MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland

A New Level Of Arrogance

All I can say is, “Wow!”
Slandered by Patrick Goldstein in the morning… the attacking paper wanting free content for their effort in the afternoon.
The e-mail….
—–Original Message—–
From: Rushfield, Richard
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 2:09 PM
To: Rushfield, Richard
Subject: Your response sought
Dear Blogger,
As you may have seen, this morning the LA Times Calendar Section published a piece by columnist Patrick Goldstein taking on the phenomenon of online Oscar prognostication and the effect of blogs and the web rumor mill on entertainment coverage at large. You can read the full piece here:,0,2796255.story?coll=env-home-headlines
The Envelope, the Times’ awards site, would like to open up the debate on this question and invite you to respond to the Goldstein column. Over the next few days, we will feature on The Envelope site the responses of prominent bloggers and online entertainment reporters to the column.
If you would like to join the debate, please send your response to me at this address and we will post them quickly. Hope you can weigh in and share with us your perspective and experience on this issue. But please, as we are still a family corner of the internet, we’ll have to ask you to check any profanity at the door.
Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Best wishes,
Richard Rushfield
Senior Editor

Breathtaking. The first thing that actually generates any attention for The Envelope is a piece attacking everyone else. Think of the journalistic significance of that. The only thing left to build the LA Times film coverage on is bitter rage and the subsequent aftermath. Worthy of Karl Rove.
I will not be participating. I have said my share. And any discussion about whether the awards season has gotten out of hand will be on my own terms, not in response to Patrick Goldstein’s blathering.
But then again, Jeffrey Wells is already basking in the glow of being called “The Lewis Black of Oscar Blogging” and Tom O’Neil is sending out links to Goldstein and his lame response under the subject line, “OSCAR BLOGGERS BITCH FIGHT!”
Can we get any lower?

13 Responses to “A New Level Of Arrogance”

  1. Blackcloud says:

    “Can we get any lower?”
    I feel confident in asserting that we will know the answer to that question sooner rather than later.

  2. tapley says:

    Hmm. Should I be upset I didn’t get such an arrogant email?
    (As I said in my own response – I just hope Goldstein loses my email address.)

  3. James Leer says:

    Hee. “Oscar Bloggers Bitch Fight.”

  4. PandaBear says:

    They got some balls. But I guess that is how they operate there.

  5. Angelus21 says:

    Did Goldstein have to look up what “blogging” meant?
    Out of touch.

  6. Josh says:

    Why do they have to solicit responses to something so blatantly terrible?
    Why not link up Dave’s response and his website? Or is that too much to ask?

  7. joefitz84 says:

    Tom O’Neil. Can you get lamer?

  8. tapley says:

    “Hmm. Should I be upset I didn’t get such an arrogant email?”
    Ha. Nevermind. It went to my junk folder. Tehe.

  9. Bruce says:

    The word “clueless” comes to mind.

  10. Blackcloud says:

    “Ha. Nevermind. It went to my junk folder. Tehe.”
    If I were Mickey Kaus, I’d say, “And so did the rest of the paper.” But I’m not, so I won’t.

  11. Sanchez says:

    Fine, I’ll say it. I trashed the rest of the paper.

  12. Blackcloud says:

    I stand corrected: Mickey Kaus has commented on Goldstein’s article. As Kaus might say, “At least Goldstein’s only covering the Hollywood beat, it’s not as if that’s important in L.A. or anything.”
    You have to scroll down a bit, it’s the second post after the long one on Bob Woodward.

  13. bicycle bob says:

    u think this guy feels a tad threatened on his little old perch?

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

“What Quibi trying to do is get to the next generation of film narrative. The first generation was movies, and they were principally two-hour stories that were designed to be watched in a single sitting in a movie theater [ED: After formats like the nickelodeon]. The next generation of film narrative was television, principally designed to be watched in one-hour chapters in front of a television set. I believe the third generation of film narrative will be a merging of those two ideas, which is to tell two-hour stories in chapters that are seven to ten minutes in length. We are actually doing long-form in bite-size.”
~ Jeffrey Katzenberg

“The important thing is: what makes the audience interested in it? Of course, I don’t take on any roles that don’t interest me, or where I can’t find anything for myself in it. But I don’t like talking about that. If you go into a restaurant and you have been served an exquisite meal, you don’t need to know how the chef felt, or when he chose the vegetables on the market. I always feel a little like I would pull the rug out from under myself if I were to I speak about the background of my work. My explanations would come into conflict with the reason a movie is made in the first place — for the experience of the audience — and that, I would not want.
~  Christoph Waltz