his notebook in hand, always with a witty remark at the ready. Ebertfest is nirvana, and it’s because of Roger that it is what it is.
I’ve never told Roger the story of how he touched my life for so long. Perhaps I was saving it for some future day when I’d finally complete the brilliant screenplay I’m working on, make the film I dream of making in the way in which I dream of making it, and hear from Roger that he enjoyed my film so much he wants to program it in his own film festival. And then I’d introduce the film by telling this story, and it would be a lovely thing. But that day may or may not ever come, so I decided to tell this story here, after a joyous weekend of fest dispatches written at 2AM or so after long days and nights of movie-watching and chatting and socializing.
I’ll be back at Ebertfest next year, for the love of movies, but more for the love of the festival itself, and the love Roger shares with his hometown every April. Maybe we’ll see you there, too.
Review: Wolverine
Wednesday, April 29th, 2009X-Men Origins: Wolverine is no The Dark Knight. Nor is it Batman Begins or Spider-Man or the first, groundbreaking X-Men or Burton
Another Silly Stat From The Ticket Salesmen
Wednesday, April 29th, 2009Fandango - “WOLVERINE opens tomorrow night at midnight, and it appears that Hugh Jackman
An account of being roughed up after a film festival in Greece
Wednesday, April 29th, 2009
FACE DOWN ON THE TABLE IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM, I hold stock-still as the young doctor with the needle poised to pierce my scalp deadpans, “How are you enjoying our Greek hospitality?” Two female doctors in training, tall, longhaired brunettes, giggle at his banter between instructions in their language: he’s fascinated that I’m calm after being attacked by a mob. “So you’re a photojournalist?” “Po-po journalist, it seems,” I joke, using slang that’s an all purpose “oh-oh.” The women giggle. “I don’t get it,” he says, as he pulls thread through my lacerated skin.
It’s been a little more than a month since that Sunday night and most aches have subsided. My insurance covered the CAT scan and other tests once I was back in the States, assuring nothing might be permanently awry. Cumulatively, I’ve spent almost six months of my life in the north of Greece but this is the first time I’ve been taken for an anarchist infiltrator and roughed up by a gang of nationalists. [Machine translation]
Thessaloniki is a city of just over a million. Street protests are common, prevalent, even. One cloudy afternoon a couple of years ago, I asked a cop in knee-high black boots standing beside his motorcycle as a main artery was filled with red flags of a communist youth party and black flags of some anarchist faction, what’s this one about? “Just another regularly scheduled spontaneous demonstration,” he answered.
That Sunday was the last of ten days of the eleventh Thessaloniki International Documentary Festival. I had been watching films and talking to directors and photographers and programmers for a print piece for Filmmaker magazine. The usual suspects: homelessness, globalization, genocide. Earlier, I’d had conversations with a young Rwandan director who made one of several films about that last topic as part of a section of films made specifically by African directors. I had a drink with a few filmmakers and colleagues and chose to stop by a friends’ apartment rather than ending the event on the bloody note of his film: he is a good storyteller and I’d gotten more than the gist of the horror, physical and moral, of that tragedy.
Along the eight blocks to the apartment, a square bristles with a crowd of middle-aged men listening to an energetic older man. A rank of blinding bright white lights stands between the speaker and the Byzantine edifice behind him. This is the square of Agia Sofia, the “Church of the Holy Wisdom.” It’s a neighborhood I know well; I feel safe. The words of his urgent peroration that I understand are mostly along the lines of “homeland” and “patriotism.” Riot police stand at the perimeter of the gathering. I have my DSLR camera with me, walk past without even framing a picture. I move along. “Homeland.” “Patriotism.”

Journalists watch, movie reviewers watch, photographers watch, used to seeing. Seeing without being seen, as well. I was about to get a simple lesson in observation. The speaker’s voice resounds through the shutters of the flat several blocks away. “Homeland. “Patriotism.” I take the same route half-an-hour later, 9:15, after dark. Observing, I reach toward my unzipped camera bag, more to protect its contents than to take out any equipment. Three, then four middle-aged men are abruptly in my face shouting in Greek, “Who are you?” “Who sent you?” “What are you doing?” I’m surrounded. I move to protect my bag as punches fly and fall.
Sloppy punches and kicks from a dozen men in a mob scrum are always to be preferred over two guys in an alley. If you get dragged free soon enough, it’s more roughing up than being beaten stupid. Still, there’s blood. The velocity of the event? Under two minutes, I would guess.

I was told later the men who kicked, swung, slapped, as I crouched on the ground to protect my face, might have taken me for “an anarchist infiltrator.” Fast, furious. Less than two minutes and about a pint of blood later, soaking my hair and cascading down the back of my jacket, police pull me away, to insure “bodily integrity,” as the term of art of Greek law has it. Adrenaline brings clarity. My upturned palms are covered with blood from the gash on the back of my head. I hold them up. “American… Journalist… NOT political. What do you need?” My fingerprints blood my press pass as I hand it across.
A rare incident, I’m assured later by Greek friends, the police, the U. S. Consulate. And a modest one compared to the blood that had run through the aisles during so many of the thirty or so documentaries I’d seen in the ten days prior. Greek friends expressed concern about the temperature in their streets: these were the middle-aged fed up with riots in the streets of cities since the December shooting of a 15-year-old boy in the Exarchia district of Athens. What had I done? What a reviewer, a journalist, a photographer does. Just looking. My “crime.” Just being seen looking. And remembering the image of my two bloody hands, red, La chinoise-red, which I could not take a picture of.
CODA: Last week I saw Z for the first time in memory. Costa-Gavras’ restored thriller is the most authentic representation of getting your head lacerated in Greek street violence that I know. My injuries were in almost the same place on the back of the skull as those that kill Yves Montand’s political figure. I sat stock-still, rapt with fascination.
The Biggest Little Story In A While…
Wednesday, April 29th, 2009April 10 – Clearly the fringe operators are falling by the wayside, but the stalwarts like Village Roadshow, Spyglass, Legendary and Relativity are still very much in the game. Asked about one report that all was lost, the head of a production-financing entity said simply, “It’s true, but it’s not true. We’re raising money from a new banking source. We’re still players.”
Village Roadshow this year helped finance Clint Eastwood’s $40 million movie “Gran Torino,” which will do $260 million worldwide.
That’s the sort of result that keeps the money flowing. Or that finds new money.
April 16 – Village Roadshow Pictures, Warner Bros.’ longtime feature co-financing partner, was unable to deliver its share of funding on four titles last year, leaving the studio to cover the entire cost, Time Warner disclosed Wednesday.
Village Roadshow also may not be able to finance the 2009 films to which it has committed. The four pics from last year were “Get Smart,” “Gran Torino,” “Nights in Rodanthe” and “Yes Man.”
Hey… you… look at the agents putting all their suits in one closet… don’t pay any attention to THE MONEY THAT KEEPS THE BUSINESS GOING FALLING AWAY…
Hollywood’s studios have built a funding bubble around DVD bubble… not unlike Wall Street following the internet bubble with the real estate bubble. And the situation is just as bad… except that the infrastructure of a film studio is actually so much smaller than, say, the auto industry, that it can cruise along without acknowledging the RED ALERT for a couple of years.
If you want to know why the summer looks so much different than the last few summers, it is that responsible studio top execs put on the brakes over a year ago.
And what remains the biggest bullshit story in this industry right now? That the box office doing okay answers the questions that this industry has to face and face sharply.
What’s the second dumbest story? That the AMPTP behavior towards the unions/guilds was acceptable in the face of an economic downturn… when, in fact, the costs of non-star union talent is one of the smallest, already cut back budget lines on any movie or TV show…. and the stars are not an issue with these contracts since they essentially create their own rules via negotiation.
Anyway… Village Roadshow quietly not paying their bills is not a small story. (Financial Times did more than quote the earnings release and spoke to an unnamed source at Village Roadshow, who says that the company will eventually pony up what they owe.) And one of the least reported stories in town right now is the cash crunch being experienced at a few of the studios in particular. WB is fortunate that Harry Potter is here again. But those Friday night numbers are going to be sweatier this summer than any time in memory.
Barefoot and pregnant
Wednesday, April 29th, 2009It’s been a while since I’ve written about a story on Jeff Wells’ blog, Hollywood Elsewhere, but this one just got me so riled I couldn’t let it pass by. Wells wrote a piece (relatively tame, for him) about how he doesn’t like the way Sasha Grey speaks in The Girlfriend Experience. There’s nothing wrong with the post itself — hell, we all get annoyed by the smallest things about particular films from time to time.
No, what got me irritated was the first comment on the post, in which the writer essentially blames the decline of “standards, manners and civility across the board” on the advent of the two-income family. Read: on women who choose to have careers rather than stay home barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen, doing all those things that, you know, women are supposed to do. Because home is our place, right? What’s interesting is that the commenter very carefully avoids using the words “women” and “work” in the comment, but the intent underlying the comment is pretty clear.
Questions – Countdown To Summer
Wednesday, April 29th, 2009Wolverine launches tonight… what will May look like?
New on DVD: Nothing But the Truth
Wednesday, April 29th, 2009You could argue that Rod Lurie’s Nothing But the Truth, starring Kate Beckinsale and Vera Farmiga in career-high performances, lost out on being an Oscar contender because its distributor, Yari Film Group, declared bankruptcy. And you’d probably be right.
Loosely inspired by the Valerie Plame case, the film focuses on Rachel Armstrong (Beckinsale), a reporter who goes to jail rather than reveal her source for a Pulitzer-prize nominated story revealing Erica Van Doren (Farmiga), another mom at her son’s school, to secretly be a CIA operative.
The film shows us the events as they unfold from the perspective of a reporter who’s willing to stay in jail and lose her husband and son rather than reveal who her source was. And as you’re watching the film, while your sympathies lie primarily with Armstrong, there are points where you wonder, how much is this woman willing to take in fighting for this abstract principle of the right of a journalist to protect a source, even in matters the government considers to pertain to national security? You wonder, if I found myself in her place, would I have that strength myself?
Summer Movie Promo du Jour
Tuesday, April 28th, 2009
Not bad. Amusing for slightly longer than it takes to download the app, a period which counts as a long attention span these days. Find it here.
DP/30 – Anvil: The Story of Anvil
Tuesday, April 28th, 2009Wilmington on DVDs: Nothing But the Truth, Johnny Got His Gun, In the Realm of the Senses and more…
Tuesday, April 28th, 2009PICK OF THE WEEK: NEW
Nothing But the Truth” (Three Stars)
U. S. Rod Lurie, 2008 (Sony)
The most effective of writer-director (and ex-movie critic) Rod Lurie’s political melodramas (more…)
BYOB 42809
Tuesday, April 28th, 2009Sorry if I gave anyone whiplash with the problems loading the last entry… and sorry to the 99% of you who have no idea what I am talking about.
Does anyone care as little as I do about the agency merger?
Michael Speier writes in The Wrap, “The new company’s creation is, without a doubt, an industry-shifting jolt to the entertainment business at large. WME is now a company that will automatically rival CAA as the top agency in town both in terms of mojo and clients.”
But there is no real notion of why anyone who is not directly connected to this inside baseball story should be paying much attention. Will a greater consolidation of talent create better movies or just more shitty packages?
Agencies have too much power and are paid way too much money in packaging deals already… so is there some way that his deal changes that… aside from making it incrementally worse? I mean, agencies don’t MAKE anything… they are middle men.
And frankly, the one notable thing is the use of the word “Entertainment” in the new title, which scarily suggests that there may be an intention to assert more of a hand in developing movies and television… people whose jobs – with all due respect – are not to make anything of quality, but to sell something.
The real power remains with the studios and distribution channels, though the people in charge of these things often forget that they are The Money and that the agencies are not, giving too much to the agents and threatening the financial potential of projects.
What am I missing?
Hard Summer Questions, Part 2
Tuesday, April 28th, 2009How do you solve a problem like The Wolfie?
We have now moved into the last few days before the X-Men Origins: Wolverine is released. Tracking is solid. The Mexican opening has been delayed, but the rest of North America seems to be good to go. The film has been seen by a lot of press now, particularly the junketeers. The illegal leak of the film is sure to be mentioned in a majority of features and reviews in the days to come. Whatever the box office number, it will be spun by different people in different ways.
Last Friday, I wrote about the anonymous story on AICN and others picking up on that story. My core notion was that the story
















