
By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com
An Interesting Note From A Reader
Looking back on the last couple of years (that

Looking back on the last couple of years (that
Jermsguy on: Trailer: The Wolverine
chris on: BYOB: Gone Francin'
Bulldog68 on: Review-ish: Star Trek: Into Darkness (spoiler-free)
movielocke on: Cannes '13: What Is This Thing Called Love?
hcat on: BYOB: Gone Francin'
anghus on: Review-ish: Star Trek: Into Darkness (spoiler-free)
SamLowry on: BYOB: Gone Francin'
Etguild2 on: Trailer: The Wolverine
Etguild2 on: BYOB: Gone Francin'
PcChongor on: Cannes '13: What Is This Thing Called Love?
Cannes ’13: What Is This Thing Called Love?
DP/30 @ Sundance ’13: We Steal Secrets: The Story Of Wikileaks, documentarian Alex Gibney
DP/30: What Maisie Knew, screenwriter Carroll Cartwright
DP/30: Fill The Void, director Rama Burshtein, actress Hadas Yaron
Weekend Estimates by Cap’n Klady
see all »
RT @nigelmfs: Polanski's VENUS IN FUR is an energizing riot. The most purely enjoyable film I've seen at #Cannes2013
RT @gemko: Venus in Fur (Polanski): 61. As elegantly directed as CARNAGE, but with a decent text this time (albeit on a subject I find unin…
RT @JonathanRomney: VENUS - brittle, fun and blimey, a touch nor raunchy than his OLIVER TWIST.
DP: @TheCatManDude @Jack_Morrissey Remember… in this game, $450m ww is a flop. Personally, I love Pac Rim as the clean-up hitter.
DP: @TheCatManDude @Jack_Morrissey 5 straight wks. Man o Steel, WW Z, White House Down, Lone Ranger, Pacific Rim. 2 will likely suffer. Which 2?
“The true punk film of the festival.”
~ Romain Blondeau On Claire Denis’ Les Saluds in Les Inrocks
“It’s also defined commercially by the difference between a colorful, Hawaii-set comedy starring George Clooney and a black-and-white, prairie-based old-age odyssey featuring a straggly and unkempt Bruce Dern. All the same, Paramount Vantage should be able to ride accolades for this very fine Cannes competition entry to respectable specialized returns in fall release.”
~ McCarthy On Nebraska

Why is that interesting? Has anyone actually ever used Rotten Tomatoes as a barometer for the Oscar race?
In my mind, critics’ top ten lists are a pretty significant factor in the race, for both the studios budgeting their candidates and the Academy eyeing what films should be considered.
It’s kind of tough to get a bead on some of these earlier films. For instance, out of Africa only has 19 reviews on rotten tomatoes. Kramer vs. Kramer is 100% fresh, but off of only 20 reviews.
I was going to say the exact same thing as Paul. Especially when you take into consideration that now movies can have 100+ reviews. Even arthouse ones.
Box Office: Narnia overtakes Kong for #1. Match Point could have a PSA of over $60,000 – very nice.
Rotten Tomatoe’s isn’t a good barometer of Award success.