Not Real Early Box Office Analysis
The news of the weekend was somewhere between
June 19, 2013
The Hot Blog
lazarus on: Don Draper: Critic
Jermsguy on: Review: Man of Steel (spoilers)
leahnz on: Don Draper: Critic
Keil S. on: Don Draper: Critic
Joe Leydon on: Don Draper: Critic
Keil S. on: Don Draper: Critic
christian on: Don Draper: Critic
movieman on: Don Draper: Critic
movieman on: Don Draper: Critic
palmtree on: Don Draper: Critic
Trailer: The Wolf of Wall Street
Weekend Estimates by Man of Klady
DP/30: My Day In Video from Michael Cera to Costa-Gravas
Review: Man of Steel (spoilers)
Quote Unquotesee all »
“I don’t really think, Sean, that you need to know about my various sexual liaisons. Or that anyone else needs to. I did write about them. I filled a hundred pages of Moleskine notebooks with my one-night stands, my affairs. But I decided they didn’t belong in a professional memoir. First of all, these are real people we’re talking about. Many of them were enjoyable. Some were abject failures. My wife said to me when she read the pages, ‘Of what purpose is this in a memoir? Of what purpose is this other than to titillate?’ The point is, I never see them. It’s because I have nothing in common with them, frankly. And probably didn’t at the time. I could not provide a sensible reason why I married these women. The thing is, in the case of my marriages, it takes two people to fuck up a marriage. It wasn’t simply the fault of these women that I lost interest in them and realised they were insignificant relationships. Which is how I look at them right now–as being insignificant. I see them as blips.”
~ William Friedkin On Cutting Interviewers Off At The Sass
“I have to imagine from Mr. Spielberg’s point of view, the paradigm shift in the 1970s was just the new “normal,” a “halcyon era” from which we are straying in the 21st century–because theatrical exhibition is tenuous (as it has been since the 1940s), the home video market has dried up and people are watching pirated movies on their phone. Spielberg’s coming-of-age era was for him the halcyon period that the 21st century “implosion” will cause to go “crashing into the ground.” But he is wrong. The market for movies is actually diverse and highly segmented–although from the top-down movie industry vantage point and media punditry you would not think this to be true. Would we really mourn for Mr. Spielberg or ourselves if Lincoln would have been made for cable or had played on public television? Is it bad for humanity that cable television is creating wonderful, resonant stories in long-form series that people want to watch at home on TV (or streamed onto their computer)? I don’t think so, but it is a paradigm shift and it might affect people’s theatrical moviegoing habits. Televisions in people’s homes have had that effect for seven decades–it is not a new phenomenon. As Art House cinema impresarios we need to focus on what WE can do at our theaters and in our communities. It is not productive for us to fret over what pundits say or about what well-meaning filmmakers like the Stevens–Spielberg and Soderbergh–say. We should fret about what we can do in our communities. What we can do to support filmmakers.”
~ From A Response By Russ Collins, CEO, Michigan Theater – Ann Arbor And Director, Art House Convergence, To Mr. Spielberg
General News see all »
- ITV Pays $30M For Controlling Stake In ‘Hatfields & McCoys’ Producer Thinkfactory Media
- The new trailer for 'Anchorman 2' finally sets up the premise and shows new footage
- TV recap: 'The Voice'
- Witless zombie flick ‘World War Z’ falls flat
- 'Star Wars: Episode VII': Is George Lucas Involved in the J.J. Abrams Reboot?
- Movie Review: ‘More Than Honey,’ a Documentary by Markus Imhoof
- 'Frozen' defrosts Kristen Bell's Disney dreams
- Malcolm Gladwell: Albert O. Hirschman and the power of failure.
- Insane Clown Posse says fans aren’t a gang
- Movies: The Lady Auteur
- View more General News Links »
Trade News see all »
- Blake Shelton Danielle Bradbery is the most important artist to ever walk across the ‘Voice’ stage
- 'The Voice' Wraps Season 4, Crowns New Winner (Video)
- Preview Review: ‘The Lego Movie’ Teaser
- In Overhaul, ‘Today’ Show Director Gets a New Title
- Relativity eyes awards for Furnace
- Time Warner Cable Sued Over Lakers and Dodgers Channels
- Guillermo del Toro talks 'Pacific Rim' visuals and a potential sequel
- Weekend Box Office: June 14-16, 2013
- Viking Night
- View more Trade News Links »
Indie News see all »
Bloggers Say… see all »
- LAFF: 'Short Term 12,' 'Crash Reel,' Indiewire Influencers Rock the Regal
- TC 2000
- The Real Lone Ranger—At Auction
- Lefty Filmmakers Grapple with Left-Wing Backlash
- Youtube Mobile vs Youtube on your TV and the impact of TrueView (updated)
- Movie theater junk food: Is it a menace to society?
- Has Anyone Seen "In The Family"?
- Has Anyone Seen "In The Family"?
- View more Bloggers Say… Links »
Geek News see all »
- 'The LEGO Movie' Teaser Trailer: Batman and the Ninja Turtles Join Forces (Video)
- Exclusive Runner, Runner Poster
- First trailer for Anchorman: The Legend Continues drops the channel 4 news team into the '80's!
- The new trailer for 'Anchorman 2' finally sets up the premise and shows new footage
- Russell Crowe Set To Make Feature Directing Debut With THE WATER DIVINER
- Tonight On AOTS: Janina Gavankar Returns, Zero Dark Thirty Cast Interviews & More
- TV Preview: Snap Judgments of 2011-2012 New Shows, From Ringer to Alcatraz
- ‘Resident Evil’ director: Milla Jovovich rising to Sigourney Weaver’s level
- View more Geek News Links »
Press Release see all »
Today’s Gossip see all »
- Amy Adams is no 'Lycra hero,' has 'no features without makeup'
- Marc Mezvinsky lists Fifth Avenue apartment for $4.5 million
- Tiger's ex Rachel Uchitel says no more cubs
- ‘America’s Got Talent’ Recap: The Red Panda Amazes With Acrobatics
- Jimmy Kimmel wants to ‘Channing All Over Your Tatum’ — MUSIC VIDEO
- Backstreet Boys Release ‘In A World Like This’ Single — Listen Here!
- Fun app: Reel Estates maps pop-culture homes
- Tatum O'Neal on Her New Show
- Chris Brown to L.A. City -- My House Graffiti Is Protected By the 1st Amendment!
- View more Today’s Gossip Links »
Critics Say… see all »
- Universal picks up ‘Dumb and Dumber’ sequel
- Meet the 2013 Rooftop Filmmakers #7: Matt Johnson Blurs the Line Between Fiction and Reality in 'The Dirties'
- Happy Birthday, Roger Ebert: How the Late Film Critic Changed My Life at a Steak ‘n Shake
- Francesca Annis
- Movie Review: ‘More Than Honey,’ a Documentary by Markus Imhoof
- 'Man of Steel' Review: 10 Things to Know About the New Superman Movie
- The Kings of Summer
- See It Big: "Play Time"
- When Biography Becomes Legend, Print the Legend: Carlos and The Social Network
- View more Critics Say… Links »
Awards News see all »
Television News see all »
- What could possibly go wrong? Canyon tightrope walk on live TV — with no net
- Jimmy Kimmel Debuts Video for 'I Wanna Channing All Over Your Tatum' (Video)
- 'The Voice' Crowns Its Winner
- The Killing - All You Are Is In the Way
- Scary Movie: The Fear Factor of Mad Men’s Season Six
- Scary Movie: The Fear Factor of Mad Men’s Season Six
- On “Mad Men,” Don Draper assumes the fetal position
- 'Mad Men' premiere: Sexist ads from the era of Don Draper
- Good night, and a few more opinions and recommendations
- Show Tracker is getting a face-lift
- View more Television News Links »
I missed Hide and Seek (if you can call it ‘missing’) but of the rest of the film, I thought that only White Noise was so bad to not deserve the money they made. All the rest delivered at least mild entertainment.
However, I expect House of Wax to be a dud on the lines of Wrong Turn. Here’s hoping Romero’s Land of the Dead is a hit, too.
Why? So they keep churning out more dumbass zombie movies?
“Dumbass zombie movies?” Dude. Romero does not
make dumbass zombie movies. Calling anything associated
with Romero “dumbass” reveals more about your ignorants
than anything else. Romero is easily one of the
greats. It’s that simple. Few people could have
a career he had with all the problems he has had to
deal with. Get better educated before you start
talking smack, Martin.
Jeff, we agree on one thing; I hope LOTD is a hit
as well. Romero deserves to have at least one huge
hit in his career.
The guy made one movie, about 40 years ago, that was a modest critical and financial success. Fuck him for remaking the same crap again. That’s whats called a sellout. Hell, anyone making a “zombie” movie is basically a sellout by definition.
The Amityville Horror, The Forgotten, Resident Evil: Apocalypse, The Grudge, Hide & Seek, The Ring Two, White Noise, Boogeyman and Saw. What do they have in common, other than a strong opening weekend? They all suck ass. Seriously, some of the worst movies of the past year. Not a single decent movie in that list.
I heard Saw was OK, haven’t seen it though. The rest were awful. As long as people keep paying for this horror crap, it won’t get any better. Plus it’s embarassing that Hollywood is so completely out of ideas that this tripe is either remakes, sequels, adaptations, or sequels to adaptations. They can’t even come up with a decent original idea for a horror movie, its a fuckin joke anymore.
I really didn’t understand all of the hype surrounding Saw. It’s garbage. Could have been good, but quickly becomes nothing but cliches and plot holes. Just another generic, idiotic horror flick. Dime a dozen.
Wrong. not all Zombie flicks are “sell-outs”. Shaun of the Dead was pretty funny and a pretty decent movie.
Not really, because that’s what is called a “parody”. And typically the parodies start coming along when their targets cease to be entertaining.
Martin, come off it man. Night of the Dead has a
subtext dealing with the racial issues of the 60s.
Dawn of the Dead deals with the commercialism that
began to spring up in full force during the late
70′s. Day of the Dead deals with the problem of
over militarization and the ramifications of that.
Which brings up to Land of the Dead: IGNORING THE
PROBLEM!
Martin, you are entitled to your opinions, but the
facts just do not bear them out. Sorry there kid,
but you know jack and shit about Romero and even
Shaun of the Dead. Shaun would fall more in the
line of an HOMAGE to Romero’s films than a parody
of them.
Zombie films do not constitute selling out. If it
does, then what the fuck does SAW constitute? A
perfectly good waste of Cary Elwes?
THIS is funny.
“I heard Saw was OK, haven’t seen it though. The rest were awful. As long as people keep paying for this horror crap, it won’t get any better.”
So… YOU paid to see these movies, right? Or are you just assuming that they’re bad movies because critics didn’t like them (like they do 90% of horror movies). So maybe if YOU stop seeing them they will stop making them. Unless of course you’re not the one going to see them and in which case you’re obviously making shit up.
“The Amityville Horror, The Forgotten, Resident Evil: Apocalypse, The Grudge, Hide & Seek, The Ring Two, White Noise, Boogeyman and Saw. What do they have in common, other than a strong opening weekend? They all suck ass. Seriously, some of the worst movies of the past year. Not a single decent movie in that list.”
Again, obviously you’ve seen all of those movies, right?
Here’s something that will please some, infuriate others: “Million Dollar Baby,” with its $30 million budget, is going to join the $100 million club this week. Right now it’s about $3.5 million short of the gross of “The Aviator,” which had a $110 million budget and hasn’t broken even yet.
While on the subject of Oscar movies, I think we now have further evidence as to why studios find it necessary to hold up the release of dramas until awards season. “The Upside of Anger,” which has gotten some of the most positive reviews of any movie released since the Oscar nominations and has a fairly high-profile cast, has only grossed $15 million since it opened six weeks ago. That’s not bad for a film that only cost $12 million, but I still think it’s remarkably low considering it’s had absolutely no competition from any other new dramas. You’d think that at least the “Terms of Endearment” types of audiences would have been packing them in.
Does nobody in Hollywood know how to mass-market a well-reviewed mainstream drama anymore without Oscar nominations/wins attached? Sheesh, even the reviled “Miss Congeniality 2″ has done better than $40 million.
If Kevin Costner no longer has the star wattage to sell even this kind of “Bull Durham”-ish performance, he’d better go shopping for a TV series before it’s too late. Maybe Middle America will rediscover him in something like “CSI: Des Moines.”
While I agree that studios do have a hard time
selling any drama (Just look at the trailers they
produce for any drama. They get more given away
than absolutely any other genre–including comedies.)
to the American moviegoing. However, Upside of
Anger does not suffer from that dilema.
The Upside of Anger did not ever open wide. I forget
who distributed the film, but they killed it before
release. The limited-releasing guaranteed it never
had a chance to build on any steam from Kevin Costner
or Joan Allen being in the film. Why this film received
this sort of marketing and distrubution absolutely
befuddles me.
Hopefully people will find the film on DVD, rental,
or on cable. If not, it just adds to continuing
growing list of films that LIMITED RELEASING HAS
KILLED. Sure it works from time to time, but how
many films has it just killed? For a group of
people who have all the accounting going there own
damn way. The suits and the corps that own them,
sure know how to throw money away.
We just do not live in a world…where limited-releasing
should even be plausible. When a flick gets reviewed
all over the net, in countless mags, and hyped out
the ass but ONLY OPENS IN NY AND LA!?!?! Does that
make anysense anymore? Oy to the vey. This gives
me a ruttin headache.
Better a limited release than straight to video.
“Saw” was a hit — made its money back from the US theatrical run.
“Sahara” is a Paramount title in the US, Canada, Australia and England. Studio didn’t put any money into proudction; instead it’s taking a fee to distribute.
“The Upside of Anger” expanded on 3/18 and went semi-wide (~1100 theaters) on 4/1. New Line went for megaplexes on this release; the closest arthouse to me didn’t pick up this film until 4/15.
FWIW I happened to like “Hide and Seek”.
I paid to see some of those movies (some I saw for free) because I am a fan of the genre and when it comes to movies I’m an eternal optimist. They just all happened to suck. I know Costner was upset with New Line over their handling of The Upside of Anger. He held off on promoting it for a while because he didn’t think they were marketing it properly. Said he wasn’t going to put in the effort if the studio wasn’t willing to do the same. I liked the movie. Allen is fantastic. Deserved a wider audience.
theres a reason some movies don’t get promotion. its because they aren’t good.
More astute analysis from bob, who only sees the world in black and white. Could you be any more simplistic? There’s a little more to it than that, whether you realize it or not. Did you even see the movie? It’s a good movie that got mostly positive reviews. Sometimes it appears that you are speaking out of your ass.
if the money people behind a movie thought they could make more by promoting it, don’t u think they would, mr i see the gray of the world? no. in ur world i guess its not true. the reason costners movie got no publicity is because its NOT GOOD. did they have publicity for field of dreams? bull durham? yea because they were good. so fawn over joan allen all u want thats not bringing people in a theatre.
You know it’s not that they are out of ideas. Hollywood just plays it safe now, people want to see cheesey horror, and since they are cheap to make Hollywood has no problem pushing them out the door, (of course as long as House of Wax doesn’t include the cost of the sound stage they burned down in the final cost of the film), I can’t stand those films so I don’t see them. However there seems to be an audience.
But then what do I know I watched the film Freaked over the weekend and remember just how funny it was, and I’ll bet most people don’t even remember Alex Winters first attempt at writing producing and directing.
As long as people see cheesy horror flicks, the more they will make and remake them.
Davey- Go home Now. I mean fucking really.
SAW a near hit? Gregg, Oren and Mark the producers personally clear $40 m, Lions Gate many millions more and it’s a near hit?
David you have outdone yourself- the crap film only cost $2.5- it was one of the most profitable hits of 05.
You really are stupid, says Spam Dooley.
Chester, I’d argue with you about “The Upside of Anger”. I’d say it got mixed-to-good reviews. But not flat out great reviews that “Million Dollar Baby” and “Sideways” received. I read some critics that hated it. I’ve seen the movie. I enjoyed it because it was different than the typical mother-daughter(s) melodrama, but I can’t say I was overly impressed.
Both Fever Pitch and Sahara fell less than 30% from last weekend, I think that is quite impressive. But The Interpreter will be the big winner next week. The question is how “big” will it be.
Do you guys think that the slightly depressed overall receipts have actually spread dollars around a little more? It seems like this year so far is sporting, at least, fewer out-and-out flops. Last year by this time we had Club Dread, Against the Ropes, Spartan, The Whole Ten Yards, that Dirty Dancing sequel, The Girl Next Door, Mooseport, and Tad Hamilton all sliding in under the 20 million mark (no reflection meant, of course, on the varying quality of those movies, one way or the other), and The Alamo losing all kinds of money. There have been a few notable flops this year (Elektra, Cursed, Alone in the Dark) but it seems like a lot of stuff — even franchise diappointments like Miss Congeniality and Beauty Shop — will be able to make it to the $40-80 range. Hey, a few of the movies are even inexpensive enough to turn a profit on that. Which is probably how movies released during this time should be working anyway, right
I’ve never understood this entertainment-biz (or maybe business in general) phenom of how you can’t just be making money — you need to be making a RECORD amount of money. Like the music companies filing lawsuits against downloaders, seemingly founded on the belief that the music industry has a *right* not to experience sales drops (whatever may be causing them).
Is Sahara’s decent hold due to its popularity with moviegoers or a lack of competition over this past weekend? Fever Pitch skews more adult and female, so I’m not surprised by its hold. Not really all that noteworthy.
saw didn’t cost 2 million to make. work on those numbers spammer
I believe the writer and director claim that Saw cost only $1 million to make. Filmed it in 17 days.
Bicycle Boy
It was UNDER $2 as per Gregg Hoffman
Get bent
I am Spam Dooley and I say you suck
No matter its budget, Saw has to be qualified as a success.
No doubt. Whether it cost $1 million or $5 million, Saw was a big hit.
Context Dooley… you are a reactionary… read full sentences… both Saw and Boogeyman are financial hits… both fell just short of $20 million openings…
Stop looking to rage… full sentences… even if poorly constructed…
Ethan, I never said “The Upside of Anger” got “flat out great reviews.” I said it “has gotten some of the most positive reviews of any movie released since the Oscar nominations.” There’s a huge difference.
Should read “Last graph edited to reflect the truth”
Everyone here read the posting- you called it a flop.
Spam Says That is a Spammy No -No!
Not what I said, Spammy… just because you are functionally ill-tempered doesn’t change my words or my intent.
One would have to be ignorant indeed to think Saw was not a big money winner. But that wasn’t the point of the paragraph. The $19 million opening alone was enough to make it a success. And if you can’t figure out that I know that, you need to retire from Spamming.
I think that Saw is only slightly disappointing per-expectations. I know when I saw ads for it at the time, I thought it would be a breakout hit.. and it was, but I don’t think it reached it’s full potential at theaters. To a certain extent, it was not quite as good as moviegoers expected, and also, it got burnt by another movie, I think it was Grudge, that was playing at the same time. This is similar to what happened to the movie Hellboy, which got hurt by that Rock movie opening the same weekend. $50 mill for Saw is alot of $$, but it could’ve done almost double that.
Guys help Davey
He called it a “near-hit”
In English this means NOT a hit but ALMOST.
It was a MONSTER hit if hit means making money.
It made money and then some opening weekend.
So please- I agree that you knew- I agree that you are smart- I agree that you are even THE MAN- but what you said was not True.
And Dooley Goes Round and Round….
get a life.
YOu mean I should run a blog and website about movies that strives to be definitive and then state falsehoods and then say that I never said them?
That’s a life?
Come Sail away with Spam Dooley.
Speaking of dubious statements about movies: Here it is, three weeks after “Sin City” allegedly changed the face of filmmaking forever. Only thing is, last I checked, the revolution appears to have dropped off the radar, even in this blog. Is anyone, anywhere, still talking about this movie?
I’m Joe Leydon, and I send out for pizza for my people.
I am spam dooley and I feed my ego!
Joe-
Yes. SIN CITY has completely changed Hollywood.
Expect to see the new Hollywood in 2007.
Change takes time.
I am Spam Dooley and I FEED my people!
“You know it’s not that they are out of ideas. Hollywood just plays it safe now, people want to see cheesey horror, and since they are cheap to make Hollywood has no problem pushing them out the door, (of course as long as House of Wax doesn’t include the cost of the sound stage they burned down in the final cost of the film), I can’t stand those films so I don’t see them. However there seems to be an audience.”
1. Horror is cheap and ALWAYS HAS BEEN
2. Horror is popular and ALWAYS HAS BEEN
I don’t really understand the lamenting that people are doing over horror movies lately (Not you, i was just pointing out that they ARE cheap and theyARE popular but always have been). I mean, seriously, horror movies were always the cheap double feature and have always been immencely popular.
They’ve also been lacking in originality since a few decades back.
But i think the reason that there are no “Texas Chainsaw Massacre”s or “The Last House on the Left”s anymore is because limited release is held specifically for more arty pictures and distributers don’t do the whole Midnight showing/drive through thing anymore.
Movies open all on one weekend, they don’t open a few hundred and then make their way around the country.
Plus, can you IMAGINE the outcry if a movie about a bunch of guys raping and murdering two girls and then having the parents go on a murderous rampage was released now? The right would have a field say saying it promoted anti-christian views and that we should see more movies about cute little kids and their dogs.
Of course the most violent movie of last year was “The Passion of the Christ” and that got shown on 3000 screens and was hailed as a masterpiece.
…bizarrely, i know.
…
i really think spammer is jeff wells and hes still pissed dave has surpassed him
At the risk of encouraging Spamster, I almost hope he knows what he’s talking about. No, I don’t want to see a slew of blue-screen movies. (Trust me on this: I’ve seen enough BAD blue-screen movies at film festivals to know that they’re even WORSE than bad traditional-technology film.) But a “new Hollywood” likely wouldn’t be a bad idea. Surely something needs to change in the remake/recycle/retread mentality that apparently has the creative talents and decision makers in its grip. I mean, it seems like every day now I’m reading about yet ANOTHER FREAKIN’ REMAKE being green-lit. (Today’s announcement of a new “Experiment in Terror” is just the latest in a long, long line.) Maybe filmmakers really have run out of new ideas. The good news is, maybe this will boost sales for my book — filmmakers and wanna-bes can scour the pages in search of movies to remake. But the bad news is, we’re all in for some numbingly familiar films.
I’m Joe Leydon, and since I’m in Nashville this week, I’ll buy Krystal hamburgers for my people.
Spam is not Jeff Wells. SPam knows what he is talking about, but polite diplomatic talk isn’t his strong point, scrapping is. At least he isn’t a passive aggressive back-stabbing wanker, which is rare in entertainment biz.
How does Spam know what he’s talking about? All he does is disagree with David about nonsense.
Terry
I disagree with WHOMEVER when they are wrong.
Davey is RIGHT way more often than he is wrong.
I know what I am talking about because I am in the business and only speak what I know.
I am Spam Dooley and I FEED my People!
dave can say the sky is blue and dooley will go on a rant about how its really green and dave is blind.
Spammer Dooley. The Know It Least is at it again. Props to his feeding people.
regards to SAW. It was the most profitable film for LG – more than Farenheit 9/11. Spam is correct. Who cares about opening numbers in whatever context when a hit is not declared a hit.
So you can say it was a monster smash of epic proportions for them and the filmmakers who took a sweet backend deal and no upfront.
Boogeyman is a piece of shit that pulled in young girls who read RL Stine. Wait for his bigscreen GOOSEBUMPS crossover to make some serious coinage.
pre-teen horror – next big wave. catch it.
I’d be there for a Goosebumps movie! As long as it was better than the annoying tv series.
Man, Goosebumps were awesome.
Although they were extremely popular with boys not just girls.
But, seriously, the Goosebumps books are the greatest thing in the history of the world. Gimme some “Camp Jellyjam” any day of the week!
These horror movies do very weel week one. The key is having staying power for the oncoming weeks.
Please check some information about texas holdem texas holdem http://texas-holdem.warrenzanes.com/ wsop wsop http://wsop.warrenzanes.com/ poker tournament poker tournament http://poker-tournament.warrenzanes.com/ free online poker game free online poker game http://free-online-poker-game.warrenzanes.com/ card poker card poker http://card-poker.warrenzanes.com/ free poker chip set free poker chip set http://free-poker-chip-set.lisaandjamie.com/ yahoo poker yahoo poker http://yahoo-poker.lisaandjamie.com/ poker rule poker rule http://poker-rule.lisaandjamie.com/ online casino poker online casino poker http://online-casino-poker.lisaandjamie.com/ free strip poker free strip poker http://free-strip-poker.pileband.com/ celebrity poker celebrity poker http://celebrity-poker.az-greenvalley.com/ winning poker hands winning poker hands http://winning-poker-hands.lisaandjamie.com/ basic rules of poker basic rules of poker http://basic-rules-of-poker.fresnay.net/ poker players poker players http://poker-players.az-greenvalley.com/ free texas hold em online play free texas hold em online play http://free-texas-hold-em-online-play.lisaandjamie.com/ casino poker casino poker http://casino-poker.pileband.com/ omaha poker omaha poker http://omaha-poker.pileband.com/ cowboy poker cowboy poker http://cowboy-poker.pileband.com/ texas hold em online texas hold em online http://texas-hold-em-online.bentrecords.net/ texas hold em poker game texas hold em poker game http://texas-hold-em-poker-game.bentrecords.net/ texas hold em strategy texas hold em strategy http://texas-hold-em-strategy.e-poker-winner.com/ free online poker free online poker http://free-online-poker.winning-e-poker.com/ poker rooms poker rooms http://poker-rooms.winning-e-poker.com/ texas holdem strategy texas holdem strategy http://texas-holdem-strategy.win-poker-games.com/ world poker world poker http://world-poker.win-poker-games.com/ free texas hold em online play free texas hold em online play http://free-texas-hold-em-online-play.win-poker-games.com/ video poker software video poker software http://video-poker-software.win-poker-games.com/ poker on line poker on line http://poker-on-line.win-poker-games.com/ stud poker stud poker http://stud-poker.play-e-poker.com/ poker strip poker strip http://poker-strip.play-e-poker.com/ …
Great reads, thanks.
adjustable rate mortgage
***SIGH***
I really miss Spam Dooley feeding his people!
It’s a shame you don’t have a donate button! I’d without a doubt donate to this superb blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to brand new updates and will share this website with my Facebook group. Chat soon!