MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Best Review Of Meirelles' Blindness?


A Brazilian friend of the site, Cinema em Cena’s Pablo Villaca, sent this link, along with a translation into English. The moment is at a screening of Blindness, which is based on Jos

3 Responses to “Best Review Of Meirelles' Blindness?”

  1. Yeah I saw that. It’s sweet. It’ll make reading reviews interesting, considering it’s adaptation has been approved wholeheartedly (and very emotionally) by the author.

  2. Eric says:

    I saw the Blindness trailer with some friends. At the end of it, Moore says “The only thing more terrifying than blindness is being the only one who can see.” It’s supposed to be haunting or thought-provoking or something, but it comes off as just absurd. A bunch of people laughed, one guy said “Are you kidding? That’d be awesome.”
    I loved Meirelles’s City of God and thought Constant Gardener was pretty good. But it’s not a good sign if they’re so self-serious that it didn’t occur to them how ridiculous a line like that might sound. Talk about pretentious.

  3. jeffmcm says:

    I’ve respectfully disliked both of Meirelles’ films so far, and it sounds like he’s going to be 3 for 3 with this one. It sounds like the movie that everybody who disliked Children of Men claimed that one was.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

“When books become a thing, they can no longer be fine.

“Literary people get mad at Knausgård the same way they get mad at Jonathan Franzen, a writer who, if I’m being honest, might be fine. I’m rarely honest about Jonathan Franzen. He’s an extremely annoying manI have only read bits and pieces of his novels, and while I’ve stopped reading many novels even though they were pretty good or great, I have always stopped reading Jonathan Franzen’s novels because I thought they were aggressively boring and dumb and smug. But why do I think this? I didn’t read him when he was a new interesting writer who wrote a couple of weird books and then hit it big with ‘The Corrections,’ a moment in which I might have picked him up with curiosity and read with an open mind; I only noticed him once, after David Foster Wallace had died, he became the heir apparent for the Great American Novelist position, once he had had that thing with Oprah and started giving interviews in which he said all manner of dumb shit; I only noticed him well after I had been told he was An Important Writer.

“So I can’t and shouldn’t pretend that I am unmoved by the lazily-satisfied gentle arrogance he projects or when he is given license to project it by the has-the-whole-world-gone-crazy development of him being constantly crowned and re-crowned as Is He The Great American Writer. What I really object to is this, and if there’s anything to his writing beyond it, I can’t see it and can’t be bothered. Others read him and tell me he’s actually a good writer—people whose critical instincts I have learned to respect—so I feel sure that he’s probably a perfectly fine, that his books are fine, and that probably even his stupid goddamned bird essays are probably also fine.

“But it’s too late. He has become a thing; he can’t be fine.”
~ Aaron Bady

“You know how in postproduction you are supposed to color-correct the picture so everything is smooth and even? Jean-Luc wants the opposite. He wants the rupture. Color and then black and white, or different intensities of color. Or how in this film, sometimes you see the ratio of the frame change after the image begins. That happens when he records from his TV onto his old DVCAM analog machine, which is so old we can’t even find parts when it needs to be repaired. The TV takes time to recognize and adjust to the format on the DVD or the Blu-ray. Whether it’s 1:33 or 1:85. And one of the TVs he uses is slower than the other. He wants to keep all that. I could correct it, but he doesn’t want me to. See, here’s an image from War and Peace. He did the overlays of color—red, white, and blue—using an old analog video effects machine. That’s why you have the blur. When I tried to redo it in digital, I couldn’t. The edges were too sharp. And why the image jitters—I don’t know how he did that. Playing with the cable maybe. Handmade. He wants to see that. It’s a gift from his old machine.”
~ Fabrice Aragno