MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Matson Is All Thumbs

matsonebert.jpg
The cartoon…

9 Responses to “Matson Is All Thumbs”

  1. Roman says:

    Classy.
    So long and thanks for all the thumbs, Roger.
    The curtain is not closed though as we still have Roger’s invaluable wesbsite.

  2. frankbooth says:

    For a minute there, you had me thinking that he had died.

  3. LexG says:

    Nice artwork, Ebert is THE KING…
    …but all of this coverage tends to slight ROEPER, the MOST RELIABLE CRITIC IN AMERICA for eight years on now.
    Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know… He doesn’t know his classic Hollywood cinema.
    You know what? FUCK ALL THAT. Movies before 1960 mostly SUCKED unless you are OLD.
    ROEPER = infinitely relatable, awesome, straight-shooter REGULAR GUY who SCORES CHICKS and OWNS ASS.
    Obviously Ebert is an incredible treasure (as was Siskel), but Roeper has at the VERY least done a yeoman’s job of filling a difficult spot for years and especially in the last two years keeping the show going and entertaining.
    ROEPS, IF YOU READ THIS SHIT, YOU ARE THE MAN. HIT ME UP ON MYSPACE AND TELL ME SOME STORIES ABOUT SCORING HOT CHICKS.
    ROEPER IS THE ENVY OF ALL CRITICS BECAUSE MOST OF THEM COULDN’T GET LAID IN A THAI BROTHEL WITH A STACK OF THOUSANDS WHILE WEARING BRAD PITT’S SKIN.

  4. TMJ says:

    Can we dial back the hero worship a tad and recognize that Ebert stopped grading on a legitimate scale years ago? It seems three is his lowest grade (on average) and many (too many) get a perfect four stars.
    I get it. Roger is thrilled to be alive, and his enthusiasm carries over to his films. But it’s tough to take any critic seriously when they give positive reviews to THE MUMMY (3 stars), SWING VOTE (3 stars), the dreadful X-FILES (3.5 stars), THE HAPPENING (3 stars) and so on.

  5. hcat says:

    now to be fair lex I am also frequently asked to leave brothels when I show up wearing other people’s skin, sure it is not Brad Pitt’s and usually that of some vagrants but let me assure you the practice is frowned upon.

  6. hcat says:

    And I am also amazed at the passes that he is giving terrible films but no amount of worship is to much for this man. I remember watching him and Siskel on PBS with my father and they are really the reason I starting loving movies. I was the only kid in my eighth grade class who was excited to see Stand By Me because I liked the director’s previous work.
    Seeing that we are always on the verge of losing him I am glad the community still gets the chance to applaud him.

  7. Cadavra says:

    “Movies before 1960 mostly SUCKED unless you are OLD.”
    Lex, if you really believe that, you’re even a bigger ass than previously thought. If you just wanted to get a rise out of people, then Mission Accomplished.

  8. Pale Viewer says:

    Ebert was dead on with the X-Files. Plot was confusing and villains idiotic, but the film itself was a good old school thriller.
    The ending in a boat was both hilarious and sad, because we sure as hell aren’t going to hear from Mulder and Scully any more.

  9. LexG says:

    Since the BYOB was in a mostly political bent, thought I’d bump for this:
    Apparently Ebert, Phillips, and Roeper didn’t even get to issue or say a proper farewell or give any sort of indication or explanation on the last “Ebert & Roeper,” which aired the weekend before last. That show went out with no acknowledgment that it would be last, not a word from R/P, then last weekend’s was a rerun as is this weekend’s.
    Christ, after eight years, Roeper wasn’t even allowed to say good-bye or thank the audience on his behalf and especially Roger’s? Thank Roger’s audience for watching for 30-some years????? Obviously Roeper and Ebert have made their opinions known elsewhere, but I wish the powers that be had allowed Roeper or Phillips to at least make a succinct farewell.
    Not blaming either, as I’m sure either guy would’ve been willing to say something tactful and at least acknowledge the situation… the whole scenario is just depressing and a prime example of how NOT to treat a well-liked show, its fans, its stars, its fans, and its legacy.

Leave a Reply

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

MB Cool. I was really interested in the aerial photography from Enter the Void and how one could understand that conceptually as a POV, while in fact it’s more of an objective view of the city where the story takes place. So it’s an objective and subjective camera at the same time. I know that you’re interested in Kubrick. We’ve talked about that in the past because it’s something that you and I have in common—

GN You’re obsessed with Kubrick, too.

MB Does he still occupy your mind or was he more of an early influence?

GN He was more of an early influence. Kubrick has been my idol my whole life, my own “god.” I was six or seven years old when I saw 2001: A Space Odyssey, and I never felt such cinematic ecstasy. Maybe that’s what brought me to direct movies, to try to compete with that “wizard of Oz” behind the film. So then, years later, I tried to do something in that direction, like many other directors tried to do their own, you know, homage or remake or parody or whatever of 2001. I don’t know if you ever had that movie in mind for your own projects. But in my case, I don’t think about 2001 anymore now. That film was my first “trip” ever. And then I tried my best to reproduce on screen what some drug trips are like. But it’s very hard. For sure, moving images are a better medium than words, but it’s still very far from the real experience. I read that Kubrick said about Lynch’s Eraserhead, that he wished he had made that movie because it was the film he had seen that came closest to the language of nightmares.

Matthew Barney and Gaspar Noé

A Haunted House 2 is not a movie. It is a nervous breakdown. Directed by Michael Tiddes but largely the handiwork of star, producer, and co-writer Marlon Wayans, the film is being billed as yet another Wayans-ized spoof of the horror movie genre, à la the first Haunted House movie and the wildly successful Scary Movie series. (Keenen Ivory Wayans and his brothers were responsible for the first two Scary Movie films; they have since left that franchise, which may explain why a new one was needed.) And there are some familiar digs at recent horror flicks: This time, the creepy doll and the closet from The Conjuring, the family-murdering demon from Sinister, and the dybbuk box from The Possession all make appearances. But this new film is mostly an excuse for star Marlon Wayans to have extended freak-outs in response to the horrors visited upon him—shrieking, screaming, crying, cowering, and occasionally hate-fucking for minutes on end. Yes, you read that last bit right. A Haunted House 2 puts the satyriasis back in satire.”
Ebiri On A Haunted House 2