MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

The Hot Blog has moved…

The Hot Blog is finally moving onto MCN turf.

The new URL is…

/columnists/poland/

I’ll be posting to both sites for a short while, but the sooner you start commenting over there instead of over there, the sooner the smooth transition will be complete…

3 Responses to “The Hot Blog has moved…”

  1. L&DB says:

    Are all of our comments going over there as well?
    If not, time to write about Lucas yet again!
    HUZZAH!

  2. Dwight Brown says:

    How about updating the links at http://www.thehotbutton.com/ and http://www.moviecitynews.com/ to point to the new location? Right now, they’re still pointing at typepad.

  3. Allan says:

    There is a real potential for enhancing the movie going
    experience if 3D stereoscopic films are allowed to entered the mix. Robert Rodriguez is offering up his
    “Shark Boy & Lava Girl” kid’s flick in anaglyph 3D on June 10th. The term, anaglyph refers to using contrasting color gel filters to see the seperation of the left and right images. The glasses are mounted in paper and pretty much are a turn off. Note that “Polar Express” did an un-heard-of 15 times as much per screen in 3D as in 2D, using plastic glasses. Those glasses
    were polarized, and costly IMAX 3D equipment was needed.
    There is a pilot program that is offering a few hundred thousand plastic glasses to theaters running “Shark Boy”. These better glasses really provide a better experience and only cost a couple of dollars or so. If
    this advanced anaglyph approach were to be used, “Polar Express” could come back at Christmas in hundreds of regular theaters in addition to the 60 or so IMAX houses that are planning the re-screening next X-mas.
    Any computer generated animation, a-la PIXAR & DREAMWORKS could also have wide release in 3D. Much has been made of the requirement for digital 2K, 3K or 4K
    projection to run 3D effectively. A much cheaper and better choice would be to install the low cost 6 perf
    projection kits for existing 35mm projectors. The Chinese made kits start at about $3,000 and can be changed in a couple of minutes back to standard 35mm 4
    perf. The basis of the frame is the identical layout for
    each panel of Cinerama. (fifty year old technology)A good, bright digital system can cost way over 100 grand!
    This approach allows either anaglyph or polarized glasses to be use. Imax3D is great, but it is like water skiing with a coast guard cutter!

Leave a Reply

The Hot Blog

palmtree on: Don Draper: Critic

Paul Doro on: Don Draper: Critic

anghus on: Don Draper: Critic

Paul Doro on: Don Draper: Critic

palmtree on: Don Draper: Critic

christian on: Don Draper: Critic

Smith on: Don Draper: Critic

movieman on: Don Draper: Critic

hcat on: Don Draper: Critic

Smith on: Don Draper: Critic

Quote Unquotesee all »

“I don’t really think, Sean, that you need to know about my various sexual liaisons. Or that anyone else needs to. I did write about them. I filled a hundred pages of Moleskine notebooks with my one-night stands, my affairs. But I decided they didn’t belong in a professional memoir. First of all, these are real people we’re talking about. Many of them were enjoyable. Some were abject failures. My wife said to me when she read the pages, ‘Of what purpose is this in a memoir? Of what purpose is this other than to titillate?’ The point is, I never see them. It’s because I have nothing in common with them, frankly. And probably didn’t at the time. I could not provide a sensible reason why I married these women. The thing is, in the case of my marriages, it takes two people to fuck up a marriage. It wasn’t simply the fault of these women that I lost interest in them and realised they were insignificant relationships. Which is how I look at them right now–as being insignificant. I see them as blips.”
~ William Friedkin On Cutting Interviewers Off At The Sass

“I have to imagine from Mr. Spielberg’s point of view, the paradigm shift in the 1970s was just the new “normal,” a “halcyon era” from which we are straying in the 21st century–because theatrical exhibition is tenuous (as it has been since the 1940s), the home video market has dried up and people are watching pirated movies on their phone. Spielberg’s coming-of-age era was for him the halcyon period that the 21st century “implosion” will cause to go “crashing into the ground.” But he is wrong. The market for movies is actually diverse and highly segmented–although from the top-down movie industry vantage point and media punditry you would not think this to be true.  Would we really mourn for Mr. Spielberg or ourselves if Lincoln would have been made for cable or had played on public television?  Is it bad for humanity that cable television is creating wonderful, resonant stories in long-form series that people want to watch at home on TV (or streamed onto their computer)? I don’t think so, but it is a paradigm shift and it might affect people’s theatrical moviegoing habits. Televisions in people’s homes have had that effect for seven decades–it is not a new phenomenon. As Art House cinema impresarios we need to focus on what WE can do at our theaters and in our communities. It is not productive for us to fret over what pundits say or about what well-meaning filmmakers like the Stevens–Spielberg and Soderbergh–say. We should fret about what we can do in our communities. What we can do to support filmmakers.”
~ From A Response By Russ Collins, CEO, Michigan Theater–Ann Arbor And Director, Art House Convergence, To Mr. Spielberg