MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Posted Monday, January 28th, 2008 - 19 Comments »

Direct-To-Bad-Journalism

I don

19 Comments »

19 Responses to “Direct-To-Bad-Journalism”

  1. KamikazeCamelV2.0 says:
    January 29, 2008 at 5:14 am

    I don’t really have anything of worth to say other than the direct-to-dvd market has been getting very strange here lately. Movies that went theatrical in America are skipping it here and just being released on DVD months later. Movies like Bug, The Lookout, Romance & Cigarettes, Year of the Dog. Add that to the piles of Asian horror films and lame American sequels I suppose.
    But it’s good because I wouldn’t have spent $14 on them at the cinema anyway. Shame we still have to wait half a year for them.

  2. luxofthedraw says:
    January 29, 2008 at 6:57 am

    David, is there a difference in your mind between movies made specifically for direct to dvd and movies with a dvd premiere?

  3. eoguy says:
    January 29, 2008 at 8:21 am

    Does anybody have an old story on that Weinstein/Blockbuster lawsuit? I did a quick search online but couldn’t come up with anything. I’d like to know more about it.

  4. Direwolf says:
    January 29, 2008 at 9:21 am

    Nothing to add here but wanted to publicly thank DP for inviting myself and my daughter to join him and his friends for dinner one night at Sundance. It was a very nice thing to do and he and his friends made us feel right at home.

  5. Joe Leydon says:
    January 29, 2008 at 10:15 am

    Speaking of bad journalism — this is from the Reuters story announcing that Crash will spin off a weekly series for the Starz network:
    “The new project would mark only the second time a best film Oscar winner has been made into a TV series. The first was the 1967 film In the Heat of the Night, another movie with strong racial themes that debuted as a CBS drama two decades later.”
    Uh, no. Try Going My Way (1944), which spun off a 1962-63 series version with Gene Kelly in the Bing Crosby role.
    I would also add The Greatest Show on Earth (1952), but, to be fair, the 1963-64 series with Jack Palance realy had little in common with the original film other than a title.

  6. Joe Leydon says:
    January 29, 2008 at 10:18 am

    And, of course, there were TWO different attempts to turn Casablanca into a series. But the less said about them, the better.

  7. Cadavra says:
    January 29, 2008 at 11:13 am

    And one more: FROM HERE TO ETERNITY, which was remade in 1979 as a mini-series, which in turn spun off a short-lived weekly series. It starred Don Johnson, William Devane, Barbara Hershey and a young Kim Basinger in the roles originally played by, respectively, Clift, Lancaster, Kerr and Reed. (Devane and Basinger carried over from the mini-series, in which Natalie Wood played the Kerr role; she obviously would not commit to a series.)

  8. LYT says:
    January 29, 2008 at 11:17 am

    How do you do Crash as a series? I thought a large part of the movie’s appeal was the way it all came full circle rather than being open-ended.
    Do the same people each week realize how racist they are, then forget by the following week so they can learn it again?

  9. Joe Leydon says:
    January 29, 2008 at 11:24 am

    Cadavra: Good catch. Didn’t think about that one.

  10. Rob says:
    January 29, 2008 at 12:05 pm

    I think they should take the Sandra Bullock storyline and turn into a sitcom about a wacky socialite and the Latina maid she occasionally spoons with. Kind of like the Megan Mullally character on Will & Grace.
    It could be called “You’re My Best Frieeeeeend!”

  11. Earl Hofert says:
    January 29, 2008 at 2:39 pm

    My guess is that they will use the same template that was deployed for the late, great “Red Shoe Diaries”–every week, someone will write a letter to David Duchovny (hey, he’s done double TV duty before)in which they confess that they never thought about racism before and it will segue into a tale that reminds us that Racism Is Bad.

  12. Earl Hofert says:
    January 29, 2008 at 2:41 pm

    Also, there will also be a recurring weekly bit in which Sandra Bullock takes a header down a flight of stairs a la Kenny in “South Park.”

  13. David Poland says:
    January 29, 2008 at 2:44 pm

    Yes, Lux… mostly.
    Of course, there is low-end filmmaking that hopes for a theatrical and there is high-aspiring filmmaking that hopes for a theatrical. They are different, obviously.
    There is a new strata, created by Disney in one way and then Sony Home Ent in another.
    One thing I forgot to mention in my piece is that the key point of transition, in my view, was when DVD release marketing budgets passed the $10 million mark. New ballgame.
    But if you are more specific, I will be more specific in my response.

  14. Joe Leydon says:
    January 29, 2008 at 3:25 pm

    FYI: I wrote this piece nearly eight years ago about the “stars” of made-for-video movies. Anyone care to add new names?
    http://www.movingpictureshow.com/dialogues/mpsVideoStars.htm

  15. Earl Hofert says:
    January 29, 2008 at 3:44 pm

    Seagal and Snipes immediately leap to mind

  16. THX5334 says:
    January 29, 2008 at 4:34 pm

    I’ve never been into Direct to DVD.
    But, I am excited at the prospect of the discussion of taking popular television shows that have been or going to be canceled, and continuing the stories in Direct to DVD movies.
    Battlestar Galactica has had great success with their Razor DVD (I lurved it) and there is talks of continuing with more DVD’s when the series ends next season.
    I believe they are doing the same with Babylon 5.
    I would love to see something like this happen with the Firefly franchise, since they’re not going to do any more features.
    A little off topic, but many of my non-cinephile friends keep bringing up Serenity and how much they love it after catching it on cable.
    Is it me, or is Serenity becoming one of those films that got missed at theatres, but is gaining real cult status and mas respect?
    I know we’ve discussed films like this here before. It seems Serenity is the latest and greatest.

  17. David Poland says:
    January 29, 2008 at 4:50 pm

    It seems to me that Serenity was right at the tipping point of the major sea change that DVD brought to TV.
    If you have a strong enough niche, shows that were once losers can now be winners. They still don’t have a place on network TV… the same way that many Direct-To-DVD films don’t have the juice to support a theatrical, even if they are DVD hits.
    I am not a fan of Serenity… but then again, I was not a fan of Firefly. But it’s not about me at all.
    It’s ironic that in the media, we excuse many of the major losers because they open big but dismiss the weak openers even when they become cash cows.
    Remember… Juno, which just crossed $100 million, will be amongst the 10 most profitable films of 2007, along with 300, Knocked Up, Superbad, The Simpsons, and Ratatouille.

  18. jeffmcm says:
    January 29, 2008 at 7:51 pm

    Didn’t Ratatouille cost significantly more than any of those others?

  19. KamikazeCamelV2.0 says:
    January 29, 2008 at 7:59 pm

    “Do the same people each week realize how racist they are, then forget by the following week so they can learn it again?”
    That actually made me laugh out loud. Thank you LYT. I have to go to work in 10 minutes but that put a smile on my face.

Leave a Reply

The Hot Blog

Comments Most Recent Archives

Quote Unquotesee all »

“I don’t really think, Sean, that you need to know about my various sexual liaisons. Or that anyone else needs to. I did write about them. I filled a hundred pages of Moleskine notebooks with my one-night stands, my affairs. But I decided they didn’t belong in a professional memoir. First of all, these are real people we’re talking about. Many of them were enjoyable. Some were abject failures. My wife said to me when she read the pages, ‘Of what purpose is this in a memoir? Of what purpose is this other than to titillate?’ The point is, I never see them. It’s because I have nothing in common with them, frankly. And probably didn’t at the time. I could not provide a sensible reason why I married these women. The thing is, in the case of my marriages, it takes two people to fuck up a marriage. It wasn’t simply the fault of these women that I lost interest in them and realised they were insignificant relationships. Which is how I look at them right now–as being insignificant. I see them as blips.”
~ William Friedkin On Cutting Interviewers Off At The Sass

“I have to imagine from Mr. Spielberg’s point of view, the paradigm shift in the 1970s was just the new “normal,” a “halcyon era” from which we are straying in the 21st century–because theatrical exhibition is tenuous (as it has been since the 1940s), the home video market has dried up and people are watching pirated movies on their phone. Spielberg’s coming-of-age era was for him the halcyon period that the 21st century “implosion” will cause to go “crashing into the ground.” But he is wrong. The market for movies is actually diverse and highly segmented–although from the top-down movie industry vantage point and media punditry you would not think this to be true.  Would we really mourn for Mr. Spielberg or ourselves if Lincoln would have been made for cable or had played on public television?  Is it bad for humanity that cable television is creating wonderful, resonant stories in long-form series that people want to watch at home on TV (or streamed onto their computer)? I don’t think so, but it is a paradigm shift and it might affect people’s theatrical moviegoing habits. Televisions in people’s homes have had that effect for seven decades–it is not a new phenomenon. As Art House cinema impresarios we need to focus on what WE can do at our theaters and in our communities. It is not productive for us to fret over what pundits say or about what well-meaning filmmakers like the Stevens–Spielberg and Soderbergh–say. We should fret about what we can do in our communities. What we can do to support filmmakers.”
~ From A Response By Russ Collins, CEO, Michigan Theater–Ann Arbor And Director, Art House Convergence, To Mr. Spielberg