MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Interesting Screener Thing

I just threw Little Miss Sunshine into the DVD player for the first time, mostly to make sure the disc was working, and I have had a bit of a baby revelation .
This movie plays a lot better on DVD than on a big screen.
People talk about the number of DVDs and the delivery dates a lot. But a small scale movie with strong performances, a lot of close-ups, and of course, status as a comedy, does seem to have a real advantage on DVD. And in this case, it is a movie with a lot of pastels, which really jump in a different way on the TV screen. The color is dense in a way you rarely see on TV.
I was already feeling like LMS had moved into a likely BP slot. But watching it on TV, even more so. I think that a lot of people who were so-so-on it will see it over the holidays with their families who want to watch it and find themselves surprised by being more engaged.

29 Responses to “Interesting Screener Thing”

  1. The Carpetmuncher says:

    first…
    Intersting you feel that way, but in my experience, comedies typically play better in front of large audiences, because laughter is frequently contagious. The crowd at LMS was rolling in the aisles during that last dance sequence.

  2. David Poland says:

    Every audience is different, Munchy.
    Yes, optimal is a big rolling audience… for any movie.

  3. The Carpetmuncher says:

    I have to admit I saw LMS in a press/industry screening at Sundance too, which as you know are usually staid affairs, but even there it killed. Just like BORAT did in Toronto.
    When the press and acquisitions execs, in their 5th screening of the day, still laugh their ass off, you know you’ve got a likely winner.
    I think Dave’s right that LMS is moving up, partly because people will remember how much they loved it, and partly because highly expected films like FLAGS have gotten luke-warm reviews…

  4. William Goss says:

    Do you think that voters will support an arguably lightweight film in an effort to somewhat compensate for the likely dismissal of weightier offerings like Babel, U93 or WTC?

  5. T.H. Unfassung says:

    Totally agree, this screener is going in lots of luggage home for the holidays, and it’s going to resonate.

  6. PetalumaFilms says:

    I say more power to it, I really enjoyed the flick and I’ve always admired Faris and Dayton from their video work and LMS was really good.

  7. JWEgo says:

    I love your obsession with goddamn Oscars. LMS gets Zero. For certain.
    I am Jeff Wells Ego and I love LUNCH WITH DAVID because it makes me feel better as a person!

  8. Me says:

    It’s certainly one of the few movies I’ve seen this year that I remember fondly. And as I’ve yet to see anything that has gotten me mildly interested during this so-called quality season, I don’t see why LMS can’t break into the BP race, the same way The Full Monty did a while back.
    Another thing is that it’s not really an out there comedy, the way Charlie Kaufman’s movies have been (and been overlooked for it). LMS is very approachable, and in some ways conventional. I think the Academy could end up embracing it, at least as much as they did Sideways (though I think that will have had more critical acclaim going for it than LMS will).

  9. Blackcloud says:

    Totally off topic, but am I the only one who’s been having problems with Fandango today (Halloween)?

  10. PetalumaFilms says:

    DP-
    Good call on putting the trailer for THE HAMILTONS up on MCN!! My buddies made that…here in F-ing PETALUMA and it got picked up by Lionsgate!! 350 screens in 50 cities in the next 2 weeks! Truly a great local boys make good in cinema fairy tale.
    Who was it that said the days of CLERKS and EL MARIACHI are over? Oh yeah, me. I stand corrected.

  11. jeffmcm says:

    JWEgo, you’re completely new to this blog and not at all a new alias. Welcome.

  12. jeffmcm says:

    Actually, this screener thing kind of sucks. It certainly explains how CRASH won because it plays like a made-for-TV movie. I kind of feel like Academy members who don’t see the movies in theaters shouldn’t be allowed to vote for Best Cinematography.

  13. lazarus says:

    Personally, I don’t think they should be allowed to vote for anything if they haven’t seen all the nominees in the theatre. If they’re too geriatric to get their asses outside, scratch them off the list. What’s lame is that you can be too young to be in the Academy, but not too old. They should phase people out after they hit 70 or something so you don’t have these out-of-touch feebs affecting the outcomes.
    Yes, asking people to judge a film’s cinematography at home is like Grammy voters listening to nominees on a transistor radio and voting for best engineered album.

  14. EDouglas says:

    “JWEgo, you’re completely new to this blog and not at all a new alias. Welcome.”
    Or maybe he just forgot which blog he was posting to…
    I am a has-been Hollywood producer with way too much time on my hands.

  15. Stella's Boy says:

    LMS still gets my vote for most overrated movie of the year.

  16. MarkVH says:

    Let’s get one thing straight here – Little Miss Sunshine is a nice movie with a killer ending – but it’s not fit to lick the dirt off Sideways’ boots.
    It’s easily the most overpraised film of the year, and I’m really kind of sick of people shoehorning this movie into the Best Picture race simply for counterprogramming reasons. Gleiberman was right – everyone in the film, with the exception of Abigail Breslin, is playing a “type.” They’re not really characters. Arkin is funny, but he overplays.
    All the advance Oscar hype for it seems to me like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole – somebody mentioned it in relation to Sideways, and all of a sudden it became “This Year’s Sideways!” Oy.
    Yes, I know there are people who genuinely love it. And yes, I know the B.O. has been strong. But it still feels to me like it’s being thrown out there as the “indie comedy” alternative to stuff like Flags, The Departed, etc. If it does managed to squeak into the final five, this is a really, really weak Oscar year.

  17. Josh Massey says:

    Well, it’s definitely a weak year. I think we all know that. Hell, I think “Slither” is still in my top five.

  18. Me says:

    It doesn’t feel like people are shoe-horning in LMS any more than people are shoe-horning in The Departed, which is nothing but Scorsese-lite.
    It’s a very weak year for films, so the few that people enjoy and remember thinking were well made are getting mentioned.

  19. Me says:

    Oh, and let’s not start building up the legend of Sideways, no matter how many middle-aged critics saw themselves in it. It was a rip-off of Swingers for old people.

  20. movielocke says:

    “it was a rip-off of Swingers for old people.”
    And here I’ve been describing it as, ‘Garden State with middle-aged kids.’
    I like the Swingers one too, though. Three very similar films.

  21. THX5334 says:

    Sideways is not holding up for me at all.

  22. James Leer says:

    I liked Sideways but I’m surprised more critics didn’t pick up on how it was — from characters to plotlines to even specific scenes — basically an older version of Swingers.

  23. Cadavra says:

    Personally, I’m saddened that PRAIRIE HOME COMPANION seems to have fallen into the abyss. I wouldn’t expect anything for movies no one saw, like DISTRICT B-13 or BRICK or KEEPING MUM, but jeez, it got to almost $20 million and it’s out on DVD. Whatta damn shame.

  24. Richard Nash says:

    I thought this was a good DVD movie when I saw it in the theatre. This could be a darkhorse come awards time if nothing jumps out between now and then.

  25. Yeah, in my initial thoughts of it that I wrote on my blog, I said that it’s one those sorts of movies that you’ll be able to put in the dvd player at any time and have a good hour and a half. Cause while it’s not deep and meaningful, it’s just a well made funny movie.
    Can I just say that I’m so bloody bored of people constantly moaning, groaning and bemoaning movies. If you don’t like movies anymore, why do you still watch them? Give it a rest for a while. It’d be beneficial to you and to the people who have to read about it.

  26. Stella's Boy says:

    Can I just say that I am so bloody bored of people moaning, groaning and complaining if others have the audacity to not like the same movies they do. Give it a rest for a while.

  27. Cadavra says:

    Can I just say that I am so bloody bored of people moaning, groaning and complaining about anything?

  28. Stella's Boy says:

    I’m sorry, but no you can’t do that.

  29. James Leer says:

    Is this the same KamikazeCamel that said he was “really happy” that Flags of our Father was flopping…without even having seen it?

Leave a Reply

Quote Unquotesee all »

“I don’t really think, Sean, that you need to know about my various sexual liaisons. Or that anyone else needs to. I did write about them. I filled a hundred pages of Moleskine notebooks with my one-night stands, my affairs. But I decided they didn’t belong in a professional memoir. First of all, these are real people we’re talking about. Many of them were enjoyable. Some were abject failures. My wife said to me when she read the pages, ‘Of what purpose is this in a memoir? Of what purpose is this other than to titillate?’ The point is, I never see them. It’s because I have nothing in common with them, frankly. And probably didn’t at the time. I could not provide a sensible reason why I married these women. The thing is, in the case of my marriages, it takes two people to fuck up a marriage. It wasn’t simply the fault of these women that I lost interest in them and realised they were insignificant relationships. Which is how I look at them right now–as being insignificant. I see them as blips.”
~ William Friedkin On Cutting Interviewers Off At The Sass

“I have to imagine from Mr. Spielberg’s point of view, the paradigm shift in the 1970s was just the new “normal,” a “halcyon era” from which we are straying in the 21st century–because theatrical exhibition is tenuous (as it has been since the 1940s), the home video market has dried up and people are watching pirated movies on their phone. Spielberg’s coming-of-age era was for him the halcyon period that the 21st century “implosion” will cause to go “crashing into the ground.” But he is wrong. The market for movies is actually diverse and highly segmented–although from the top-down movie industry vantage point and media punditry you would not think this to be true.  Would we really mourn for Mr. Spielberg or ourselves if Lincoln would have been made for cable or had played on public television?  Is it bad for humanity that cable television is creating wonderful, resonant stories in long-form series that people want to watch at home on TV (or streamed onto their computer)? I don’t think so, but it is a paradigm shift and it might affect people’s theatrical moviegoing habits. Televisions in people’s homes have had that effect for seven decades–it is not a new phenomenon. As Art House cinema impresarios we need to focus on what WE can do at our theaters and in our communities. It is not productive for us to fret over what pundits say or about what well-meaning filmmakers like the Stevens–Spielberg and Soderbergh–say. We should fret about what we can do in our communities. What we can do to support filmmakers.”
~ From A Response By Russ Collins, CEO, Michigan Theater–Ann Arbor And Director, Art House Convergence, To Mr. Spielberg