MCN Blogs
David Poland

By David Poland poland@moviecitynews.com

More On The Dart Thrown By Pat

Just a thought…

I think it’s great that Scott Rudin is coming to Leslee Dart’s side in this time of transition, but here is another angle on the "firing in the middle of Oscar season" angle…

Given that the contract was up sometime in December, waiting until the bitter end would be even more damaging for Oscar-leaning clients.  The next week leads up to the Thanksgiving holiday… even though Mr. Rudin is revving the Closer engines right now, this is, for all intents and purposes, the only lull period until Christmas.  And with nominations closing on January 15, a lot of publicists will be eating their Christmas goose at their desks. 

Wouldn’t it have been much worse for this to drag on into December? 

Also, by treating it as a termination and not as a simple exit at the end of a contract, doesn’t that blur the likely-contracted rules about client-taking, competition and staff cherry picking?

My guess is that by December 1, Ms. Dart’s clients will notice little has changed for them except for the name on the stationery.

Also…

This breakdown at PMK/HBH is oddly reminiscent of the breakdown of CAA as Ovitz left.  It’s wasn’t the end of CAA by any stretch of the imagination.  But it was the end of the monolithic view of agentry in this town. 

CAA was The King. Likewise, outside of a few specific publicists, PMK has been seen as The King (or The Queen if you will).  A big part of that power was an absolute domination of the biggest names in the game, which allowed for packaging on a higher level than anyone else.  And the same has been true at PMK.  Having a problem (like not signing your life away to get access) with Tom Cruise and you have had a problem with everyone else in town, it has seemed.  It’s not that PMK still won’t be able to push really, really hard.  But Cruise, Kidman, Hanks, Rudin and Imagine represent a big chunk of the current upper echelon and they will (most likely) now be flacked elsewhere.

It’s not exactly breaking up ATT, but in Hollywood terms…

One Response to “More On The Dart Thrown By Pat”

  1. Mark says:

    Still can’t see this getting nominated. Doesn’t look appealing to the masses.

Leave a Reply

The Hot Blog

Quote Unquotesee all »

“I don’t really think, Sean, that you need to know about my various sexual liaisons. Or that anyone else needs to. I did write about them. I filled a hundred pages of Moleskine notebooks with my one-night stands, my affairs. But I decided they didn’t belong in a professional memoir. First of all, these are real people we’re talking about. Many of them were enjoyable. Some were abject failures. My wife said to me when she read the pages, ‘Of what purpose is this in a memoir? Of what purpose is this other than to titillate?’ The point is, I never see them. It’s because I have nothing in common with them, frankly. And probably didn’t at the time. I could not provide a sensible reason why I married these women. The thing is, in the case of my marriages, it takes two people to fuck up a marriage. It wasn’t simply the fault of these women that I lost interest in them and realised they were insignificant relationships. Which is how I look at them right now–as being insignificant. I see them as blips.”
~ William Friedkin On Cutting Interviewers Off At The Sass

“I have to imagine from Mr. Spielberg’s point of view, the paradigm shift in the 1970s was just the new “normal,” a “halcyon era” from which we are straying in the 21st century–because theatrical exhibition is tenuous (as it has been since the 1940s), the home video market has dried up and people are watching pirated movies on their phone. Spielberg’s coming-of-age era was for him the halcyon period that the 21st century “implosion” will cause to go “crashing into the ground.” But he is wrong. The market for movies is actually diverse and highly segmented–although from the top-down movie industry vantage point and media punditry you would not think this to be true.  Would we really mourn for Mr. Spielberg or ourselves if Lincoln would have been made for cable or had played on public television?  Is it bad for humanity that cable television is creating wonderful, resonant stories in long-form series that people want to watch at home on TV (or streamed onto their computer)? I don’t think so, but it is a paradigm shift and it might affect people’s theatrical moviegoing habits. Televisions in people’s homes have had that effect for seven decades–it is not a new phenomenon. As Art House cinema impresarios we need to focus on what WE can do at our theaters and in our communities. It is not productive for us to fret over what pundits say or about what well-meaning filmmakers like the Stevens–Spielberg and Soderbergh–say. We should fret about what we can do in our communities. What we can do to support filmmakers.”
~ From A Response By Russ Collins, CEO, Michigan Theater – Ann Arbor And Director, Art House Convergence, To Mr. Spielberg