MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland

How Are Things Going At DreamWorks?

THB. React.
LATE ADDITION: An excellent piece on DW by Kate Kelly and Merissa Marr at the WSJ brought up a key element that has escaped me… a major piece of the value of DreamWorks live action is that they have distribution rights to all the DreamWorks Animation films. That alone could add $50 million to $100 million a year in net revenue to DreamWorks SKG. Interesting….

36 Responses to “How Are Things Going At DreamWorks?”

  1. oldman says:

    Is the above logo JAWS IV?

  2. joefitz84 says:

    Looks like Dreamworks is going out in a blaze of glory.

  3. Panda Bear says:

    They need a serious cash infusion. STAT.

  4. Lota says:

    your picture isn’t finished. You need a caption that has the shark saying: “WHo’s your Daddy?” to DreamWorks

  5. oldman says:

    Dreamworks must have said or done something that really peaved off Paul Allen. He has the deep pockets and patience to back risky ventures. I vagely recall that Allen was suppose to be able to cash out (5 years?) in the original deal. The fact that he wants out must make DW nervous.

  6. jeffrey boam's doctor says:

    that would be JAWS V old man.

  7. oldman says:

    Jeezz, you mean I missed Jaws IV? sigh

  8. Angelus21 says:

    They really needed a studio lot. They are just a big production company and no production company can afford 50mill bombs.

  9. sky_capitan says:

    Paul Allen should pull his money out of the Portland Trailblazers first (although he’s the one who drove that NBA team into the ground…)

  10. jeffrey boam's doctor says:

    forget THE ISLAND – i think infuriating your shareholders by returning 30,000,000+ dvd units over the space of a couple of months is a lot worse than a Bay bellyflop.

  11. lindenen says:

    I’m clueless. Why would a studio lot have made much of a difference?

  12. Chester says:

    JBD, is that 30 million number of returns right? I know the DVD has sold about 35 million units so far, well below projected estimates, but an extra 30 million copies seems amazingly high. I’m not doubting you, I’m just asking for a confirmation.

  13. jeffmcm says:

    Studio lots are huge sources of income. They rent studio space, office space, sets, costumes, props, scoring stages, etc. out to productions. Dreamworks has been living off of Universal its entire life.
    What DVD are you talking about?

  14. Panda Bear says:

    How are the Trail Blazers in the ground? They got the best collection of young talent in the league right now. The Jail Blazer stuff is done.

  15. Chester says:

    The DVD in question is “Shrek 2.”

  16. jj says:

    This looks like it’s becoming inevitable. Sadly, more excellent marketing and distrobution people will loose their jobs. In a market already flooded with MGM and soon to be Miramax people looking for work. Didn’t Sumner Redstone say the big Media model wasn’t working any more? I would be happier with EA or an outside company buying DW than Uni.

  17. KamikazeCamel says:

    I believe something like 80% of Miramax’s staff is simply moving to the Weinstein’s new company.

  18. bicycle bob says:

    so dreamworks owes its existence and future existence to shrek?

  19. Bruce says:

    They have really been a waste of talent and money and time since they started. They’re television division has been downright awful. It’s a miracle they didn’t need this money 3 years ago.

  20. BluStealer says:

    I don’t really care of the internal politics of the this situation and others like it but if we lose Dreamworks then thats a lot of movies that won’t get financed or made.

  21. Bruce says:

    I hope they don’t go under or start cutting back on their already minimal production schedules. A lot of cast and crews will be out of work.

  22. PastePotPete says:

    The main problem with Dreamworks imo is that there was no point to it. Any of their movies could have been made anywhere else, it’s not like Miramax where they pretty much created a category. Even New Line for a long while was adept at providing films that the majors wouldn’t touch. Dreamworks felt like a carbon copy of a major studio from day one.

  23. Terence D says:

    I always assumed they’d build a lot and make it like one of those classic studios from the Golden Age.

  24. joel says:

    This is what happens when you get in business with Michael Bay.

  25. teambanzai says:

    After the eco-terrorists stopped them from building a studio on the old Hughes property they just sort of gave up on the idea and settle at Universal.

  26. oldman says:

    Is Bay being set up as “the man who killed DW”?

  27. Panda Bear says:

    All the people before this who made Millions off of Bay aren’t complaining.

  28. Terence D says:

    One movie doesn’t sink a studio. The Island isn’t Heaven’s Gate. Far from it.

  29. Mason says:

    Actually it’s pretty damn close.

  30. jeffmcm says:

    Studios have a bomb this size on an annual basis these days. Heaven’s Gate was the equivalent of a movie like Titanic grossing $20 million.

  31. Mark says:

    The Island will make most of its money back overseas and on the DVD market. The only people taking shots now are the anti Bay crowd.

  32. teambanzai says:

    I don’t think it was the size of the budget of the Bay bomb that worried people. I looks like it was more of a case of none of them saw it coming. When you’re predicting 20+ million opening weekend, which granted is already low for what’s supposed to be a summer blockbuster and you get 12, I think that shakes the cofidence in the yet to be released. Especially after what happened with the Shrek 2 DVD sales. So while they may not have been dragged under by The Island, but they may fear it could happen so it’s just easier to shore everything up by dragging another studio down with them.

  33. Sanchez says:

    The Island will make it all back overseas. Foreign people love dumb action movies.

  34. KamikazeCamel says:

    But the movie business is different that how it was when Heaven’s Gate was out. As Jeff said studios suffer movies like The Island every year now. Besides, I think xXx2 will go down as the biggest flop of this year, considering The Island has a much better looking outlook for DVD.
    Besides, Dreamworks has been coasting along for a few years now. It seems that only their animated films and Meet The Fockers were successes. Infact those are the only Dreamworks movies I can think of of the last few years.
    And somebody up there said that Dreamworks’ movies could’ve been made anywhere else. And that’s true. In fact, a lot of them were. Spielberg’s are basically Universal, right?
    Seriously, I can’t really think of anything substantial that Dreamworks has done. They’ve been quiet on the awards circuit too, i believe.

  35. TheBrotherhoodOfTheLostSkeletonOfCadavra says:

    “They’ve been quiet on the awards circuit too, i believe.”
    Say what? How about three consecutive Best Picture Oscars: AMERICAN BEAUTY, GLADIATOR and A BEAUTIFUL MIND. (And they came within a whisker of four in a row with SAVING PRIVATE RYAN.)

  36. jeffrey boam's doctor says:

    kamikaze – being australian is not enough of an excuse for such clueless comments. Brotherhood served yo ass. ownd.

The Hot Blog

Hcat on: BYO Keanu

Stella's Boy on: BYO Keanu

movieman on: BYO Keanu

Triple Option on: BYO Keanu

Hcat on: BYO Keanu

Pete B. on: BYO Keanu

palmtree on: BYO Keanu

palmtree on: BYO Keanu

Stella's Boy on: BYO Keanu

Sideshow Bill on: BYO Keanu

Quote Unquotesee all »

“With any character, the way I think about it is, you have the role on the page, you have the vision of the director and you have your life experience… I thought it was one of the foundations of the role for John Wick. I love his grief. For the character and in life, it’s about the love of the person you’re grieving for, and any time you can keep company with that fire, it is warm. I absolutely relate to that, and I don’t think you ever work through it. Grief and loss, those are things that don’t ever go away. They stay with you.”
~ Keanu Reeves

“I was checking through stuff the other day for technical reasons. I came across The Duellists on Netflix and I was absolutely stunned to see that it was exquisitely graded. So, while I rarely look up my old stuff, I stopped to give it ten minutes. Bugger me, I was there for two hours. I was really fucking pleased with what it was and how the engine still worked within the equation and that engine was the insanity and stupidity of war. War between two men, in that case, who fight on thought they both eventually can’t remember the reason why. It was great, yeah. The great thing about these platforms now is that, one way or another, they’ll seek out and then put out the best possible form and the long form. Frequently, films get cut down because of that curse in which the studio felt or feels that they have to preview. And there’s nothing worse than a preview to diminish the original intent.Oh, yeah, how about every fucking time? And I’ve stewed about films later even more because when you tell the same joke 20 times the joke’s no longer funny. When you tell a bad joke once or twice? It’s fine. But come on, now. Here’s the key on the way I feel when I approach the movie: I try to keep myself as withdrawn from the project as possible once I’ve filmed it. And – this is all key on this – then getting a really excellent editor so I never have to sit in on editing. What happens if you sit in is you become stale and every passage or joke, metaphorically speaking, gets more and more tired. You start cutting it all back because of fatigue. So what you have to do is keep your distance and therefore, in a funny kind of way, you, as the director, should be the preview and that’s it.”
~ Sir Ridley Scott