From a John Cassidy piece in The New Yorker entitled, “RELATIVELY DEPRIVED – How poor is poor?,” this notion:
In 2001, ninety-one per cent of poor families owned color televisions; seventy-four per cent owned microwave ovens; fifty-five per cent owned VCRs; and forty-seven per cent owned dishwashers. Are these families poverty-stricken?
and
Consider a hypothetical single mother with two teen-age sons living in New Orleans
Jermsguy on: Trailer: The Wolverine
chris on: BYOB: Gone Francin'
Bulldog68 on: Review-ish: Star Trek: Into Darkness (spoiler-free)
movielocke on: Cannes '13: What Is This Thing Called Love?
hcat on: BYOB: Gone Francin'
anghus on: Review-ish: Star Trek: Into Darkness (spoiler-free)
SamLowry on: BYOB: Gone Francin'
Etguild2 on: Trailer: The Wolverine
Etguild2 on: BYOB: Gone Francin'
PcChongor on: Cannes '13: What Is This Thing Called Love?
Cannes ’13: What Is This Thing Called Love?
DP/30 @ Sundance ’13: We Steal Secrets: The Story Of Wikileaks, documentarian Alex Gibney
DP/30: What Maisie Knew, screenwriter Carroll Cartwright
DP/30: Fill The Void, director Rama Burshtein, actress Hadas Yaron
Weekend Estimates by Cap’n Klady
see all »
RT @kingsthings: Hate it when refs in basketball over referee like in the Miami/Pacers game-one wrong look & you get a technical foul-let t…
RT @ADuralde: My friends who avoid certain venues because of young movie fans should be here with the old movie fans. Basically, everyone's…
RT @MarkDuplass: 18 years ago I drove 70 miles on a Friday night by myself to see BEFORE SUNRISE in the theater. It's been a long journey. …
DP: @braxtonpope @Dealfatigue Admissions are a crap way of analyzing business… except for exhibs. And even so, hardly the exodus media claims
DP: @Dealfatigue Can’t do research right now, but last I did, grossed were in line w/ history of most genres in US. Costs of prod/mktg exploded
“The true punk film of the festival.”
~ Romain Blondeau On Claire Denis’ Les Saluds in Les Inrocks
“It’s also defined commercially by the difference between a colorful, Hawaii-set comedy starring George Clooney and a black-and-white, prairie-based old-age odyssey featuring a straggly and unkempt Bruce Dern. All the same, Paramount Vantage should be able to ride accolades for this very fine Cannes competition entry to respectable specialized returns in fall release.”
~ McCarthy On Nebraska
Kellie Pickler says: y’all ain’t seen no poor ’til y’all done seen mah trailer park.
“We’re not white trash!”
“Well, look what it’s done for Britney Spears…”
…so…
What are people’s predictions of United 93′s opening weekend?
It’s not good to be poor, but I’d rather be poor in 2006 than in 1906…heck, I’d still take it over being “poor” in 1986. The book to read is the Progress Paradox…it’ll put anyone who believes we’re not well off or declining in their place…even movie moguls!
As for United 93…I’ll say at least $20M. I don’t think people will line up to see it…but I think people who are scared away or repulsed by it are going to be the exception. As EW pointed out, 9/11 docs have been big numbers for TV.
$8/hr for working in a pre-Katrina, Ninth Ward supermarket? Don’t think so. As an ex-30-year New Orleans resident, I can say that the sad fact is she probably would have been earning not much more than minimum wage.
Obviously there are two different kinds of wealth or “capital”: monetary/material capital and social capital. They work profoundly differently. To just discuss material possessions is missing the point, because every homeless person in the country could be given an iPod, but that wouldn’t make them any less poor or homeless. I’m watching “Rize” and it’s weird how the dancers in the film don’t think they can make it in Hollywood just because the people there seem snobby. That kind of internal sense of poverty is much more complex than just the external one.
What’s the argument here? That things aren’t so bad for poor people because they have color TVs? So that therefore taxes could be higher to pay for more social programs? And I think I missed how this connects to Hollywood beyond the obvious fact that New Yorker liberals and Hollywood liberals are probably equally as misguided and ignorant about the poor.
I just found out who Kellie Pickler is. I guess it’s a sign that you’re getting old, when what formerly would have been ironic pop-culture gold is just another boring, stupid kid.
The writer ignores his own evidence to make his case for deprivation. Maybe Moms should be getting some money from the boys, ya think? No broadband? Don’t buy the stereo gear. Lack of access to SUV’s and cellphones will limit their “social achievement”? What the @$%#! does that mean? They won’t learn how to barrel down the highway slurping gas and scaring all the Mini Cooper drivers? They won’t learn how to be even less polite by yakking on a cell phone, dropping F-bombs while they wait in line at Radio Shack to buy some more gadgets? And what happened to the “DVD player” and the “Nintendo” the guys bought in the second cited paragraph? By paragraph three, they are examples of things they are deprived of. This is some shoddy thinking here, and tendentious in the extreme. One obviously doesn’t need to be living in the best part of town to be a spoiled punk teen anymore, of any color, creed, or sneaker brand. If these teen-age sons are enterprising enough, they can make off with some of the billions of dollars of aid that is now flowing to arguably one of the most corrupt cities in one of the most corrupt states in the country. Did you see that FEMA is already suing to get millions of dollars back from scammers and frauds? It’s the tip of a dirty iceberg, but never fear, Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton will provide cover for the thieves by imputing racism to anyone calling for honesty and common sense in this matter. Back to Moms, poor Moms; her own sons don’t even help her out, so just who is depriving precisely whom of exactly what?
Now that was a rant!
Too bad it was too angry to be convincing of anything.
I came back to see what might have been added here … and here’s this “jeffmcm” fellow calling ME angry, after he called someone a “boring, stupid kid.” But I suppose he meant it … what? … nicely? What a laugh! I don’t know what this guy read between the lines, but I am rarely angry; discouraged and irked by shoddy thinking, yes, but I don’t let anything stop me from smiling most of the time and singing silly ditties to my dogs. But I will certainly admit that I don’t suffer fools and excuse-makers well. I stand by everything I said above, and now I am even laughing about it
I did not write a longer post above. I don’t know what Erikjay is talking about, and we are not in agreement. His words go overboard, in my opinion.