MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Best Review Of Meirelles' Blindness?


A Brazilian friend of the site, Cinema em Cena’s Pablo Villaca, sent this link, along with a translation into English. The moment is at a screening of Blindness, which is based on Jos

3 Responses to “Best Review Of Meirelles' Blindness?”

  1. Yeah I saw that. It’s sweet. It’ll make reading reviews interesting, considering it’s adaptation has been approved wholeheartedly (and very emotionally) by the author.

  2. Eric says:

    I saw the Blindness trailer with some friends. At the end of it, Moore says “The only thing more terrifying than blindness is being the only one who can see.” It’s supposed to be haunting or thought-provoking or something, but it comes off as just absurd. A bunch of people laughed, one guy said “Are you kidding? That’d be awesome.”
    I loved Meirelles’s City of God and thought Constant Gardener was pretty good. But it’s not a good sign if they’re so self-serious that it didn’t occur to them how ridiculous a line like that might sound. Talk about pretentious.

  3. jeffmcm says:

    I’ve respectfully disliked both of Meirelles’ films so far, and it sounds like he’s going to be 3 for 3 with this one. It sounds like the movie that everybody who disliked Children of Men claimed that one was.

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

“What Quibi trying to do is get to the next generation of film narrative. The first generation was movies, and they were principally two-hour stories that were designed to be watched in a single sitting in a movie theater [ED: After formats like the nickelodeon]. The next generation of film narrative was television, principally designed to be watched in one-hour chapters in front of a television set. I believe the third generation of film narrative will be a merging of those two ideas, which is to tell two-hour stories in chapters that are seven to ten minutes in length. We are actually doing long-form in bite-size.”
~ Jeffrey Katzenberg

“The important thing is: what makes the audience interested in it? Of course, I don’t take on any roles that don’t interest me, or where I can’t find anything for myself in it. But I don’t like talking about that. If you go into a restaurant and you have been served an exquisite meal, you don’t need to know how the chef felt, or when he chose the vegetables on the market. I always feel a little like I would pull the rug out from under myself if I were to I speak about the background of my work. My explanations would come into conflict with the reason a movie is made in the first place — for the experience of the audience — and that, I would not want.
~  Christoph Waltz