MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

Has Anyone Ever…

… had as high a profile as John Cameron Mitchell after making one film in his life, which grossed less than $4 million worldwide and couldn’t win one Indie Spirit Award with five nominations?

The guy is still a major face in indies over three and a half years later… and I hope he’s a great talent… but even his one film was based on an established theatrical success that was worked to perfection over years of work… and he did sign on to Tarnation… but geez… his follow-up film started casting two years ago… and I’m sure he’s a great guy… but Kevin Smith made two films in the three years after Clerks and six in the decade since… time to put some new chum in the water if this shark is supposed to keep swimming near that boat…

17 Responses to “Has Anyone Ever…”

  1. Blue Stealer says:

    Smith has made six movies and promptly ruined the career of his buddy, Ben. He has that going for him at least.

  2. LifeAndDeathBrigade says:

    Kev did nothing but give his friend a career, helped
    him get an Oscar, and continues to get the best
    performances out of Affleck then any other director
    Affleck has worked with. Oh the critics did not
    like Jersey Girl but critics have shown this holiday
    season that they seem to enjoy some of the fakest
    films ever made that do not have a lick of CGI
    in them.
    Smith shows the world that Affleck has talent. Now
    if only Affleck would take care of his woman, his
    possibly forth coming child, and maybe pick better\
    films. He will be all rosey.

  3. JT says:

    I think Roger Mitchell got Affleck’s best performance out of him. “Changing Lanes” is far superior to anything else he has done, before or since it.

  4. PeppersDad says:

    In my opinion, Affleck is a perfectly OK actor. I think his problem is that he never surpasses his material. So in quality films like Shakespeare in Love, Changing Lanes, Chasing Amy and Good Will Hunting he gets the job done with a lot of charisma. But in Daredevil, Gigli, Surviving Christmas, etc., he sinks like a stone. Unlike a lot of people, I haven’t written him off yet. But after all this time in the public eye, throughout which he has displayed an especially keen intellect, he still hasn’t convinced me that he has a lot more innate talent than someone like Brad Pitt.

  5. Joe Leydon says:

    I know I’m going to catch grief for saying this, but I’ve always thought Ben Affleck’s performance in “Bounce” was very under-rated. The arc he made from cocksure bravado through drunken guilt to desperate lunge at redemption — that really impressed me. No joke. Maybe he’s one of those impossibly handsome guys who are most impressive when they work AGAINST their good looks, to reveal weakness, uncertainty and self-loathing beneath the slick veneer. Kinda sorta like he did in “Changing Lanes.”

  6. Mark says:

    You’re right. Bounce was god awful. His career peaked with Dazed and Confused. He’s a character actor.

  7. PeppersDad says:

    Mark –
    You just used some jargon that some people here might not be familiar with. As someone in the industry, as you profess to be, please provide us with your experienced, learned definition of a character actor and how Affleck meets that definition.

  8. JT says:

    I too have not written off Affleck yet. He is capavle of good things and has done them before and will, no doubt, find something really worth doing again. Perhaps he should look for those directors who can reign his talents in. when he has been good in a film (SIL, GWH, CL, and, yes, even in the mostly forgettable “Bounce”), he seems to shut off that thing that drags his performances down. He would do better to stop working with the Michael Bays and work more with the likes of guys like Paul Greenglass, who got a great performance of minimilism from his friend Matt. maybe go lower budget (no Kevin Smith movies ever again…PLEASE!!!!) and do some independent work. After all, its not like he doesnt have the bank to sit in for the rest of his life.

  9. Mark says:

    Look at Ben’s best roles. Dazed and Confused. Good Will Hunting. Boiler Room. Shakespeare in Love. Mallrats. What do they all have in common? He was a supporting player and a character actor. His worst roles and movies? He was the lead. You follow me, Peppa? The guy needs to go back to his roots and stop going for the leads and crappy movies. He needs to take good roles and forget about his price tag. He needs to get back to doing the work.

  10. Joe S. says:

    Affleck is decent. His problem: People tried to make him a superstar, and that just didn’t work. He couldn’t suck up the pressure, he didn’t have the appeal, and worst of all, he just didn’t have the talent for it. He has about 8 facial expressions that offer little or no subtlety when it comes to his emotions. Oh, and the fact that many people in Hollywood tried to force his stardom didn’t help. I agree with Mark; he should be limited to just supporting roles.
    But forgive me for not jumping on the Kevin Smith bashing bandwagon that seems to be popular these days. I liked all of his films (including Jersey Girl), loved a couple of them.

  11. PeppersDad says:

    I follow you here, Mark. Yes, I tend to agree with you about Affleck. His career arc seems to be running parallel to that of Alec Baldwin: handsome, leading-man type; stands out in early supporting roles; keeps winding up on the gossip pages for his romantic involvements with starlets; politically active, liberal and articulate; can’t carry a movie on his own; particularly disappoints when trying to establish himself as an action hero; will likely find renewed appreciation when he returns to smaller roles.

  12. tylerfile says:

    Yes, Hedwig was a very fine movie, but it’s not exactly fair to say it got to be so good because the material was well-honed by being a long-running stage hit. On stage it was raw and immediate and real and very much meant for the theater, and on film it was a fresh newly-minted movie musical, very much for the cinema, kind of groundbreaking in the ways it told its story in musical cinema forms.

  13. LifeAndDeathBrigade says:

    If we are going to call Affleck a character actor.
    Then we all should be on agreement that Jude Law’s
    one as well. Yet, no film in which Law has ever
    been the MAIN STAR has ever made as much as any
    film in which Affleck has been the lead. So if
    Affleck gets pegged with that label, then Law
    should have it tattooed to his ass.
    And if Mark is in the industry. I have all
    sorts of sympathy for the industry.

  14. joe says:

    I am just gonna say one thing about Ben affleck…………Who is he?

  15. bicycle bob says:

    some guys are better off not being the main guy star. law and affleck are two of em

  16. LifeAndDeathBrigade says:

    Look at that solid comment from bob. Good show
    there bob.

  17. bicycle bob says:

    when u pay attention and listen instead of sprouting off insults, u learn something Life guy. A good lesson for u this christmas season.

The Hot Blog

movieman on: BYOBlog

leahnz on: BYOBlog

Stella's Boy on: BYOB - RIP The Goldfinch

Stella's Boy on: BYOBlog

movieman on: BYOBlog

leahnz on: BYOBlog

palmtree on: BYOBlog

leahnz on: BYOB - RIP The Goldfinch

leahnz on: BYOBlog

Stella's Boy on: BYOBlog

Quote Unquotesee all »

“Well, actually, of that whole group that I call the post-60s anti-authority auteurs, a lot of them came from television. Peckinpah’s the only one whose television work represents his feature work. I mean, like the only one. Mark Rydell can direct a really good episode of ‘Gunsmoke’ and Michael Ritchie can direct a really good episode of ‘The Big Valley,’ but they don’t necessarily look like The Candidate. But Peckinpah’s stuff, even the scripts he wrote that he didn’t even direct, have a Peckinpah feel – the way I think there’s a Corbucci West – suggest a Peckinpah West. That even in his random episodes that he wrote for ‘Gunsmoke’ – it’s right there.”
~ Quentin Tarantino

“The thought is interrupted by an odd interlude. We are speaking in the side room of Casita, a swish and fairly busy Italian bistro in Aoyama – a district of Tokyo usually so replete with celebrities that they spark minimal fuss. Kojima’s fame, however, exceeds normal limits and adoring staff have worked out who their guest is. He stops mid-sentence and points up towards the speakers, delighted. The soft jazz that had been playing discreetly across the restaurant’s dark, hardwood interior has suddenly been replaced with the theme music from some of Kojima’s hit games. Harry Gregson-Williams’ music is sublime in its context but ‘Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots’ is not, Kojima acknowledges, terribly restauranty. He pauses, adjusting a pair of large, blue-framed glasses of his own design, and returns to the way in which games have not only influenced films, but have also changed the way in which people watch them. “There are stories being told [in cinema] that my generation may find surprising but which the gamer generation doesn’t find weird at all,” he says.
~ Hideo Kojima